In post 990, Aegor wrote:Unless Pasch can tell me why, I do not care that his ISO read of NM led to a scumread. Again, there seems to be no case. Your own scumread stems from a flawed and tenuous night kill analysis.
I am more concerned about NM's reaction to the wagon on him.
In post 1037, fuzzybutternut wrote:^This right here proves that you had no interest in pursuing his lynch, meaning you didn't find him as mafia, yet you still hammered him
You spent the entire day yesterday trying to advocate my lynch, saying that you "didn't think NM was as scummy as me," yet, when it came time for NM to be lynched, you were right there to do it. And then, after the hammer, you tried to push the blame onto someone else in the event he wasn't scum.
i.e. You're scum, and you should be todays lynch.
I shouldn't have to ISO anyone to find out your reads. If your reads are strong enough, you should have no problem saying them.
In post 1020, Aegor wrote:I think...
VOTE: Not_Mafia
In post 670, Not_Mafia wrote:Why is Desp wolf and not just scum? And you're saying this is a shit lynch because there was no resistance, when I've pointed out why it should have gone through with no resistance and how this says nothing about the wagon itself. Bulge will be lynch fodder and a sticking point for every day he's still here, and we could have assumed a mafia kill like 4 pages ago, instead we're splitting wagons multiple times for no apparent reason.
If he flips town, it is on you. I wanted obvmaf fuzzy.
In post 1038, Paschendale wrote:
I find you and Fuzzy towny. I don't find Aegor and Riddleton towny.
In post 1040, fuzzybutternut wrote:You thought it was possible he was WW but you'd still rather lynch someone you thought was mafia.. cool, so you are scum.
^Here's the "false" part. If you can't see the problem there, you should re-read.
So you're saying your reads haven't changed since the last time you posted them? How can that be if you're actively scum-hunting?
In post 1043, Bins wrote:As for other team possibilities, I will look at Aegor/Riddleton. For now, Aegor, can you give me your read on Riddleton? I don't think you've even mentioned him.
In post 1044, Aegor wrote:What are you even talking about? Why would mafia not want to eliminate the only faction that is capable of nightkilling them
In post 1047, Paschendale wrote:Bins and I, the rather uncontested town, should probably vote last, after everyone else. That way there can't be a coordinated quicklynch. Since two out of the three other players are scum, there can't be an opportunity for a quicklynch unless someone votes for themself. Not seeing that happen.
Bins and I, the rather uncontested town, should probably vote last, after everyone else. That way there can't be a coordinated quicklynch. Since two out of the three other players are scum, there can't be an opportunity for a quicklynch unless someone votes for themself. Not seeing that happen.
In post 1046, fuzzybutternut wrote:You specifically said "NMcouldbe a werewolf, but I'd rather lynch this guy, whocouldbe mafia. The fact that you would rather lynch a suspected mafia over a suspected werewolf in a setup like this is scummy as hell. You'd rather leave someone who has a nightkill alive than someone who can't do anything, ever.
Your readsshouldchange if you're actively scum hunting properly.
Regardless of where your actual vote ends, your reads should fluctuate,unless you know something someone else doesn't.
You've basically tunneled on me since you joined this game, giving no chance that anyone else could be possible scum. If you're going to claim town, at least play like one.