Mafia 64: The New "C9" - Game over!

[The Central Scrutinizer]

So are you Mafia or SK? Feel like claiming Vig?

[Glork]

One last thought - TCS, NK speculation being scummy or no, If I were the SK, I almost certainly would have axed Glork. Like it or not, that's just true. I am more afraid that people will become convinced I am a mafia member, which I am also not.

....nevermind the fact that there's a fair (though probably not huge) chance I'd draw doc protection at least N1.


TCS, you can cut the BJ/IS act. Nobody's paying any attention to you. Pay normally, please.

[Glork]

EBWODP: *Play normally, please.

[Albert B. Rampage]

What does Glork have to say on TCS/Guardian ?

[Guardian]

And TCS, also, why in hell would I give up at lynch -7. If this is just a ploy please say so and start playing normally, you are just looking more and more scummy to me.

[Glork]

I still find Guardian to be reasonably scummy, and TCS is annoying me beacuse he's spamming and deliberately behaving stupidly, when he complained about BM's behavior earlier.

TCS, in all seriousness, I'd like you to explain in extensive detail why you have chosen to behave this way. Failure to explain yourself or an insufficient/spammy explanation will result in deeper interrogation. I don't know why you've decided to do this, but you're certainly not proving any point; nor are you accomplishing anything other than pissing other people off. Stop it.

[YogurtBandit]

So are you Mafia or SK? Feel like claiming Vig?

Confirm Vote: TCS

You just keep acting like Scum. Its starting to get very aggravating because you've been acting town for the most part for most of the game, but the last 3-4 pages you've gotten worse. Check bout my pbpa of TCS for more details..

[Albert B. Rampage]

Unvote, vote Guardian

Just to put pressure and get a claim.

[Glork]

Albert, do you think Guardian is scum?

[Albert B. Rampage]

Not really.

[YogurtBandit]

Not really.

[Albert B. Rampage]

Not really.

I posted too quick. I think Snitchkin (whatever his name is) is scummiest, but between Guardian and TCS, I trust TCS more. Guardian doesn't appeal to me as a day1 lynch, but I still want a claim to see what happens.

[Glork]

Unvote, Vote: Albert

Die.

[Albert B. Rampage]

Wow, good thing I posted before Glork.

[Albert B. Rampage]

EBWOP

Shteven*

[Glork]

Pushing for claims "because [you] want to see what happens" is scummy and/or absolutely terrible play. Take your pick. Either way,

STOP THE MINDLESS BANDWAGONING MENTALITY OR PERISH IN FLAMES

.

[Albert B. Rampage]

Pushing for claims "because [you] want to see what happens" is scummy and/or absolutely terrible play. Take your pick. Either way,

STOP THE MINDLESS BANDWAGONING MENTALITY OR PERISH IN FLAMES

.

Live with it.

[Glork]

I will. You won't.

[YogurtBandit]

Not really.

I posted too quick. I think Snitchkin (whatever his name is) is scummiest, but between Guardian and TCS, I trust TCS more. Guardian doesn't appeal to me as a day1 lynch, but I still want a claim to see what happens.

Rofl, I'd love for Snitchkin to come so we can give him his new name

[YogurtBandit]

I will. You won't.

*Grabs Popcorn* This is a good arguement.

[Glork]

I should also point out that I have made D1 policy lynches on terrible players before. In Normal 51, I pushed (and got) a policy lynch on a player who insisted on making two-word posts and not contributing. Though he turned out to be pro-town, we won the game eventually anyway. Even if you are pro-town, Albert, I will have

zero

qualms about lynching you. The way I see it, regardless of your alignment, your presence is a detriment to the town. If you're scum, all the better. If not, I'll get over it rather quickly and move on with the game.



...that's not to say that Shteven is not off the hot seat, though. I'm still waiting to hear from him.

[YogurtBandit]

I should also point out that I have made D1 policy lynches on terrible players before. In Normal 51, I pushed (and got) a policy lynch on a player who insisted on making two-word posts and not contributing. Though he turned out to be pro-town, we won the game eventually anyway. Even if you are pro-town, Albert, I will have

zero

qualms about lynching you. The way I see it, regardless of your alignment, your presence is a detriment to the town. If you're scum, all the better. If not, I'll get over it rather quickly and move on with the game.



...that's not to say that Shteven is not off the hot seat, though. I'm still waiting to hear from him.

*Is new*

Policy Lynches are

[YogurtBandit]

I should also point out that I have made D1 policy lynches on terrible players before. In Normal 51, I pushed (and got) a policy lynch on a player who insisted on making two-word posts and not contributing. Though he turned out to be pro-town, we won the game eventually anyway. Even if you are pro-town, Albert, I will have

zero

qualms about lynching you. The way I see it, regardless of your alignment, your presence is a detriment to the town. If you're scum, all the better. If not, I'll get over it rather quickly and move on with the game.



...that's not to say that Shteven is not off the hot seat, though. I'm still waiting to hear from him.

*Is new*

Policy Lynches are ?:?:

Ebwop: I mant to ask a question, not to say they are questionable.

[Glork]

Basically exactly what I'm doing. If somebody insists on behaving in a certain way, and their stubbornness gets to the point where their mere presence in a game -- regardless of whether they are pro-town or not -- then the town lynches them to show that they are serious about their disapproval, and that such behavior will not be tolerated in the future.

The concept of "Lynch All Liars" is a metagame policy which is designed to discourage pro-town players from lying -- and it really does work. Similarly, bandwagon players that you don't particularly suspect for the sake of forcing a claim because you feel like it is a horribly detrimental attitude which Albert has adopted. It's harmful to the town, and any player who insists on being a burden on the town should be disposed of.

[Albert B. Rampage]

Basically exactly what I'm doing. If somebody insists on behaving in a certain way, and their stubbornness gets to the point where their mere presence in a game -- regardless of whether they are pro-town or not -- then the town lynches them to show that they are serious about their disapproval, and that such behavior will not be tolerated in the future.

The concept of "Lynch All Liars" is a metagame policy which is designed to discourage pro-town players from lying -- and it really does work. Similarly, bandwagon players that you don't particularly suspect for the sake of forcing a claim because you feel like it is a horribly detrimental attitude which Albert has adopted. It's harmful to the town, and any player who insists on being a burden on the town should be disposed of.

No! I can change!!

Seriousssly, I promise I will be helpful on Day2. But you guys have all contributed to bore me with all this senseless and baseless metagame attacks. So I am fine with surviving, and I am fine with a lynching.

If I live, there's a strong chance my interest will pick up - but the way your acting now will probably never get to see that, Glork. Too bad.