Mini Normal 1609: The Case Of Doctor Pepper (Game Over)

[Csareo]

So, you use meta to support your argument, but you disregard any meta that completely contradicts the case you're trying to push right? This, this is why meta is such a shit tool for scum-hunting. It's so subjective.

I didn't use meta. ATE is not a meta tell, it's a general scum tell.

I've read enough of your past games to know your meta is off.

Meta is an okay tool. When you play with people for a long time, you can tell when something is off.
I'm using the meta change as more of a "supporting reason" on why we should lynch you.

This is you not using meta then?

You responded to a quote regarding ATE. Which is a general scum tell that has nothing to do with meta.

[BlueBloodedToffee]

Regardless, you're still using meta to support my lynch right?

I'm asking why you're ignoring meta that contradicts your case.

[Csareo]

Regardless, you're still using meta to support my lynch right?

I'm asking why you're ignoring meta that contradicts your case.

What the hell are you talking about? What contradicts my case?
99% of my case is supported by non-meta reasons.

[BlueBloodedToffee]

Wow, you're so difficult.

You said you were using meta to support your push for my lynch. I quoted this.

I then asked you earlier, and I am asking again now, why you're ignoring meta that contradicts your case. Such as when I pointed you to Newbie 1495 where I was scum and played nothing like I am playing this game.

If you're going to use meta to support your push for my lynch, you should be able to justify it.

[Green Crayons]

CRAYONS IT'S A TRAP

@Crayons:

NOOOOOO I TOLD YOU IT WAS A TRAP GET OUT OF THERE NOW

Aw, man. I thought you were just referencing the pop culture phenomenon of a rubber suited crustacean, which is never not funny.

[Green Crayons]

The fact that greencrayons and ruffling refuse to elaborate on BBT show's he's being protected.

lol, I've elaborated on BBT, glad you're ~*~ READING THE THREAD ~*~.

w/r/t BBT:

Everything about BBT reads to me as over-excited town so I don't plan on voting him unless some new shit comes to light. It's also unlikely if he's town that he has another role to claim besides neighbor so it's probably a dead end road.

Wouldn't over excited town be less defensive and more tunnel-y?

I would think it would depend on the player. He seemed genuinely upset he was outed by his neighbor and I think

he thinks

he keeps seeing all of these scum tells and is going after them.

You also appear to now be complaining that Ruffling isn't answering on BBT's behalf. Kind of a Catch-22, because it's pretty poor play for someone (Ruffling) to jump in and address things before the player (BBT) to whom the comments/questions are addressed be able to respond.


Here, I'll add another reason to my vote: you're grasping at all the straws to vilify those who disagree with your BBT "suspicions." Yeah, the scare quotes are there on purpose, because your stated bases to lynch BBT are bad.

[DoctorPepper]

searching for a GreyICE replacement
Omph replaces scrambles
GreenCrayons replaces rambler.

[DoctorPepper]

Vote Count 1.05

BlueBloodedToffee(5)

– TellTaleHeart, Flubbernugget, Csareo, Boonskiies, Doogal121

Boonskiies(2)

– massive, BlueBloodedToffee

Csareo(3)

– Omph, The Rufflig, Green Crayons

Anatole Kuragin(1)

– GreyICE

GreyICE(1)

– Anatole Kuragin

Not Voting(1)

–Wake88

With 13 alive, it's 7 to lynch
New deadline is on Sunday, September 28, 2014, 11:00 AM {(expired on 2014-09-28 11:00:00)}

Mod notes:

No Vote History.[/area][/color]

[Omph]

*walks into the room with a jacket slung over her shoulder and puts one leg up on a random desk*

Hello, I'm your scrambles sub for the rest of the game.

Now I'm not your typical lamer replacee who just waltzes into the thread making a big ass post complete with chronological boring commentary of no value on mundane things. *winks at Green Crayons* Nah. I'm one of those cool cat replacements who just goes with the flow, man. I like to SHAKE THINGS UP a little.

I'll begin by commenting on every little thing while reading posts in reverse order.

[Omph]

Wowza! Post 658 is the towniest thing I've ever read.

But more seriously, I'll get through this in a little bit. I've read bits and pieces of the ongoing game before replacing in but not the whole thing.

[TellTaleHeart]

I'm one of those cool cat replacements who just goes with the flow, man.

Far out, man!

So duuuuude, what's your deal with Green Crayons, man? You think he's trippin'?

[Doogal121]

@0mph: FOS for buddying yourself in 659.



@Wake and AK, Who would you be comfortable lynching and why are you both reserving your votes?

[Doogal121]

@0mph: Your join date is this week. Are you an alt? Are you a newbie to this forum? If so, have you played elsewhere? What is your general experience.

[Anatole Kuragin]

@0mph: FOS for buddying yourself in 659.



@Wake and AK, Who would you be comfortable lynching and why are you both reserving your votes?

I wanted to hear from GreyICE but it looks like that ship has sailed. Rufflig was my second choice but I need to figure out why again.

[massive]

Respond to my case. Why the hell did you vote for me over an associative tell.
You seem certain my intention was to buddy with a townie, yet this only makes sense if...
1. Wake is proven town
2. Csareo is proven scum
3. Csareo's intention was to be apart of a town bloc

Let's say I'm suspicious of you -- so I already believe 2. Since I believe 2, I believe that YOU at least know that 1 is true also. How far of a leap is 3 at that point? You are presenting this as HARD FACTS but we never know anything as a HARD FACT, and I would expect that if you voted based only on HARD FACTS that you would not play much Mafia.

I think you scum slipped, and hard.

Who is this directed at?

[Flubbernugget]

CRAYONS IT'S A TRAP

@Crayons:

NOOOOOO I TOLD YOU IT WAS A TRAP GET OUT OF THERE NOW

Aw, man. I thought you were just referencing the pop culture phenomenon of a rubber suited crustacean, which is never not funny.

Every time someone gets into an argument with Csaero, baby jesus gets smothered with a pillow in an alternate universe.

[Wake1]

I'll be V/LA until Monday, 9/22. Will be working a live-in shift for a client. Will take 3.5 days. I don't know if there's wi-fi.

[Csareo]

Wow, you're so difficult.

You said you were using meta to support your push for my lynch. I quoted this.

I then asked you earlier, and I am asking again now, why you're ignoring meta that contradicts your case. Such as when I pointed you to Newbie 1495 where I was scum and played nothing like I am playing this game.

If you're going to use meta to support your push for my lynch, you should be able to justify it.

Will you just fucking tell me what meta contradicts my case?
I didn't bring newbie 1495 up, you did.

I don't consider meta evidence that the person who we're discussing gives me. That's like saying "I'm town because I played like I am in X"

[BlueBloodedToffee]

Will you just fucking tell me what meta contradicts my case?
I didn't bring newbie 1495 up, you did.

I don't consider meta evidence that the person who we're discussing gives me. That's like saying "I'm town because I played like I am in X"

Yeah, so this just proves my whole point about meta being subjective and a shit scum-hunting tool.

You're saying you're using meta to support your case. What meta is this? Tell me what meta you're using.

You're telling me to tell you what meta contradicts your case. Then when I point you in the direction of meta that contradicts your case, you reply with 'lulz, I'm not using meta that you point me to coz that meta contradicts my case and means I can't use meta to support my case on you'.

I'm going to vote for you again now because I forgot you slipped and you're tunnelling pretty badly.

VOTE: Csareo

[Csareo]

and I would expect that if you voted based only on HARD FACTS that you would not play much Mafia.

Did you hear what I said about speculation? All lynches are based on it, but there is a degree of supporting evidence that can back a theory.
A theory that has no supporting evidence or "reason" isn't a very wise theory.

There is nothing to support greencrayon's theory, and I explained earlier why it wouldn't make sense for scum. Now why are we even considering some bullshit associative tell on D1?

[Csareo]

Oh my fucking.......... this idiot....... this ignorant, foolish idiot, has flipped votes again.
Rage quitting for awhile.

[BlueBloodedToffee]

At least I'm consistent...right?

[Csareo]

Well, first, let me ask this.
You're voting me because I made, in your eyes, a false statement?
Reality check, being wrong isn't a scum tell.

I want this idiot to die. I almost moved my vote off him several times, but every time I go to post an unvote, he does some stupid shit like this again. I am "just" scum reading him over Greencrayons, do alone to the sheer magnitude of scum tells taking place.

[BlueBloodedToffee]

Oh hey, you're still here.

Can you respond to 668 now?

[Csareo]

No, you're not consistent. It's wishy washy voting, with a classic touch of ultra reaction.
You're trying to join any wagon that has any chance of lynching.... that isn't you.

Name one thing you've done to hunt scum this game? Name one thing you've done besides defend yourself, and act like a complete and utter fool?