DeathSauce wrote:Hmmm, CrashTextDummy finds a tiny inconsistency and tries blowing it up into major thing, where have we seen this behavior before?
Stuff like this pisses me off. Internal inconsistencies tend to be among the more reliable scum-tells in my experience, so when I see one, I point it out. If the person being inconsistent can't explain it away, I tend to think he's scum. Evidently, the majority of the town either agreed with me or didn't feel bothered to present a feasible counter-wagon. I do not appreciate at all the way you're trying to pin this one on me in an attempt to discredit my legitimacy.
Oh yes, when we lynched VRK, a TOWNIE over nothing!
When are you planning to make up your mind on this matter anyhow? It's easy for you to say
now
that we lynched him over "nothing", but yesterday you didn't seem to think that way:
DeathSauce wrote:I still am suspicious of CTD and Peter's motivation. I disagree with some of the reasoning behind their votes on VRK. But I have to admit they might be correct.
Why do I get the feeling that you're much more interested in making various people appear in a bad light, instead of actually hunting scum? You've done at least 3 U-turns when it comes to your opinion of me and the wagon on VRK, and while I acknowledge that it's quite natural to change your opinion over the course of a game as a townsperson, I'm growing increasingly wary of it in your case.
Mustafa15 - I'm willing to buy that answer, but it didn't adress all the gripes I have with you. You were basically non-existant during the deadline period, and since I happen to believe that the mislynch wasn't scum-driven, that makes you a prime candidate for scum lying low. It's about time we hear some actual analysis from you, and a List of Suspicion would be a nice place to start.