Quagmire (3): Save The Dragons, spectrumvoid, ThAdmiral
Mastermind of Sin (1): Quagmire
ThAdmiral (1): Coron
Not Voting: Thok, Mastermind of Sin
4 to lynch
because you think that is your best bet to get a lynch because I'm already on to you?ThAdmiral wrote:Well I'm fairly suspicious of coron for fairly obvious reasons. I'm going to go do a read through to a) see if I can dig up any more dirt on coron and b) to look at how players interacted with quagmire through the game.
Quoted for reference, I got to go watch Pirates 3 nowMastermind of Sin wrote:Spectrumvoid:
Early in the game you said you felt Harry_Potter was suspicious, but I'm not seeing a reasoning for it. Would you care to extrapolate on why you felt H_P (not Quagmire) was suspicious? The only thing I've found so far is lurking, but that reasoning came well after you originally said you felt he was scummy.
Later you defend MMoD (not ThAdmiral) by saying that you think lurking is possibly scummy, but not definitely, and FoS the people who are voting him for lurking. What caused your change in stance between H_P's lurking and MMoD's lurking?
Then a few posts later you say that you're going after Pooky for lurking. Why did you change your mind once again?
You claimed Roleblocker and having blocked Mathcam. You then voted for him, but unvoted, saying you believed his claim. However, a few posts later you put him at lynch -1 saying "Since I'm the roleblocker who first brought it up, I'll follow this wagon." Can you explain your actions regarding this? Also, why did you say that you blocked Coron for pushing the Mathcam wagon? Considering that you yourself gave evidence against Mathcam and supported his lynch, I don't see why you claimed suspicion of Coron. Please explain this.
You are avoiding the question. You have not answered why you suspected Harry_Potter, before he was replaced by Quagmire.spectrumvoid wrote:I was suspecting Quagmire, hence I switched him out and asked STD to verify his office. Well, but I was also suspecting STD at that time.
Indeed.On may 02, I first voted quagmire. I also repeated it on may 12 and june 5 though I admit with little explanation.
I see...please try.I really cannot remember what I was thinking about lurking. That sounds like a cop-out answer, but it's true. I will attempt to jog my memory by looking through my notes on monday, but I don't think I noted anything.
Understandable, but why did you unvote him in the first place?Because I felt it would be hypocritical of me to have brought the issue up and not vote him for it. An analogy: Say I claim cop with a guilty investigation on someone. Someone claims he's a (some role that is guilty to investigations even though he's innocent that I can't remember now). I will still vote for him.
Why are you most suspicious of a person who pushed a bandwagon you agreed with? If Quagmire had come up town, would you have attacked Thok and I over everyone else? This doesn't make a lot of sense. Just because he was protown doesn't mean that he wasn't scummy or that the wagon wasn't justified. If you yourself agreed with the wagon at the time, I don't see how you can block him for pushing the bandwagon you thought was on scum until after the fact.I blocked Coron because he pushed the wagon on an innocent. I'm naturally suspicious of the biggest wagoner when the person who gets lynched turned out innocent.
No.ThAdmiral wrote: Save the dragons: if you believe me and coron are scum then you have nothing to lose by putting your money where your mouth is and voting him as well. Just saying.
:goodposting:Save The Dragons wrote:No.ThAdmiral wrote: Save the dragons: if you believe me and coron are scum then you have nothing to lose by putting your money where your mouth is and voting him as well. Just saying.