Battle Mage: 4 (CES Glork Thesp Patrick)
MrBuddyLee: 2 (Mgm CrashTextDummie)
Cogito Ergo Sum: 1 (Battle Mage)
Not voting: MBL
Somehow, I very much doubt that the first two people to put CDB on the hotseat were both of his scumpartners, lol. When scum gets lynched, town uses the lynch info as one of the primary pieces of evidence for determining alignments. It doesn't appear that BM factored that in. Nightfall did and chose to find Glork suspect and Thesp innocent.Battle Mage wrote:I could see a great number of potential scumpairs, including the obvious CES-Glork, Glork-Thesp. I don’t think CES and Thesp could be scumbuddies.
so you consider it impossible that scum can lynch other scum?MrBuddyLee wrote:The CDB-wagon started with Thesp-Glork-MBL. And yet Thesp and Glork are two of BM's top three suspects:
Somehow, I very much doubt that the first two people to put CDB on the hotseat were both of his scumpartners, lol. When scum gets lynched, town uses the lynch info as one of the primary pieces of evidence for determining alignments. It doesn't appear that BM factored that in. Nightfall did and chose to find Glork suspect and Thesp innocent.Battle Mage wrote:I could see a great number of potential scumpairs, including the obvious CES-Glork, Glork-Thesp. I don’t think CES and Thesp could be scumbuddies.
In fact, in the same post where BM slipped and said Mgm was proven innocent by an investigation, he lists Thesp as a top suspect. I don't see how any of this reflects a read of the thread with genuine curiosity. It's more likely that he knows the alignments and is tailoring his analysis to them.
This is probably what's called a strawman, though that's maybe only for when you subtly change what someone said. Nobody is saying that being on a scum lynch confirms a player as protown. What people are saying is that starting a wagon on confirmed scum tends to be be a town tell. The tone and manner in which Glork/Thesp went about it did not feel like busing.Battle Mage wrote:so you consider it impossible that scum can lynch other scum?
dont be silly. this is a game with experienced players. the skill at which the scum is playing is evident in the fact that 2 of them are still alive, with all power roles dead. It wouldnt surprise me 1 bit if Glork/Thesp bussed their buddy.
forgive me if im wrong here, but being on the wagon when scum is lynched, DOES NOT CONFIRM YOU PROTOWN. If thats your mentality, you might as well go home now. :p
I think the point being made was the vast difference between your assessments of MgM and your assessment of Thesp, the two investigated players.Battle Mage wrote:oh and btw, can people stop referring to bits of my analysis which are wrong as 'slips'. ive already explained (and its evident to anyone reading it) that those were my thoughts at the time. My first thought was, "ah, MgM must have come up protown then". the gf bit became obvious later, and whilst it is true that MgM isnt 'confirmed' town, as i had said, there is little way in which that mistake could be construed as scummy.
Yes, that's what I'm saying.BM wrote:so you consider it impossible that scum can lynch other scum?
Why should I, when I see little worthwhile in BM's posts, but find something incredibly condemning in his predecessor's? PBPA's are highly overrated, and often more self-congratulatory than actually useful.MrBuddyLee wrote:Thesp bases his current vote entirely on Nightfall's words and has given us no substantial analysis of BM's.
You're forgetting that in my case the investigator came out and revealed their result. Thesp's investigation is likely but not confirmed. Talking about us as "the two investigated players" assumes we're at an equal 'cleared' level which is simply not true.Patrick wrote:I think the point being made was the vast difference between your assessments of MgM and your assessment of Thesp, the two investigated players.
Not everything requires further comment, you know. I'd much rather spend those words on something useful, like revealing your inconsistencies.MrBuddyLee wrote:Mgm latches onto the post 595 argument and gives no further comment other than thatBM'sNightfall'sanalysis was "decent".
I disagree with this. But maybe that's because I'm one of the few people who knows what to look for when making an all-encompassing PBPA.Thesp wrote:....and often more self-congratulatory than actually useful.
This might require some explanation. BM is on the top of the vote count and with the serious possibility of him getting lynched he's getting all the attention, which means other people slip off the radar.Mgm wrote:Not everything requires further comment, you know. I'd much rather spend those words on something useful, like revealing your inconsistencies.MrBuddyLee wrote:Mgm latches onto the post 595 argument and gives no further comment other than thatBM'sNightfall'sanalysis was "decent".
This is a nice bit of misdirection in itself. Call the accusation a misdirect and no one will notice you're not actually defending yourself against it. I'm still waiting.Mgm, nice misdirect. Do you think it's reasonable for BM to find the entire CDB-wagon scummy?
IN YOUR OPINION.Patrick wrote:This is probably what's called a strawman, though that's maybe only for when you subtly change what someone said. Nobody is saying that being on a scum lynch confirms a player as protown. What people are saying is that starting a wagon on confirmed scum tends to be be a town tell. The tone and manner in which Glork/Thesp went about it did not feel like busing.Battle Mage wrote:so you consider it impossible that scum can lynch other scum?
dont be silly. this is a game with experienced players. the skill at which the scum is playing is evident in the fact that 2 of them are still alive, with all power roles dead. It wouldnt surprise me 1 bit if Glork/Thesp bussed their buddy.
forgive me if im wrong here, but being on the wagon when scum is lynched, DOES NOT CONFIRM YOU PROTOWN. If thats your mentality, you might as well go home now. :p
the fact is that MgM has not acted nearly as scummy throughout the game as Thesp. If 1 of those 2 is the Godfather, id choose Thesp every time, due to his play throughout the game.Patrick wrote:I think the point being made was the vast difference between your assessments of MgM and your assessment of Thesp, the two investigated players.Battle Mage wrote:oh and btw, can people stop referring to bits of my analysis which are wrong as 'slips'. ive already explained (and its evident to anyone reading it) that those were my thoughts at the time. My first thought was, "ah, MgM must have come up protown then". the gf bit became obvious later, and whilst it is true that MgM isnt 'confirmed' town, as i had said, there is little way in which that mistake could be construed as scummy.
what you say is true of typical games, but im sure you aware that there are exceptions to such rules. often, scum can go unnoticed for much of the game, and thus the fact that Thesp spotted CDB so early on is suspicious in itself. It seems quite possible that Glork noticed this bussing attempt, and joined in early, so that the rest of the town would share the same view as you: They cannot be scum.MrBuddyLee wrote:Yes, that's what I'm saying.BM wrote:so you consider it impossible that scum can lynch other scum?
What I'm actually asking is HOW DO PEOPLE EXAMINE A WAGON? Town looks at it to try and see whose suspicions were genuine and who manufactured something to tag along. Common sense tells town that the first two people on a successful scumwagon probably aren't both scum. I'll be very surprised if Thesp and Glork both turn out to be scum considering how that lynch played out, and therefore BM seeing them as a scumpair is indicative of a different kind of read of the lynch.
Scum reads a lynch for anything they can use to sow doubt. That appears to be what's happening here.
if i remember correctly, his analyses of the gameplay coincided alot with mine. he didnt do anything especially scummy either.Patrick wrote:Battle Mage:
Patrick wrote:Also, mind explaining why MBL looks like the "most protown looking player here"?
Because it's nigh impossible for me to see them as anything but scum trying to weasel out of being lynched (post 1564 stands out in particular).MrBuddyLee wrote:CES, CTD, any further comment on BM's posts? CES, why so defensive in your analysis? CTD, why'd you ignore BM's comments entirely?
DON'T PULL AN ETHER! NOT THIS TIME!CrashTextDummie wrote:Because it's nigh impossible for me to see them as anything but scum trying to weasel out of being lynched (post 1564 stands out in particular).MrBuddyLee wrote:CES, CTD, any further comment on BM's posts? CES, why so defensive in your analysis? CTD, why'd you ignore BM's comments entirely?
I agree that he is giving us valuable information, but I don't think it's worth analysing in detail until we know his alignment.
I'll drop the hammer sometimes later if no one else is willing to.