InuYasha Mafia (Game Over)

Majiffy · Post Post #8900 (ISO) » Tue Sep 23, 2014 10:36 am

Not gettin' those good vibrations.
Not gettin' all the excitation.

BBmolla · Post Post #8901 (ISO) » Tue Sep 23, 2014 10:44 am

I i i
Don't love the colorful votes you've ma a ade
And the way you've used lyrics to try persua a ade

Majiffy · Post Post #8902 (ISO) » Tue Sep 23, 2014 10:47 am

Wheeeen
I see the number of townflips had
I must admit, I think I'm going mad

BBmolla · Post Post #8903 (ISO) » Tue Sep 23, 2014 11:21 am

Aint picking up scum intentions
I'm lost amongst these contentions
(ooo lynch scum. lynch these scumfucks lynch scum. lynch these scumfucks lynch them. lynch these scum fucks lynch them. lynch these- lynch these scum fucks lynch all scum fucks. lynch them... lynch them!)
Aint picking up scum intentions
I'm lost amongst these contentions
Aint picking up scum intentions
I'm lost amongst these contentions
Aint picking up scum intentions
I'm lost amongst these contentions

Young and Beautiful · Post Post #8904 (ISO) » Tue Sep 23, 2014 1:00 pm

Will you still love me when I'm no longer Young and Beautiful?

Young and Beautiful · Post Post #8905 (ISO) » Tue Sep 23, 2014 1:02 pm

I know you'll love me, I know you will, I know that you will...

Young and Beautiful · Post Post #8906 (ISO) » Tue Sep 23, 2014 1:03 pm

Majiffy! Update your signature! Robbery at the Casino mafia is NOT in signups!

beastcharizard · Post Post #8907 (ISO) » Tue Sep 23, 2014 2:28 pm

In post 8888, Kagami wrote:AD and BC, what are your full role titles?

I am Sango.
Town Human Unpoisonable Townie.

beastcharizard · Post Post #8908 (ISO) » Tue Sep 23, 2014 2:30 pm

In post 8904, Young and Beautiful wrote:Will you still love me when I'm no longer Young and Beautiful?

No, but if you vote with me I will. You should vote with me because I am town.

Young and Beautiful · Post Post #8909 (ISO) » Tue Sep 23, 2014 3:05 pm

How do I know that you are not lying to me?

Majiffy · Post Post #8910 (ISO) » Tue Sep 23, 2014 7:19 pm

In post 8906, Young and Beautiful wrote:Majiffy! Update your signature! Robbery at the Casino mafia is NOT in signups!

Effort.

The Goat · Post Post #8911 (ISO) » Wed Sep 24, 2014 1:47 am

In post 8895, zMuffinMan wrote:what night did goat investigate noddy?

Imply that I'm not doing anything, yet don't bother to do an easy ISO. Nice.

I investigated ns N2. Positive result.

zMuffinMan · Post Post #8912 (ISO) » Wed Sep 24, 2014 1:59 am

In post 8911, The Goat wrote:Imply that I'm not doing anything, yet don't bother to do an easy ISO

how is this even related?

zMuffinMan · Post Post #8913 (ISO) » Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:12 am

so here's something i just remembered

shos said he hadn't been targeted on any night

there was one night where both bb and goat both claimed to have targeted shos and got no result

now we can assume that if a theoretical scum alien-variant JK exists, shos would have at least seen them targeting him but he didn't, so what was going on with the "roleblocks" in this game?

bb clarified that he was actually roleblocked and it wasn't just a lack of result iirc, and goat getting no result as opposed to a negative result (like he claims to have gotten on mist N1) means he had to have been blocked in some way

The Goat · Post Post #8914 (ISO) » Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:23 am

In post 8912, zMuffinMan wrote:
In post 8911, The Goat wrote:Imply that I'm not doing anything, yet don't bother to do an easy ISO

how is this even related?

As I haven't posted much, it's very easy to find where I've posted my results. Repeatedly.

The Goat · Post Post #8915 (ISO) » Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:27 am

In post 8913, zMuffinMan wrote:so here's something i just remembered

shos said he hadn't been targeted on any night

there was one night where both bb and goat both claimed to have targeted shos and got no result

now we can assume that if a theoretical scum alien-variant JK exists, shos would have at least seen them targeting him but he didn't, so what was going on with the "roleblocks" in this game?

bb clarified that he was actually roleblocked and it wasn't just a lack of result iirc, and goat getting no result as opposed to a negative result (like he claims to have gotten on mist N1) means he had to have been blocked in some way

What I find very odd is the phrasing. I was specifically told I got no result, and that my ability didn't work. The word "blocked" was never stated to me verbatim. I'm wondering if this has any significance. I started associating the two things as equivalent in my head, and I'm wondering if that's a bad association to make.

Young and Beautiful · Post Post #8916 (ISO) » Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:31 am

In post 8913, zMuffinMan wrote:so here's something i just remembered

shos said he hadn't been targeted on any night

there was one night where both bb and goat both claimed to have targeted shos and got no result

now we can assume that if a theoretical scum alien-variant JK exists, shos would have at least seen them targeting him but he didn't, so what was going on with the "roleblocks" in this game?

bb clarified that he was actually roleblocked and it wasn't just a lack of result iirc, and goat getting no result as opposed to a negative result (like he claims to have gotten on mist N1) means he had to have been blocked in some way

Yes, I remember this.

So what? What are you trying to say?

- b -

Young and Beautiful · Post Post #8917 (ISO) » Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:32 am

I also do remember that yesterday, both Egg and The Goat claimed blocked as well. It appears that the only constant here is The Goat. Coincidence?

The Goat · Post Post #8918 (ISO) » Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:39 am

In post 8917, Young and Beautiful wrote:I also do remember that yesterday, both Egg and The Goat claimed blocked as well. It appears that the only constant here is The Goat. Coincidence?

I find it odd that I would be blocked three nights in a row. Specifically because giving out information that I find about jewels could conceivably...

The Goat · Post Post #8919 (ISO) » Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:40 am

unvote, vote notscience

The Goat · Post Post #8920 (ISO) » Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:43 am

You sneaky bastige.

Young and Beautiful · Post Post #8921 (ISO) » Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:56 am

I don't follow.

zMuffinMan · Post Post #8922 (ISO) » Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:10 am

In post 8916, Young and Beautiful wrote:What are you trying to say?

just recapping all of the claimed roleblocks

you claim you were roleblocked N1
no one claimed roleblocked N2?
goat and bb both claimed roleblocked N3, both targeting shos, shos claims no one targeted him any of the first 3 nights
goat claimed roleblocked N4
egg and goat claimed roleblocked N5

this is all the known roleblocked claims as far as i can tell

i sincerely doubt scum have two roleblocking abilities (even if we suppose one is coming from the SK and one is coming from group scum) - i sincerely doubt group-scum have a full roleblocker, as well (my theory about the scum team coming in to play with this one, scum is most likely full of limited-shot or limited-in-some-way abilities with probably no goons, so while i believe it's possible scum have the ability to roleblock, i sincerely doubt they can do it every single night)

i think at least one of the "roleblocked" claims is false

zMuffinMan · Post Post #8923 (ISO) » Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:12 am

oh and i suppose no one claimed roleblocked last night but then the only one who claimed to have used an ability theyd know was roleblocked last night is goat so i dont know if that means anything

Young and Beautiful · Post Post #8924 (ISO) » Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:15 am

In post 8922, zMuffinMan wrote:i think at least one of the "roleblocked" claims is false

You don't say.

Anyway, to clarify, the mod didn't say that I got roleblocked N1. It was an assumption that I got roleblocked because my action didn't go through, and obviously I got roleblocked because (every theme game has a roleblocker), but it is not a 100% thing. But yeah, most probably I got roleblocked.