I do not recall calling him scummy or voting for him at any point in this gameday.
In post 765, Aneninen wrote:I still think that my wagon length is absurd compared to the posts about me and to the amount of my posts.
I find it absurd you keep bringing it up, you're a wagon of three votes.
Three.
In post 776, TierShift wrote:Okay thor, I understand now. You captured the issue I had with your posting in 762. Just remember that if you say something like 'I want to lynch you now', it makes people think you scumread said person.
I will agree that if someone read that and decided to infer information from it without paying attention to what I was saying about my issue then, sure, they could get the wrong impression via that inference.
Don't know why you called it bad in any way though, as one would like to think that meant you analyzed it before making said value call.
In post 776, TierShift wrote:Just this one quote doesn't make sense. Haven't we both agreed that iza did not in fact produce scummy content (which I thought you were arguing) or town content (which you think I'm arguing, but I'm not!), but that the scripten scumread was null behaviour? Then how does the next quote in which you call him scummy for it make sense?
In post 756, Thor665 wrote:You have not really addressed why you had issue with me questioning him or finding his answers scummy.
Well...first off, his answers are scummy - that doesn't prove he is scummy, but his answers were screwy as all get out.
I said they were screwy as all get out.
In the perfect world of analysis, if he's town, he is town who is screwy as all get out.
You leapt to his defense and had issue with my conclusions as regards him - which, by definition, means you have to have a town read there or there would be no issue to raise with me and what I said.
If your read of him was 'null' for instance...that would mean that you would understand his reads were screwy and would have agreed with me and, if you had decided to call it out, your language would have been one of 'what scum motive do you see in his screwy logic' as opposed to your chosen track.
As I said, I founf your defense of him/attack of me straneg and illogical and I'm actually trying to get you to explain it.
Quoting something I said after that attack and acting confused by it is *not* helping me understand you.
I have been very open and clear with my thoughts.
You have not.
Stop that.
Back up your gak now please.
1. Explain your specific issue with how I approached him (even working within the misunderstanding you're now admitting to)
2. Then describe your chosen approach and why you thought it was a good approach.
That would be helpful.
In post 782, goodmorning wrote: In post 742, Thor665 wrote:I am holding off on revealing until Goodmorning manages to get back to me with explanations on the fear of revealing and why it is pro-scum in some way.
I've already spoken as much as I want to speak on the subject.
It's a little late now, anyway.
Well...when you're asked "why shouldn't we, I am curious?"
And your answer is "because it be bad!" and nothing else...what did you expect?
If you gave a hang you did a bad showing for yourself and the belief system you claim to espouse.
In post 790, TierShift wrote:Yeah. But that's not enough to certainly know he's in a neighbourhood, now is it?
I would think my other comment of 'I am in a neighborhood and not claiming it yet' would remove all doubt.
And I'd be fascinated to hear all the theory roles that I might posses wherein I would know the game is multi-neighborhood without being in a neighborhood.
Stupid scum with Pre/Day talk or Neighborizer is all I can come up with at this point.
In post 798, hephaestus wrote:Sorry stupid question probably but are neighbourhoods beneficial to either town or scum in any way?
Do you know what a Neighborhood is? If so - why don't you tell us your opinion on this question.
If not there is the Wiki;
http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Neighbor
How much of a newbie are you?