Mafia 64: The New "C9" - Game over!

[Albert B. Rampage]

Yes, true, but I disagree with the BM wagon, and obviously my own wagon.

I was looking for either a) a Johhan wagon or b) someone who is not TCS, as I'm getting a pro-town read from him.

This is a funny thing to say, but I get nervous when someone claims to get a pro-town read on me. So few people do, it's almost like they have knowledge of my alignment.

I know you find it suspicious. I know. I knew it when I said it.

Still that other thing you posted out of this thread makes me think your town.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

I'd hesitate to consider out of thread things indicative of my towniness. I'm in an awful lot of games right now, probably half of them involve the issue I brought up.

[YogurtBandit]

I'd hesitate to consider out of thread things indicative of my towniness. I'm in an awful lot of games right now, probably half of them involve the issue I brought up.

Just being curious, What was the issue you brought up?

[The Central Scrutinizer]

I'd hesitate to consider out of thread things indicative of my towniness. I'm in an awful lot of games right now, probably half of them involve the issue I brought up.

Just being curious, What was the issue you brought up?

Whether or not it would be a good metagame play to lynch Battle Mage Day 1 in every game regardless of his alignment or role.

[Glork]

Why a Johhan wagon?

Inactive, and OMGUS-ing.

So explain to me why you're not just voting him yourself?

I still don't understand why you feel the need to park your vote in the same places as other people. It makes no sense to me. Vote for whomever

YOU

find scummiest.

[Albert B. Rampage]

I did. But nobody else would, so I decided to apply pressure to someone else.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Albert, I know you're "on my side," but I'm not feeling comfortable with you at all at the moment.

Vote: Albert

This vote is probably temporary.

[Albert B. Rampage]

Never, ever, ever say a vote is temporary.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Never, ever, ever say a vote is temporary.

So I've heard. Meh.

[Glork]

Albert, I know you're "on my side," but I'm not feeling comfortable with you at all at the moment.

*raises eyebrow*

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Albert, I know you're "on my side," but I'm not feeling comfortable with you at all at the moment.

*raises eyebrow*

Thing is, people don't usually go out of their way to say I'm town. I'm a pretty consistent suspect in these games. For one, it's nice that someone believes me. However, that 'sucking up,' in a sense, combined with some of his other play, merits notice.

[YogurtBandit]

I did. But nobody else would, so I decided to apply pressure to someone else.

Did you hear what Glork Said? He said vote for whoever you think is scummiest.Dont worry about others. You could vote for the most Pro town acting player you've ever seen, and It wouldn't matter to others. You have an Opinon, a Voice.It didnt matter that no one lese would vote for the person you voted. It could be a nuisance, But if you really want pepole to vote The person you are after, Explain. and Not just " In activity and OMGUS-Ing", But real Proof. (Not that Inactivity and Omgusing are bad reasons, but there are better ones.)Unless of course, you're trying to get a Bandwagon Lynch on someone.

Vote: Albert

Btw, Can we get a Vote count please?

[Albert B. Rampage]

We are just at page 6, these are my initial impressions, that's all.

[YogurtBandit]

We are just at page 6, these are my initial impressions, that's all.

Your Inital Impressions are to join a Bandwagon??

[Glork]

...so because they're just "initial impressions," they aren't worth pursuing?

[Jack]

I'm not finding Glork very pro town. Don't agree with many of his posts.

I'm not in favor of a meta game lynch of BM. No behavior is 100% scummy so townies shouldn't be lynched for it, I don't find him that scummy anyway.

[Glork]

I'm not in favor of a meta-lynch of BM either. I'm in favor of getting him to adapt his playstyle so that he isn't practically

always

an immediate suspect

[The Central Scrutinizer]

We hashed this over in the thread I posted. I've come to the conclusion that I'm going to more or less ignore his behavior unless he 1) brings up a good point or 2) acts more unusually than usual.

[Jack]

I'm not in favor of a meta-lynch of BM either. I'm in favor of getting him to adapt his playstyle so that he isn't practically

always

an immediate suspect

Frankly I don't see why he

is

always an immediate suspect and such people are useful as scum-bait anyway. The town just has to be smart enough to not speed lynch them.

[Albert B. Rampage]

...so because they're just "initial impressions," they aren't worth pursuing?

Why ?

[Jack]

That's what he was asking you.

[Glork]

I'm not in favor of a meta-lynch of BM either. I'm in favor of getting him to adapt his playstyle so that he isn't practically

always

an immediate suspect

Frankly I don't see why he

is

always an immediate suspect and such people are useful as scum-bait anyway. The town just has to be smart enough to not speed lynch them.

...which, I will note, we didn't do. (Speed-lynch BM, that is.)

But no, I agree with TCS that it tends to be distracting much more often than helpful. Your suspicion of me, as far as I can tell, stems from our difference in philosophies regarding this matter. Stating that you disagree with my stance/points on a general metagame topic does not equate to thinking somebody is scum.

At any rate, if you think that BM became "scum-bait" this time around, which players jumping on him do you think were scums, and why?
-You stated YogurtBandit for not understanding what he was saying against BM
-You stated Beanbagboy for seeming wagon-happy
-You stated me because you disagree with me

Is there more? Would you mind elaborating on these suspicions? How do you distinguish Beanbagboy's behavior from Albert's behavior?


-------

...so because they're just "initial impressions," they aren't worth pursuing?

Why ?

...
I was asking you if this is how you feel. It's what you seemed to imply, to me. I interpreted your statement as such: "They're just initial impressions, so I didn't want to keep my vote on someone I thought was scummy; I'd rather bandwagon at this point."

Is this not what you meant? What did you mean?

[Albert B. Rampage]

I've pursued Johhan, but because the evidence was nowhere near overwhelming, I go looking for more information, that's all.

[Glork]

Heh. We seem to be having a fundamental breakdown in communication, Albert.

Why did you not pursue more information regarding

Johhan

and choose to go after somebody

who was being suspected by somebody else

?

[Guardian]

note, i do find Guardians departure from the hot wagon a bit scummy.

You find me getting off an easy target wagon and trying to look for people who I think might really be scum as scummy?

unvote vote: BM

I'd say that logic is BM acting more unusually than usual.

Um, I don't understand the Albert wagon at all, I don't think metaing BM every game is a good strategy, Glork may be scum (bad vibes)... How close is Albert to lynch now?? Anyways, not much to comment on imo as of yet.

Oh. YB is just new town imo, not new scum.