Mmkay. I'll use the same system...
A Papaya wrote:I'll kick this off.
Random Vote: McStab
Post 2. Might be useful later.
A Papaya wrote:Nekka-Lucifer wrote:A Papaya wrote:Xdaamno wrote:Anybody got, uh, anything to say? XD
Not really.
OMG I SAID SOMETHING
Extremely funny, oh well... this starts off chat and finds mafia
I'll start it, ehh who
is
townie? Be honest......
So you're saying that you aren't?
Post 4. The last sentence is actually a town tell for me. Scum are usually too careful to make that kind of ambigious joke.
A Papaya wrote:Xdaamno wrote:Nekka-Lucifer wrote:A Papaya wrote:Nekka-Lucifer wrote:A Papaya wrote:Xdaamno wrote:Anybody got, uh, anything to say? XD
Not really.
OMG I SAID SOMETHING
Extremely funny, oh well... this starts off chat and finds mafia
I'll start it, ehh who
is
townie? Be honest......
So you're saying that you aren't?
Yes, I am a townie.... It's just starting the conv, and don't quote this, too many quotes
Yes, we know it was starting the conv, I got a half-sarcastic feeling from Papaya's post
So, our first implied roleclaim; vanilla townie?
And, finally, don't qu... oh, nevermind.
Bah, there's no way to prove that you're a vanilla townie through a role claim. So I don't know why NL tried.
5th post. Waffling on a little. May be usefu later.
A Papaya wrote:Nekka-Lucifer wrote:There's always one....
I'm not going to say anything important, I just want to start off a new post quote link, the other one is too long...
Always one what? Vanilla Townie? Not ALWAYS...
6th. Seems a little obvious there (probably) won't be exactly one vanilla townie, but I don't think this is inherently a scum tell.
A Papaya wrote:Xdaamno wrote:No, I think he was making a smart-arse comment about us being childish
In which case he should of said 'There's always
two
'
Meh, well, in this game, it seems the only way to get a discussion going is to act childish...so it isn't that bad of a thing. Anyway, it's childish to vote for someone because they FoSed you in another game, which is why NL voted for me.
7th. This catches my eye a little. He dosen't say what he meant by the statement, leaving us to assume it was being 'childish', and that means he must of changed his opinion.
A Papaya wrote:Who cares about the difference of the post count? Why are you in such a hurry to lynch?
10th. Possible scum tell, trying to act like the good guy, strongly opposing a single thing good for the scum, while possibly taking advantage or others and making himself seem good.
That's one theory, anyway.
A Papaya wrote:The only reason I haven't voted NL yet is that he's always extremely scummy...and that's why I think he just sucks at Mafia. Which is also a good reason to lynch someone.
Vote: N-L
13th. Seeming very scummy here; why is sucking at mafia a reason for a lynch? It wouldn't be hard to, if Nekka is a sucky pro-towner, convince him not to do stupid thigns such as vote randomly in lylo. At the moment there's nothing you really must or musn't do, so he's most harmful at this stage.
A Papaya wrote:Unvote: N-L
He's new. He just PMed me about how he didn't think I was scum, which isn't allowed. And that means his new, not awesome. Don't lynch him.
Either that or he's like the awesomest person ever, which in that case we're screwed anyhow.
Strange. Why not lynch him? He's confirmed
new
, not scum. PMing you dosen't make a difference; either alignment could do it.
And, what's this about awesomeness? Why would he be awesome for breaking the rules?
A Papaya wrote:I have no idea who to vote for, no one sees that scummy. So I'm going to watch the discussion develop...but IH does seem the must scummy to me, so far.
Possible backseat driving; a scum tell. Suspects IH but dosen't vote, might be useful later.
A Papaya wrote:I'll explain my logic now, Fletcher.
This is my opinion.
Nekka Lucifer is an idiot, IMO. He doesn't help at all, and in every other game he is in, I get the impression that he is scum. He just isn't that good at mafia. Therefore, it's most likely he'll end up doing something stupid, even as a townie, and we'll waste a lynch later in the game, when it matters more, on him. That's why I wanted him out of the way now.
Boo.
Still, strange logic. Looks slightly off.
A Papaya wrote:@No Lynch:
It's a stupid idea. Because if we don't lynch anyone at all today, we're going to be in the same spot as we were, minus players from nightkills. It's lose-lose.
FOS: Everyone who voted No Lynch
Good point, but it's an ambigious tell.
Overall, there's several scum tells against A Papaya, but to be honest, I'm not sure he's scum. Anyone I reviewed I'm sure I could find something scummy in, and I haven't noticed many (if any) inherent scum psychological tells.