Could you please point to my buddying? And give reason to why its buddying please
Your cutesy all hails, and m'lord statements are clearly directed towards Mantis. Do you think that if you say nice things to him, he'll town read you? I say it's buddying -to a null read non the less.
You say below he could be my scum partner but you say above you understand why Script got defensive. I dont think you can have one with the other.
His defensiveness makes it more likely that he isn't your partner. Scripten read it for what I said. Maybe I should have added in something like Scripten defense seems to be motivated by a town mindset, or something complicated and wordy like that.
Ive already explained that I am speculating on a link (if any) between the two. For a better explanation refer to my post 189. Seems like you are grabbing at straws here. Town doesn't do that
The "straw" that I'm grabbing at here is your towniest town read catches an associative scum read about 3 posts later even though you seem to have no reason to suspect him as being any sort of scum.
In post 250, SABBATHonSABBATH wrote:
Your cutesy all hails, and m'lord statements are clearly directed towards Mantis. Do you think that if you say nice things to him, he'll town read you? I say it's buddying -to a null read non the less.
Are you ignoring my other posts about him? Plus I am just trying to keep the style of the game up. My good sir.
His defensiveness makes it more likely that he isn't your partner. Scripten read it for what I said. Maybe I should have added in something like Scripten defense seems to be motivated by a town mindset, or something complicated and wordy like that.
Wait wait wait. How did what you said translate to what Scripten said???? "Greyfoxx's evaluation of tiershift seems to be clearly pointing a finger at Naz and linking him as scum with his bestest town read." I dont see it. So this really means "He said that your posts lean toward you trying to implicate me as your scum partner (Assuming you are scum) and said that my reaction and push back suggest my innocence." I call B.S. Someone else please give me some insight.
The "straw" that I'm grabbing at here is your towniest town read catches an associative scum read about 3 posts later even though you seem to have no reason to suspect him as being any sort of scum.
Quinoa, stop being useless. Otherwise I will strongly push for your annihilation.
The Kingmaker stays Kingmaker; this is clear through the role descriptions.
In post 219, SABBATHonSABBATH wrote:I'm of the opinion that Mantis is SOLID TOWN. By virtue of being the named D1 king. I'm a little iffy on that because I'm unsure if he was chosen by the mod, or by the kingmaker. Regardless of who he was chosen by, he seems town by play and necessity.
Do you mind explaining this? It makes no sense to me. How is being named King evidence of being town?
In post 267, Nazarene wrote:Quinoa, stop being useless. Otherwise I will strongly push for your annihilation.
The Kingmaker stays Kingmaker; this is clear through the role descriptions.
In post 219, SABBATHonSABBATH wrote:I'm of the opinion that Mantis is SOLID TOWN. By virtue of being the named D1 king. I'm a little iffy on that because I'm unsure if he was chosen by the mod, or by the kingmaker. Regardless of who he was chosen by, he seems town by play and necessity.
Do you mind explaining this? It makes no sense to me. How is being named King evidence of being town?
-A
agree
SoS anyone made king has the chance to be town or scum
Please explain your Nik scumread beyond the completely ridiculous claim that he attempted to execute the king. I do not see why that scumread has remained so implacable.
