In post 1861, Csareo wrote:Urgh, now he's taking my pride hostage.
What a shameful jackass. He acts incompetent 99% of the game and has the most unusual of claims up to this point.
The only reason to believe it is that he copied and pasted it with ease.
I already have. They're blinded by you editing the scum PT.
I stand by my promise. If BBT is town I will permanently self vote.
Now if there was any productive mislynch, it would be this jackass.
In post 1904, Csareo wrote:This is another thing that has me. I once played a game where I pinned a fake claim plot, and the scum couldn't stop gloating that they had me fooled.
To me, BBT is a cocky ass piece of scum who's is a little over the hedge.
Ok skimmed Csareo's ISO. I replaced in here because he and I have a lot in common. I like the guy but he lost his cool here. He has a lot of the same plusses and minuses I do even when stressed. He's dropped the constant reference to military strat which is goid. Now just to get him to detach.
In post 2258, Wake1 wrote:Warnings are something I strive to give any of my players whenever I mod my games. That's one reason why my modding is virtually flawless.
Do you allow mod psychology in your games?
I'm unfamiliar with the term.
He's referring to outguessing the nod and modslips. Setup cracking is ok. Modslips are not.
Hello Titus and welcome to the unholy mess that is this game.
How do you feel about any of the following: JaggedAppliance, Anatole, Green Crayons, Doogal.
(This is my vengeful shot pool, in case you were wondering.)
We're not going to get anything done here with Wake insisting on tearing down a mason claim and a vengeful claim. Outside of policy lynching Wake (which I would be very much against), I think the most productive course of action is for me to take my vig shot and leave 2 flips. Otherwise, we're going to be going into Day 2 with the exact same approach as Day 1.
At this point, I believe the most pro-town course of action would be to get my flip and
show
the entire game how ridiculously wrong Wake is so that the discussion can move on to more produce areas. With any luck, I'll shoot scum; but even if I shoot town, I think 2 town deaths are better than maintaining the current game atmosphere.
I've mulled over the Mason claim and it seems legitimate to me. I won't go into specifics, but I've gone back in the thread and looked at other players activities and there are a couple names that I could see fitting into BBT's mason partner profile. Now, if down the road these people flip anything other than Mason, then I suggest you revisit BBT's claim later. It seems it would be foolish for scum to claim something like "mason" when there's really no one to back him up, though. For these reasons, I'm treating BBT as town.
Do you have any reason not to believe BBT's claim?
Phone posting. Only skimmed the pages since Saturday morning. Back from V/LA and will give some better input later.
I see why a vengeful scum would claim vengeful town, but TTH looks town these pas few days.
I would like her opinion on massive, including why she suspects him and what gave her cold feet.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Personally I feel two Masons in a 13-player game, with a Tracker and Neighbors and whatever else is imbalanced.
This includes a Mason-Neighbor and a Vengeful-Neighbor, Titus.
Methinks somebody's lying. If Masons exist, I doubt there'd be a Cop. If there's a Cop in this game, stay quiet but take the Mason claim with a grain of salt.
