In post 1095, TellTaleHeart wrote:@Anatole:
It's less of a "I find (such and such)
individual
posts scummy" and more of "I find the pattern your activity makes scummy."
So far this game, you very much like to stick to facts and point out obviously bad arguments (criticizing BBT's "scum slip" argument comes to mind). This isn't scummy in and of itself, but then I feel like with the people you
do
push, your analysis is on a very superficial level. Take GreyICE.
I went and took a look at GreyICE's previous games to see if he actually does tend to flake out as scum and the one I found was this one
Sleepy Hollow. He seemed plenty active in that game as scum. I also think he could have recovered from the gaffe since, at least as far as I recall, plenty of people (myself included) were ready to forgive him for it.
Why would you forgive him for it without knowing anything about his thought process or motivation? I get that you may not give a shit since it's not you he was baselessly trying to murder, but you don't think it's a little bit strange that the player went through the trouble of researching my games and
completely lied about them
? If such a spectacular attempt at descrediting someone failed, wouldn't you just say fuck it, I'll let my replacement come in and get instantly whitewashed? It rubs me the wrong way and now we'll never know what the fuck he was thinking.
In post 1098, Flubbernugget wrote: In post 1089, Anatole Kuragin wrote: In post 849, Green Crayons wrote:@wake, Anatole:
you two, along with Jagged, are the only players who aren't voting for either Csareo or BBT. I'm curious as to your thoughts about both wagons, and why your vote is where it is (Anatole on Jagged (replacing GreyICE), and wake on nobody, as of last VC).
BBT made lots of bad votes. He wasn't deliberately dishonest and he continued doing it after the spotlight was on him - that doesn't strike me as scum dropping convenient votes to get wagons started, it strikes me as an overzealous, overreactive nub honestly. This play-style has been consistent of him all game. GreyICE did one scummy as fuck thing then completely dropped off when called on it.
What about the gamestate do you see changing since your last set of posts here?
I don't understand, what changed since two posts ago?
Since
701. There's about a 300 post interval between that post and your next post.
Well what exactly are we supposed to ask him about it? "Hey, you scum bro?"
Am I "him" here? If you find something I'm doing scummy or deserving of more attention I figured you'd have a reason why or something in particular that requires a "spotlight?" So what is it?
I have no means of getting additional information in reference to GreyICE's gaffe but I'm assuming by the way you speak of it there is a way. Could you enlighten me here?
I kinda touched on the GreyICE thing already - having an alignment-unknown GreyICE explain what he was thinking would be pretty telling of his motivation.
Most of the last 300 pages have been more mudslinging between csareo and BBT and me-tooing and vague assertions by at least you and TTH. This "you should put some pressure" or "we should put the spotlight" stuff seems really counter-productive and like you're trying to shift suspicion for no specific reason.