Robbery! At The Casino (Game Over)

Egg · Post Post #250 (ISO) » Sat Sep 27, 2014 12:46 pm

Didn't even notice ace's vote on me or the fact that he is a double voter

Anyway, ace, you are really voting me just because I have an investigative role? That's kind of shitty. But it would be a dumb scum move because you'd never get 7 players to vote for someone for being a strong power role. So kinda not sure what to think

theaceofspades · Post Post #251 (ISO) » Sat Sep 27, 2014 3:06 pm

i'm not a double voter, came in to point that out. It's a vote count mistake.

I don't believe that you have an investigative role. The sanctimoniousness with which you assume that it's obvious is what bothers me, less than the soft claim itself

Egg · Post Post #252 (ISO) » Sat Sep 27, 2014 3:08 pm

But it is obvious.

Aronis · Post Post #253 (ISO) » Sat Sep 27, 2014 4:57 pm

In post 217, Dr Pants wrote:BBT, Egg, and Shos started by voting Prolapsed, but are now voting with Prolapsed.

Aronis and BBT were on the Shos wagon but are now voting with Shos.

This is stupidly inconsistent. Putting on my Nostradamus hat and saying that Titus is for sure town, and at least 1 scum is for sure in BBT/Egg/Aronis.

My vote on shos was in no way serious and if you consider it as anything but RVS, I will not take you serious for the rest of this game. I vote my scum read, regardless of who, what, or if anyone is voting them.

Aronis · Post Post #254 (ISO) » Sat Sep 27, 2014 5:00 pm

In post 229, Egg wrote:
In post 189, Aronis wrote:
In post 173, Egg wrote:
Vote Double Trouble

Why would Titus want to lurk?

This is a really really really good point. Titus rarely, if ever lurks. Usually she is one of the most active people in game.

VOTE: DoubleTrouble

^this wasn't the point I was making by the way.

Vote Geraintm

For this copout:

In post 170, geraintm wrote:
In post 101, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
In post 100, geraintm wrote:This is going nowhere. I've been waiting for a day for a reason to post and I got nothing.
Random vote will stick where it is till I see a good reason to move it

Another person complaining nothing is happening but doing nothing to progress the game at the same time.

What exactly was you expecting to happen to allow you to post?

No idea really. I find day 1s really hard as I hate moving votes without a great reason. I was just hoping someone to have done something scummy was all...

It's a lame excuse from somebody still random voting. And he acknowledged that he was on the largest wagon at one point which is inconsistent with his apparent cautious style.

And on top of this, find me some town motivation in his ISO. I know it's early, but he seems to be waiting for things to happen ratherthan making them happen or at least interperating what has happened. I don't think you sign up for a mafia game with zero interest in determining who is scum if you draw town.

I really don't see how what you're saying is anything about him is anything but null at this point.

Aronis · Post Post #255 (ISO) » Sat Sep 27, 2014 5:01 pm

In post 236, Desperado wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Aronis

Dr Pants · Post Post #256 (ISO) » Sat Sep 27, 2014 5:03 pm

In post 253, Aronis wrote:
My vote on shos was in no way serious and if you consider it as anything but RVS, I will not take you serious for the rest of this game. I vote my scum read, regardless of who, what, or if anyone is voting them.

Are you saying that Shos was a scum read, or that Shos was an RVS vote? You seem to be saying both here.

Egg · Post Post #257 (ISO) » Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:01 pm

Aronis, it's null that ger has no interest in finding scum? Only scum and bad players don't care about finding scum. I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt.

Double Trouble · Post Post #258 (ISO) » Sat Sep 27, 2014 7:29 pm

In post 251, theaceofspades wrote:i'm not a double voter, came in to point that out. It's a vote count mistake.

I don't believe that you have an investigative role. The sanctimoniousness with which you assume that it's obvious is what bothers me, less than the soft claim itself

No cooking eggs. I believe their claim.

-- Double

Prolapsed Brain · Post Post #259 (ISO) » Sat Sep 27, 2014 9:16 pm

Prod dodge. Off tomorrow, so real thoughts shall be posted.

geraintm · Post Post #260 (ISO) » Sun Sep 28, 2014 4:34 am

In post 180, shos wrote:VOTE: double trouble

Going to try and catch up with the game now, will likely post a whole bunch of random thoughts now. Mostly as notes for myself for later when people start doing more scummish stuff.
With shos, this vote confused me as it looked like it came from nowhere.

geraintm · Post Post #261 (ISO) » Sun Sep 28, 2014 4:35 am

Desperado, not much again to say except I like them defendingme.

geraintm · Post Post #262 (ISO) » Sun Sep 28, 2014 4:37 am

Gray fox - like their post 192 and 199 pick up similar thought to mine on the awkward shos vote.

geraintm · Post Post #263 (ISO) » Sun Sep 28, 2014 4:39 am

Beck, toffee and perfect chaos I have no strong thoughts on any of them. All meh

geraintm · Post Post #264 (ISO) » Sun Sep 28, 2014 4:41 am

The ace of spades - no matter what you think of egg's claim,there is no way they are getting lynched today and so applying a vote is pointless. Once they have made the claim you have to let themselves ru with it for a night. Objection can be raised but voting against them isn't going to go anywhere.

geraintm · Post Post #265 (ISO) » Sun Sep 28, 2014 4:44 am

Aronis I like. Defending me is always good

but apart from that I dont know anything about Titus for the double trouble vote.

geraintm · Post Post #266 (ISO) » Sun Sep 28, 2014 4:46 am

Dr pants. I like the effort they are putting in. There isn't much to actual analyse in the game but I will not be voting for them today as I am looking forward to their input tomorrow.

geraintm · Post Post #267 (ISO) » Sun Sep 28, 2014 4:49 am

Egg: I want to find scum just I am pretty bad at doing it day one. (And day two as well) . Being honest. I don't have a power role like some people....

Egg playing some odd cop gambit I am not familiar with?

geraintm · Post Post #268 (ISO) » Sun Sep 28, 2014 5:00 am

In post 182, Double Trouble wrote:And we hit a record...17 games in a row someone does a day one train...

I've yet to have a forum scum game ever. New nickname: Eternal Townie. *sigh*

-- Double

Off topic: Avatar is up.

This I find as odd as eggs claim.
But their later posts mean I am not going to be voting for them day one either.

geraintm · Post Post #269 (ISO) » Sun Sep 28, 2014 5:03 am

No real thoughts on prolapsed either.
There are a bunch of people I am not going to vote for today.
Double trouble, egg, Dr pants, aronis,

Shos is the person I find worst today so far, and ace of spades is less town than most.

Egg · Post Post #270 (ISO) » Sun Sep 28, 2014 6:02 am

So basically other than Pants, your town reads are the two claims and the person who called you town?

Your reasons for scum reads are kind of meh too...

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #271 (ISO) » Sun Sep 28, 2014 6:22 am

Ace's 56 - I'm interested in this read because Shos himself admitted that he was trolling. How did you find him to be more townie than scummy?

Aronis' 58 and 189 - I don't like either of these votes.

Shos' 85 - Here is your reminder.

Exchange between Beck and PB; 155, 156 and 167 - This sequence of posts doesn't sit right with me. Beck asks PB for some game-related content, given he has time to comment about mod but seemingly no time to play the game. PB follows this up by placing a vote and then proceeds to disappear again after contributing pretty much nothing. Leaning scum on PB.

Ace's 203 - This is a bad vote. I didn't understand it at first but Ace follows up stating he doesn't believe Egg's claim and I'm not really sure what to make of that right now.

In post 229, Egg wrote:And on top of this, find me some town motivation in his ISO. I know it's early, but he seems to be waiting for things to happen ratherthan making them happen or at least interperating what has happened. I don't think you sign up for a mafia game with zero interest in determining who is scum if you draw town.

This looks like a play-style vote. Correct me if I'm wrong.

shos · Post Post #272 (ISO) » Sun Sep 28, 2014 6:30 am

BBT is awfully right. Even I caught that when skimming now.
I will probably fully catch up tomorrow (readinf, not skimming) so mescuzzy once more

Prolapsed Brain · Post Post #273 (ISO) » Sun Sep 28, 2014 6:47 am

In post 264, geraintm wrote:The ace of spades - no matter what you think of egg's claim,there is no way they are getting lynched today and so applying a vote is pointless. Once they have made the claim you have to let themselves ru with it for a night. Objection can be raised but voting against them isn't going to go anywhere.

And that's the thing I

hate

about Day One claims. Scum can do it, if they're reasonably sure they won't be CCed, and they get a free pass.... for several Days if they happen to get lucky. Hate it.

Very tempted to move my vote to Egg, but as said above, pointless.

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #274 (ISO) » Sun Sep 28, 2014 7:11 am

I should also note I don't like geraint's/Gray's posting styles, it will make them seem much busier/more active in the activity overview later in the game.

Gray could have done all his reads in one post and geraint could have got all of his recent posts into one post as well.