Robbery! At The Casino (Game Over)

Majiffy · Post Post #325 (ISO) » Mon Sep 29, 2014 2:19 pm

WAT

NO WAI

It'll be in the next VC, sorry.

Dr Pants · Post Post #326 (ISO) » Mon Sep 29, 2014 2:20 pm

In post 300, shos wrote:
In post 290, shos wrote:Actually des has some good point against DT there with the RVS-removal-of-responsibility excuses.

242 reads as bad halfomgus.
243 reads as just bad. Pick an inactive, vote for rvs voting pattern(lol?). Lazy scumplay away from radar.

VOTE: dr pants
One sgould wear their pants on legs not head.

Add to that, 'not reading the thread'. what, if I don't mention your name specifically, you don't read? I intentionally did not name you here.

I dont see how my BBT vote is scummy. BBT is not inactive, if anything he's been overly active. You're comments suggest that you treat RVS as if its meaningless, which I disagree with. Additionally, how is my play lazy? If anything, I've been rejecting most major wagons/opinions and I'm doing my own thing.

shos · Post Post #327 (ISO) » Mon Sep 29, 2014 6:02 pm

Unless a vote gets someone to L-1 or so, RVS *is* meaningless. Also, BBT was not active YET when you voteds him.

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #328 (ISO) » Tue Sep 30, 2014 12:16 am

In post 286, Perfect Chaos wrote:
You don’t seem to have a problem with Becks read on Prolapse from post #17, but you take umbrage with someone looking for preliminary reads on page 4? Seems fishy, and that is saying something coming from me.

I agreed with Beck's initial read for a start. PB has also continued to do nothing and my read hasn't changed in that respect.

I don't know if you're intentionally trying to misrepresent me here. I was not scum-reading Gray for his efforts with his reads, I was merely saying he was wasting time and effort that could be put to better use at a later stage in the game.

In post 287, Perfect Chaos wrote:

Please someone kill:
Aronis

What's your read on Aronis?

In post 326, Dr Pants wrote:
I dont see how my BBT vote is scummy. BBT is not inactive, if anything he's been overly active.

I'm overly active. This is a joke right? Even if I was overly active, which I'm not, that is not a reason to scum-read someone.

Beck · Post Post #329 (ISO) » Tue Sep 30, 2014 12:35 am

How can someone with only 22 posts be considered overly active?

And speaking as someone who usually is the most active player in a game, I can assure you it's not scummy to be active.

Since pants is new, I understand his opinion on RVS, realizing its worthless comes with time and experience he just doesn't have yet.

I'm feeling slightly better about shos but I'm still not 100% on him. Prolapsed is scum but idk how else to convince people.

Dr Pants · Post Post #330 (ISO) » Tue Sep 30, 2014 3:09 am

read through BBT's posts. Overly active doesnt just mean post count. In this case, I mean specifically that hes very quickly moving from wagon to wagon. He isn't sitting on a consistent idea or train of thought, and seems to be just going for whatever the biggest wagon is.

Aronis · Post Post #331 (ISO) » Tue Sep 30, 2014 3:11 am

Prolapsed is scum? OK!

VOTE: Prolapsed

I dont like Dr Pants very much atm. But my gut still says he's prob town.

shos · Post Post #332 (ISO) » Tue Sep 30, 2014 3:23 am

Ignore thine guy und voat the one with their pants on their elvis

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #333 (ISO) » Tue Sep 30, 2014 6:45 am

In post 329, Beck wrote: Prolapsed is scum but idk how else to convince people.

Let's pretend for a moment that PB is mod-confirmed town. Where else are you willing to look?

In post 330, Dr Pants wrote:read through BBT's posts. Overly active doesnt just mean post count. In this case, I mean specifically that hes very quickly moving from wagon to wagon. He isn't sitting on a consistent idea or train of thought, and seems to be just going for whatever the biggest wagon is.

I've explained every one of my votes. If you have issue with them, take me up on it. Otherwise, stop pushing reasons for why I'm scum that have already been explained and are no longer valid.

In post 331, Aronis wrote:Prolapsed is scum? OK!

VOTE: Prolapsed

I dont like Dr Pants very much atm. But my gut still says he's prob town.

I don't like Aronis at all so far. His ISO is full of fluff and lacking any sort of scum-hunting. His votes have been pretty badly timed with bad explanations and now he's sheeping onto PB.

@

Aronis

, how and why did your read change on DT?

Why are you voting PB?

VOTE: Aronis

Beck · Post Post #334 (ISO) » Tue Sep 30, 2014 6:59 am

In post 333, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Why are you voting PB?

Why are you not?

I mean you are on record saying that you sort of agree with me with regards to him yet now you are here voting somebody who is also voting prolapsed.. It makes no sense

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #335 (ISO) » Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:06 am

I could vote him but it would be on the premise that he is lurking and I don't feel comfortable with that at this early stage. Sure, if his behaviour continues and nothing improves in terms of his posting frequency and the content of his posts, I'll gladly jump on that wagon.

Beck · Post Post #336 (ISO) » Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:13 am

this early stage?

you realize this game has been going on longer than we have days left in the day phase right? How long are you going to be content with letting a scummy player lurk?

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #337 (ISO) » Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:19 am

In post 336, Beck wrote:this early stage?

you realize this game has been going on longer than we have days left in the day phase right? How long are you going to be content with letting a scummy player lurk?

No, I didn't realise that. The small number of pages must have threw me off, I thought we were only 4 or 5 days in.

This is a quiet D1.

OK, time for some pressure.

VOTE: PB

shos · Post Post #338 (ISO) » Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:31 am

VOTE: Aronis
any votes further than this - be wary, we're nearing a lynch, I think. no lolhammers by mistake.

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #339 (ISO) » Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:33 am

Both my scum-reads getting wagons.

I'm enjoying life.

Beck · Post Post #340 (ISO) » Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:44 am

In post 338, shos wrote:VOTE: Aronis
any votes further than this - be wary, we're nearing a lynch, I think. no lolhammers by mistake.

lol PB has only 3 votes, I think we are safe...

theaceofspades · Post Post #341 (ISO) » Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:45 am

more votes on aronis pls

GrayFoxxxx · Post Post #342 (ISO) » Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:48 am

In post 338, shos wrote:VOTE: Aronis
any votes further than this - be wary, we're nearing a lynch, I think. no lolhammers by mistake.

Like Beck said PB is far from being lynched. This looks like a "look how town I'm being" post.

Beck · Post Post #343 (ISO) » Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:57 am

In post 341, theaceofspades wrote:more votes on aronis pls

Whats the case on him?

shos · Post Post #344 (ISO) » Tue Sep 30, 2014 8:14 am

PB?
we're talking about Aronis here
and I didn't check the votes lol

Beck · Post Post #345 (ISO) » Tue Sep 30, 2014 8:53 am

In post 343, Beck wrote:
Whats the case on him?

shos · Post Post #346 (ISO) » Tue Sep 30, 2014 8:56 am

this post is just so bad

Beck · Post Post #347 (ISO) » Tue Sep 30, 2014 8:58 am

why is it bad?

Prolapsed Brain · Post Post #348 (ISO) » Tue Sep 30, 2014 8:59 am

In post 331, Aronis wrote:Prolapsed is scum? OK!

VOTE: Prolapsed

I dont like Dr Pants very much atm. But my gut still says he's prob town.

This is a very scummy post. Taking another player's word on alignment (AKA sheeping) is very lazy and something scum do. A lot.

shos isn't looking terribly town right now, either.

BBT, do you have any reason to vote me other than lurking? Or supposed "lack" of content?

shos · Post Post #349 (ISO) » Tue Sep 30, 2014 9:01 am

because it is both a sheep, and a bad question reactions, and a horrible reason to vote a person, and a silent jump on a rising wagon.