Open 571- Pick Your Poison Game over

Ankamius · Post Post #400 (ISO) » Mon Sep 22, 2014 1:04 pm

And by him, I mean Majiffy.

aphix · Post Post #401 (ISO) » Mon Sep 22, 2014 1:09 pm

In post 395, Krystal Bald wrote:
In post 328, Krystal Bald wrote:
In post 324, aphix wrote:I hate people that defend themselves by saying "I don't do much day one." They tend to continue on to not do anything.

Yeah but why is it scummy, I see town doing that shit every game.

For refs

Yeap. Didn't say it was scummy. But when there is scum, and very anti town activity. It adds up. Thanks though.

Krystal Bald · Post Post #402 (ISO) » Mon Sep 22, 2014 1:20 pm

In post 398, Anatole Kuragin wrote:Can you elaborate on what you find scummy about my walrus friend?

Have you read his posts? You should read his posts.
He's done exactly two things this game: a) pushed a lynch on reinoe for a single shitty reason, and b) called me scum for pointing out his shit reasons.

In post 401, aphix wrote:
In post 395, Krystal Bald wrote:
In post 328, Krystal Bald wrote:
In post 324, aphix wrote:I hate people that defend themselves by saying "I don't do much day one." They tend to continue on to not do anything.

Yeah but why is it scummy, I see town doing that shit every game.

For refs

Yeap. Didn't say it was scummy. But when there is scum, and very anti town activity. It adds up. Thanks though.

What about his post did you find scummy, then?

Alchemist21 · Post Post #403 (ISO) » Mon Sep 22, 2014 2:34 pm

In post 377, Randomnamechange wrote:
In post 358, Krystal Bald wrote:
In post 323, Randomnamechange wrote:Please can people show why their votes are on me rather than stating something which I can't defend against as I genuinely don't understand it.
Fluminator I have a tendency to not do much Day 1. I said this earlier.
Aphix you didn't explain your vote.
Doublade your vote was OMGUS.
Ankamius you said you disliked part of one of my posts. Why did this make you think I was scum.
I think I have 4 votes on me at the moment,
.

rm, if you thought doublade's vote on you was omgus. what made you choose to vote aphix over them?

I thought that aphix was trying to push a lynch on me on BS reasons while doublade was just OMGUSing

In post 359, Krystal Bald wrote:
In post 332, Randomnamechange wrote:@alchemist. I did explain my vote on aphix. I think he is bandwagoning an easy lynch as scum. How is that not scumhunting. I have scumhunted more than gaiden, so surely he is a better place to put your vote? And were you paying no attention when I pointed out my meta? I swear no one is paying atttention to what I say outside of my list read.

why did you bring up gaiden here.

granted.. i am curious about him.. cause um he's not posting at all.

but you referring to content vs no content. gaiden is null

This was in response to alchemist voting me due to a lack of scumhunting. Gaiden was just an example.

The difference between you and Gaiden is that Gaiden isn't really active nor really playing the game (maybe he's busy and should ask to be replaced? I think we do have 1 in the queue.). You, on the other hand, have been more active and made attempts to play the game, but you've played it in a very scummy way.

Btw, I don't think Gaiden will be a good place for my vote, because I don't consider activity or lack of it as alignment indicative. I think it's better for the town to let the mod handle inactives and focus on the bigger fish to fry. I wouldn't suggest going after the inactives unless we run out of good candidates for scum.

In post 381, Fluminator wrote:Is that the reason no one is posting? Haha. I just don't have much time to post on Sundays. I certainly didn't miss much today though.

No post on Sundays. lol

Doublade · Post Post #404 (ISO) » Mon Sep 22, 2014 2:36 pm

It's been three days and I've not looked at this thread at all.

I'll see if I can commit to activity when notscience gets back.

reinoe · Post Post #405 (ISO) » Mon Sep 22, 2014 2:43 pm

In post 404, Doublade wrote:It's been three days and I've not looked at this thread at all.

I'll see if I can commit to activity when notscience gets back.

You're in this game? Could you do something really townie or scummy so I can get a read.

Randomnamechange · Post Post #406 (ISO) » Mon Sep 22, 2014 8:13 pm

Please can someone say if their is a reason for voting me apart from not scumhunting, because I can't defend that. I admitted it.
And I am voting with reasons. I think the person who I am voting is scum.

Anatole Kuragin · Post Post #407 (ISO) » Tue Sep 23, 2014 2:48 am

In post 406, Randomnamechange wrote:Please can someone say if their is a reason for voting me apart from not scumhunting, because I can't defend that. I admitted it.
And I am voting with reasons. I think the person who I am voting is scum.

Your posts seem hesitant to really commit - you're going after lurkers and easy targets.

Randomnamechange · Post Post #408 (ISO) » Tue Sep 23, 2014 4:06 am

You are going after me. I am currently an easy target. Surely that makes you scum? I was generally thinking that active players were town at that point, but now something informative has happened (the wagon on me) I'm starting to notice scummy behaviour in other players.

Anatole Kuragin · Post Post #409 (ISO) » Tue Sep 23, 2014 4:28 am

What a fortuitous event!

aphix · Post Post #410 (ISO) » Tue Sep 23, 2014 4:53 am

In post 408, Randomnamechange wrote:You are going after me. I am currently an easy target. Surely that makes you scum? I was generally thinking that active players were town at that point, but now something informative has happened (the wagon on me) I'm starting to notice scummy behaviour in other players.

http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Omgus

Ankamius · Post Post #411 (ISO) » Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:13 am

In post 408, Randomnamechange wrote:You are going after me. I am currently an easy target. Surely that makes you scum? I was generally thinking that active players were town at that point, but now something informative has happened (the wagon on me) I'm starting to notice scummy behaviour in other players.

Go on...

Randomnamechange · Post Post #412 (ISO) » Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:24 am

In post 410, aphix wrote:
In post 408, Randomnamechange wrote:You are going after me. I am currently an easy target. Surely that makes you scum? I was generally thinking that active players were town at that point, but now something informative has happened (the wagon on me) I'm starting to notice scummy behaviour in other players.

http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Omgus

Im not saying anatole is scum, im daying that by his logic he is.

Anatole Kuragin · Post Post #413 (ISO) » Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:42 am

Yeah but my logic tends to lead to lynching scum and yours advocates lynching lurkers and the other biggest lynch besides yourself. A self-preservation motive fits there.

Anatole Kuragin · Post Post #414 (ISO) » Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:45 am

In post 413, Anatole Kuragin wrote:Yeah but my logic tends to lead to lynching scum and yours advocates lynching lurkers and the other biggest lynch besides yourself.

this is a dumb statement

Matsumi Sisters · Post Post #415 (ISO) » Tue Sep 23, 2014 6:18 am

So Ankamius and Duoblade why haven't you pegged me for my inactivity despite me usually being less active as scum than town?
I had my reasons for being inactive, but i'm surprised that you 2 have been ignoring it...

- Kuro

Ankamius · Post Post #416 (ISO) » Tue Sep 23, 2014 6:29 am

I only use meta reasoning for reads when I'm reasonably sure that I'm correct. pieguy's playstyle is very black and white between alignments, which is why I'm confident I can read him. I don't think we've played in enough games for me to get a sense of the same for you.

Matsumi Sisters · Post Post #417 (ISO) » Tue Sep 23, 2014 7:02 am

If it's so black and white, then how come you're wrong?

- Kuro

Ankamius · Post Post #418 (ISO) » Tue Sep 23, 2014 7:48 am

I'm giving your slot the benefit of the doubt. The slot is still a scumread, but I'm not going to push it for a while.

Ankamius · Post Post #419 (ISO) » Tue Sep 23, 2014 7:48 am

That question was really bad, though.

Fluminator · Post Post #420 (ISO) » Tue Sep 23, 2014 8:09 am

Reino: You seem to have an obsession with Alchemist being scum and you seen to be basing everything off one post. Are there any other posts that you find scummy about him? I find he is one of my stronger town reads. And what's your opinion on Randommidget?

Fluminator · Post Post #421 (ISO) » Tue Sep 23, 2014 8:18 am

In post 392, notscience wrote:Sorry guys been mourning.

I'll pause the DL if you want until I send out prods/get all VCs current.

No problem. Real life take priority. It would be appreciated to get replacements for Clusk and Gaiden before day phase ends. (Or that they start posting)

SXTLHGaiden · Post Post #422 (ISO) » Tue Sep 23, 2014 8:24 am

i ain't getting replaced.

Fluminator · Post Post #423 (ISO) » Tue Sep 23, 2014 8:27 am

In post 394, Krystal Bald wrote:
In post 340, aphix wrote:READ MY POST. I ask you a direct question. You state you can't quote posts from you phone and continue ignoring the question. Guess what. Even from a phone you can write [ post ] [ /post ]. I know I do that. Then stating I didn't give reason. Which is an indicator you aren't reading my post.

I am astounded that I am the only one trying to lynch you rn.
BTW you never answered my question. Were you posting from a phone or something?

Do you want to lynch him this day? Or was that a more general statement saying you think he should be lynched soon?

Aphix: Do you have any town reads?

Fluminator · Post Post #424 (ISO) » Tue Sep 23, 2014 8:28 am

In post 422, SXTLHGaiden wrote:i ain't getting replaced.

OK. Can you give us a reads list or are you too busy atm?