In post 6049, notscience wrote:Ah. Okay.
I need to reread today.
Iirc we only had like 1 death a night up until now
what changed
Shos' poison kill went through plus he used his 1-shot strongman kill.
In post 6049, notscience wrote:Ah. Okay.
I need to reread today.
Iirc we only had like 1 death a night up until now
what changed
how so?In post 6048, ProHawk wrote:In post 6033, shos wrote:eh, no; why would you do that? it just lets people know that there is a poisoner around. the role is a stealthy one, as in, if it is tracked or watched you can claim something else like doc etc...I don't see why one would do that. if Naraku's kills are through poisons, why let everyone know that fact?
I would say if beastcharizard were SK who poisons, it had a freaking good effect wouldn't you? His play is textbook third-party.
In post 6049, notscience wrote:Ah. Okay.
I need to reread today.
Iirc we only had like 1 death a night up until now
what changed
oh so now you ARE assuming that? just a moment ago you said you never said so! ah!In post 6050, Majiffy wrote:In post 6049, notscience wrote:Ah. Okay.
I need to reread today.
Iirc we only had like 1 death a night up until now
what changed
Shos' poison kill went through plus he used his 1-shot strongman kill.
In post 6054, shos wrote:
@Majiffy:
1. ok
2. you need to stop skimming the game. seriously. get your facts right.
3. how is that true.? there's one thing to suspect me scum, but to assume that I have two different methods of killing is negligible?
4. you need to explain the missing kill, you know.
5. you need to explain the triple-kill, you know.
6. *ignores*
basically what you're saying is that I am an SK who can both kill and poison and is ascetic and is a modified ninja who did NOT use any of his kills in the first night, and the explanation for the triple kill is not poison+kill+mafia kill and rather....SK kill+mafia kill+random death by mod?
In post 6058, shos wrote:oh so now you ARE assuming that? just a moment ago you said you never said so! ah!In post 6050, Majiffy wrote:In post 6049, notscience wrote:Ah. Okay.
I need to reread today.
Iirc we only had like 1 death a night up until now
what changed
Shos' poison kill went through plus he used his 1-shot strongman kill.
In post 6042, Majiffy wrote:
I also never specced your kills. Please quote me otherwise.
Please quote me assuming this.
Looks like a lot of grasping.
Majiffy wrote:In post 6049, notscience wrote:Ah. Okay.
I need to reread today.
Iirc we only had like 1 death a night up until now
what changed
Shos' poison kill went through plus he used his 1-shot strongman kill.
In post 6062, shos wrote:
I'm sorry, any inconsistency here?
5 is precisely 6050; and if you're not assuming 6, then the poison kill and the strongman kill would show in flips differently.?
In post 6059, Majiffy wrote:In post 6054, shos wrote:
@Majiffy:
1. ok
2. you need to stop skimming the game. seriously. get your facts right.
3. how is that true.? there's one thing to suspect me scum, but to assume that I have two different methods of killing is negligible?
4. you need to explain the missing kill, you know.
5. you need to explain the triple-kill, you know.
6. *ignores*
basically what you're saying is that I am an SK who can both kill and poison and is ascetic and is a modified ninja who did NOT use any of his kills in the first night, and the explanation for the triple kill is not poison+kill+mafia kill and rather....SK kill+mafia kill+random death by mod?
2. Please explain which of my facts are incorrect.
3. Poison SK standard kill. Your claimed 1-shot kills (that are apparently not as highly likely as you make them out to be, on D4 with only having received one!) is just that; additional. You can't just say "lol absurd 2 different killing methods" when one is barely passable.
4. Why? Why are we assuming there's a missing kill?
5. ... Mafia. ONE, HA-HA-HA. Poison. TWO, HA-HA-HA. Strongman. THREE, HA-HA-HA.
THREE! THREE KILLS TO GET TO THE CENTER OF A MUPPET TOOTSIE POP!
6. Cool story bro.
In post 6065, shos wrote:
2. one of them said that he has 100% been roleblocked, and the other said his action failed. go read, I don't need to do that for you.
In post 6065, shos wrote:
3. I'm sorry, so what you're saying is that you're also assuming that all that I have claimed IS TRUE? any more assumptions? (and learn to count: there have been 3 nights, I used the ability TWICE, remember? 1/2)
In post 6065, shos wrote:
4. BECAUSE THERE WAS ONLY 1 KILL ON N1 AND N2 ARE YOU READING THE ASME GAME???
In post 6065, shos wrote:
5. that is precisely what I am saying. you're assuming that I poisoned one N2 and killed the othe N3. I just don't get what you don't get.
In post 6065, shos wrote:
6. seriously, are you playing nuts or what? have you read the flips? they were all the same, right? so you're assuming poison & kill flips the same, yes?
In post 6067, Kagami wrote:Problem with shos ascetic SK, aside from all the attention he drew to himself day 1, is that it makes no sense to be both ascetic and a ninja.
In post 6054, shos wrote:@prohawk: that's interesting but it's weak and we have much bigger fish to fry now. keep it for tomorrow.
In post 6072, shos wrote:@Pro: can anyone explain to me what people see in katsuki's ISO that I don't? and what about abom/lemni associations, what can you learn from it? we know they're together >_>;
but anyway, we'll look into it tomorrow when we're smarter, even if you're dead.