In post 1938, The Bulge wrote:Yes, my scum case against Team 9 is based on the fact that they are committing towntells
You said heads calling each other out was a towntell.
Then you backtracked on it because the calling out wasnt reciprocal, and then you said it was null
hence you went back to your previous reasoning of scumreading them
But you never said what said reasoning was.
Then you said that your reasoning for scumreading them was their heads distancing each other.
Then you get called out on your flip flop about it being a town tell or scum tell
Then you say you never called it a town tell
Then I quote you calling it a town tell.
Then you say that despite it saying literally "
It's a town tell because... X
you were explaining why it's a scumtell.
Then you say we're misrepping you.
Then I say you fail at english.
Then you say that you dont.
Then I say that i proved that you called it a town tell and that you instead of admitting it and pushing a different angle, you going over semantics was because you were self conscious of guilt.
Then you ask pie to quote their body of work.
Then pie makes their case on you with quotes on what you did and your contradictions.
Then you say you ignored it because he asked you for a single post of evidence.
Then we laugh.
Then you say their case is crap without ever addressing it.
Then we tell you to quote they distancing between their heads.
Then you say it never happened.
Then you say that when you started scumreading them is when they made a made up case on you.
If this is true, this happened before the argument about the towntell started, so im asking you to quote it.
So where exactly is the town motivation behind you pushing such a BS made up case to scum paint pieinnatirasha?