and are you going to ignore my response to this you slimy scumball?
In post 532, Dr Pants wrote:he reason of course that I 180'd my read on you was your reaction to me voting Bullish. I could only see that as you realizing that there are votes on your scum buddy, and you panicking.
In post 574, Dr Pants wrote:You really think, that as Blue GF, I got the red GF to claim, and of all things, bussed my partner instead of ANYONE else, and that he voted me, instead of ANYONE else, knowing it could turn an easy win into an easy loss?
In post 575, FakedBlogger wrote:and are you going to ignore my response to this you slimy scumball?
In post 532, Dr Pants wrote:he reason of course that I 180'd my read on you was your reaction to me voting Bullish. I could only see that as you realizing that there are votes on your scum buddy, and you panicking.
Your response was that your vote had nothing to do with Bullish. This is half true, your reasons for voting me dont include my push against bullish. However, you sided with bullish, called him town multiple times, etc. Its less about what you said about Bullish, which was very little, and more to do with the fact that your moves highly suggest that you are bullish's partner.
Lets look at some interesting evidence: NJ's self voting wagon.
The people on the wagon at the time of its height are: Naked Jogger, Espresso Jet, Aphix, and Flubbernugget. Bullish didn't vote you here. Why?
In post 574, Dr Pants wrote:You really think, that as Blue GF, I got the red GF to claim, and of all things, bussed my partner instead of ANYONE else, and that he voted me, instead of ANYONE else, knowing it could turn an easy win into an easy loss?
Thats unbelievably stupid.
As town you would've been extremely paranoid about his claim because the claim doesn't serve for anything else but get tension off by sacrificing the game.
It wouldn't have made any sense for you as town to trust it. Why did you and vote Bullish instead... so quickly too!!!! Who was pretty much null because he was too fucking scummy to be scum. Eek could have been scum, Flubber could have been fakeclaiming the opposite color of scum. I could've been scum and you just vote for Bullish 1 2 3 ??! EXPLAIN!!!!!!!!!
Additionally, if you and Eek are the townies, then why did Bullish only put townies as his town reads? Why not put me, his supposed partner, as a town read?
In post 575, FakedBlogger wrote:and are you going to ignore my response to this you slimy scumball?
In post 532, Dr Pants wrote:he reason of course that I 180'd my read on you was your reaction to me voting Bullish. I could only see that as you realizing that there are votes on your scum buddy, and you panicking.
Your response was that your vote had nothing to do with Bullish. This is half true, your reasons for voting me dont include my push against bullish. However, you sided with bullish, called him town multiple times, etc. Its less about what you said about Bullish, which was very little, and more to do with the fact that your moves highly suggest that you are bullish's partner.
WTF are you talking about. Look again
In post 577, Dr Pants wrote:
Lets look at some interesting evidence: NJ's self voting wagon.
The people on the wagon at the time of its height are: Naked Jogger, Espresso Jet, Aphix, and Flubbernugget. Bullish didn't vote you here. Why?
In post 384, Bullish wrote:If I had to choose between who the other townie is (out of NJ and Milk), I'd say Naked Jogger.
We can't lynch another townie, and we can't lynch the red godfather.
Hows this for a you/Bullish connection?
I would never have let Bullish townread me if I was his scumbuddy, knowing how shitty he was playing .. I would've told him to townread you. Like you did
In post 574, Dr Pants wrote:You really think, that as Blue GF, I got the red GF to claim, and of all things, bussed my partner instead of ANYONE else, and that he voted me, instead of ANYONE else, knowing it could turn an easy win into an easy loss?
Thats unbelievably stupid.
As town you would've been extremely paranoid about his claim because the claim doesn't serve for anything else but get tension off by sacrificing the game.
It wouldn't have made any sense for you as town to trust it. Why did you and vote Bullish instead... so quickly too!!!! Who was pretty much null because he was too fucking scummy to be scum. Eek could have been scum, Flubber could have been fakeclaiming the opposite color of scum. I could've been scum and you just vote for Bullish 1 2 3 ??! EXPLAIN!!!!!!!!!
Your going back and forth on your stance on Bullish. I believe this statement sums it up nicely:
In post 571, FakedBlogger wrote:Bullish naked voted the mislynch and had pretty much the shittiest town cred
Interesting that this is your opinion now, when yesterday you called Bullish town multiple times. Bullish fit the profile of what I was looking for in a scummy player. He lurked extensively, and pushed wagons that flipped town.
In post 580, FakedBlogger wrote:
He didn't vote you either .. why?
---------------------------------
I would never have let Bullish townread me if I was his scumbuddy, knowing how shitty he was playing .. I would've told him to townread you. Like you did
Middle edited out, because this is just gold. I told Bullish to townread me? Bullish didn't vote me?
^ If that's funny I don't want your recommendation for comedy movies. Like you did telling him to townread me - obviously.
In post 579, Dr Pants wrote:Additionally, if you and Eek are the townies, then why did Bullish only put townies as his town reads? Why not put me, his supposed partner, as a town read?
Ok Spamts, this is where I draw the line. I've answered pretty much everything and you're being scummy as shit right now. Whoever a scummy Bullish townreads will look scummy so that's why he didn't townread you.
And still you won't talk about the claim. You have nothing to argue about just who Bullish was voting and you keep weeping it up like but I've explained it thoroughly and you are looking increasingly ridiculous ignoring it.
You're acting like you know I'm scum. I know you're scum but I don't act like I don't need to prove that to Eek who is going to make the final call whether I win or loose.
In post 556, My Milked Eek wrote:It's easier to push a lynch on flubber in lylo than it is on you, nj. That's because how I played yesterday: slowly (and unpredictable up to my vote) to voting bullish yesterday. Keeping us two around for pants scum would be an uncertainty while voting flubber out last is a certainty.
btw, this actually isnt correct. If I was blue scum, and lynched town NJ today, then you would know i was blue scum, and you could choose to give the win to flubber instead of me. The easy way to win would be to actually lynch Flubber today.
I'm leaving on a holiday in 26 hours. The flight will be for 10 hours so I'll be V/LA for the weekend/Saturday. After that I should be able to post at least once a day.
I really wanted to keep my word, but Eek wants to play it safe.