HackerHuck wrote:Why can't they both be scum?TonyMontana wrote:And Jordan, stop being pushed around by rampage, you are back at -1 again. I'd place the lynching vote myself right now, if I didnt think rampage was a much more likely scum...
It's been only six days since I replaced in. In case you didn't notice, two of those days had no posts from anyone in the game.JordanA24 wrote:Well, since we're deadlined, I'm going to go on a whim andSingle Vote: HH
He's replaced into the game, and disappeared after making a grand total of 5 posts, 1 of which had any real content in it. I'd also like him to elaborate on this:
HackerHuck wrote:Why can't they both be scum?TonyMontana wrote:And Jordan, stop being pushed around by rampage, you are back at -1 again. I'd place the lynching vote myself right now, if I didnt think rampage was a much more likely scum...
Even with the votes it just doesn't feel right, but I don't see what scum would gain from making it.johhan wrote:i'm nearly certain that either Albert, Jordan, or both, are scum.... I just don't want a lynch that kills what seems to be good discussion.
Don't see how you could read that. My statement was pretty straightforward; I think Jordan is scummy, but I think Albert is way more scummier, so I'm voting him.HackerHuck wrote:What does Rampage's scumminess have to do with Jordan's scumminess? His statement makes it seem like he thinks that Jordan would be cleared if Albert turned up scum. I just wanted to know if that's how he felt.
If you really think he's scum, it doesn't make sense not to lynch him. It seems like you want to show support for the wagon without showing up on it in the final vote count.TonyMontana wrote:Don't see how you could read that. My statement was pretty straightforward; I think Jordan is scummy, but I think Albert is way more scummier, so I'm voting him.HackerHuck wrote:What does Rampage's scumminess have to do with Jordan's scumminess? His statement makes it seem like he thinks that Jordan would be cleared if Albert turned up scum. I just wanted to know if that's how he felt.
We're waiting for a defence, bit hasty aren't we?TonyMontana wrote:Workin with a deadline people.. Tell me why we havent lynched albert b. scumpage yet...
I've already commented on all these attacks previously.Pinky wrote:I wrote this as I worked through the thread, that's why some of my comments go back a bit.
What's with Albert telling Jordan who to vote?
And then he agrees?
Another thing that bothers me about Albert is ac1983 fan says that TM is at -2, jordan votes and then he comes in to add another vote. Although he says he didn't believe he was casting the lynching vote that's what it read like to me. And I just realised TM just said practically that but oh well.
And when everyone else started questioning him he didn't answer at all well. Post 98 he says " I wanted to show him that putting someone at -1 is dangerous and anti-town, that's all....."
I don't get this comment, if he knows so well that it is anti-town why do it?
Then we get to posts 116/117. Albert tries to justify his vote with an argument he used before and Jordan is suddenly convinced.. what?
Out of everybody else no-one really stands out so at the moment I'm going tosingle vote: Albertand I willFOS: Jordanbecause at this moment in time putting him at -1 would be a very dangerous move.
It's possibel they are two scum buddies knowing that is one gets lynched the other can be all "look I didn't trust him so I must be innocent!" I don' think that the two of them both being town is a likely possibility so I'm pretty sure atleast 1 of them is scum.
If he's confident someone's scum, who are you to say where he should put his votes?HackerHuck wrote:Are we all playing the same game here?
I was referring to the fact that Tonywasn'tvoting for Jordan. He thinks Jordan is scum, but doesn't want to put him at lynch-1 because Albert seems scummier. That doesn't make sense, considering he's got two votes.
Why did Albert Claim? My count put him at 5 of the 8 votes needed to lynch.
I do like how Jordan is acting like Albert is the one in the hot seat...
That makes no sense. I want to lynch Albert. Im suspicious of Jordan, but I don't want to lynch him before Albert, so why the hell would I contribute to his bandwagon?HackerHuck wrote:Are we all playing the same game here?
I was referring to the fact that Tonywasn'tvoting for Jordan. He thinks Jordan is scum, but doesn't want to put him at lynch-1 because Albert seems scummier. That doesn't make sense, considering he's got two votes.