InuYasha Mafia (Game Over)

beastcharizard · Post Post #5350 (ISO) » Sat Aug 16, 2014 5:11 pm

In post 5347, xofelf wrote:I won't flip scum. I will flip as the role I claimed. Because I haven't lied about a thing.

ATE

Also, this post means nothing.

Egg · Post Post #5351 (ISO) » Sat Aug 16, 2014 5:27 pm

In post 5349, xofelf wrote:Y and B: Their so called easily confirmable role hasn't been confirmed yet.
PA: I know she can post better than she has. Last time she did the prod dodge super busy dance she was scum. I don't normally meta, but her tone feels the same.

Otherwise most other people are fairly null. Not too many people are giving off vibes of hiding things or blatantly lying. Or their posts have them fluctuate back and forth with feeling townie and feeling scummy.

So on page 215 you have two reads?

Nero Cain · Post Post #5352 (ISO) » Sat Aug 16, 2014 6:49 pm

In post 5319, Serene2 wrote:you know, the fact that MOLLA HIMSELF is voting xof shows that her claim is a pretty direct counter-claim to his own]

the people hemming and hawing about how two JOATs can exist? Well, maybe, but highly freaking unlikely. Go back and look--- it's Molla that's sure her role can't exist in conjunction with xof's. Xof is more along the lines of "oh, two joats, ha ha thats weird lol lol lets talk about something else"

the fact that she's a MISH MASH player just makes it MORE likely that she fucked up by revealing what are pretty obviously scum-JOAT roles. as a non-mafia player, she might not have known any better.

in other words, rope that shit

shos · Post Post #5353 (ISO) » Sat Aug 16, 2014 9:31 pm

In post 5350, beastcharizard wrote:
In post 5347, xofelf wrote:I won't flip scum. I will flip as the role I claimed. Because I haven't lied about a thing.

ATE

Also, this post means nothing.

In post 5351, Egg wrote:
In post 5349, xofelf wrote:Y and B: Their so called easily confirmable role hasn't been confirmed yet.
PA: I know she can post better than she has. Last time she did the prod dodge super busy dance she was scum. I don't normally meta, but her tone feels the same.

Otherwise most other people are fairly null. Not too many people are giving off vibes of hiding things or blatantly lying. Or their posts have them fluctuate back and forth with feeling townie and feeling scummy.

So on page 215 you have two reads?

I seriously consider joining this wagon now. Both reads rely on meta-o-ptoddoge and a claim. Over 5000 posts that sucks ass in my opinion, and as a dying person id work more as final effort.

Abomination · Post Post #5354 (ISO) » Sat Aug 16, 2014 9:48 pm

In post 5349, xofelf wrote:Y and B: Their so called easily confirmable role hasn't been confirmed yet.

PA: I know she can post better than she has. Last time she did the prod dodge super busy dance she was scum. I don't normally meta, but her tone feels the same.

Otherwise most other people are fairly null. Not too many people are giving off vibes of hiding things or blatantly lying. Or their posts have them fluctuate back and forth with feeling townie and feeling scummy.

How the hell can you say that about a player who JUST replaced into the game and only has three posts? It's not like PA has been here since the beginning, so this is really poor.

Abomination · Post Post #5355 (ISO) » Sat Aug 16, 2014 9:49 pm

Vote: xofelf

Reads are SOOOO fake

Nero Cain · Post Post #5356 (ISO) » Sat Aug 16, 2014 10:04 pm

TBF, she's (PA) been in this game for a smidgen over a week so I'd argue that she didn't "just" replace in.

So I'm kinda like well "ok, lynch Elf, I agree that she's not really helping town that much and I don't want to hear you guys fussing about her every fucking day"

but then again posts like 5319 as so full of bullshit and it makes me really uncomfortable. That quick surge on p213 also gives me bad vibes.

I'd still much prefer an Abomination or Sroomish lynch but w/e.

shos · Post Post #5357 (ISO) » Sat Aug 16, 2014 10:48 pm

Yup. Staying on abom for the while.

Majiffy · Post Post #5358 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 12:16 am

In post 5342, shos wrote:
In post 5340, Majiffy wrote:
In post 5335, shos wrote:
Althoughbeing a CW to scum twice would kinda help my cause, Im not quite sure.

#scumposting

#DeathTunneling

#YouCanDeathTunnelScumToo

The Goat · Post Post #5359 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 12:16 am

L-2.

I think there's a question that needs to be asked of Xofelf before this gets finished.

NS, you agree?

The Goat · Post Post #5360 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 12:17 am

unvote

pending the result of that question.

shos · Post Post #5361 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 12:30 am

Which question.?

@majiffy:
#TrueButNaaaaaa

The Goat · Post Post #5362 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 12:41 am

Whether or not she has a shard.

I don't think she does, for reasons I'd like to keep to myself for now.

shos · Post Post #5363 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 1:29 am

Why the fuck would we want to ask that publicly?!?!

The Goat · Post Post #5364 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 1:53 am

In post 5363, shos wrote:Why the fuck would we want to ask that publicly?!?!

If we're lynching xof, why would we NOT? You want to just randomly finish the lynch, hope that Xof is lying, didn't have a shard, and gets hammered by someone who isn't scum?

shos · Post Post #5365 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 3:01 am

well, how will the answer to this question help you? all I can see is how it helps scum - they know if he had a shard, and if he did, they know who NOW has the shard. that is immensely stupid.

beastcharizard · Post Post #5366 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 3:38 am

What is this about shards? Gosh I should pay attention more often.

shos · Post Post #5367 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 3:57 am

some people have shards, and scum probably want to get them by killing them/hammering them

beastcharizard · Post Post #5368 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 4:15 am

Ok? Are these like the shards in the anime that everyone was trying to collect? If so scum probably already have at least 1.

shos · Post Post #5369 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 4:20 am

maybe or maybe not. either way, it is only beneficial to scum if we keep talking about it, so let's not. and I definitely do not want to ask xof if he has one.

beastcharizard · Post Post #5370 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 4:22 am

I wouldn't out if I had one anyway if I were town. So any towns answer should automatically be no they don't have one. Refusing to answer is like saying you have one.

shos · Post Post #5371 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 4:37 am

Unless you are trying to wifom scum, of course, like pretending you did not know about shards anyway!. Either way, discussion should stop. Vote abom.

beastcharizard · Post Post #5372 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 5:04 am

Why should I vote them?

Also, I don't even know my flavor name all I know is my power. That is how much I remember about this game.

Egg · Post Post #5373 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 5:30 am

How about xofelf doesn't answer that question but we pick who hammers anyway and if someone else hammers, we treat them as confirmed scum

The Goat · Post Post #5374 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 5:32 am

In post 5365, shos wrote:well, how will the answer to this question help you? all I can see is how it helps scum - they know if he had a shard, and if he did,
they know who NOW has the shard.
that is immensely stupid.

So...you're suggesting if someone is lynched and flips town, scum WOULDN'T target the person who hammered them, just in case they had a shard?

What I'm suggesting makes everyone accountable. There won't be any scum able to hide in "Oh, I didn't know she had a shard, and I hammered. Oops. I have a shard now."

Regarding the bolded, believe it or not, I've thought about this. if a town player has a shard, and they're about to be hammered, whats the better option? Relying on luck and hoping that whomever hammers is town, or getting someone widely viewed as town to do so, and hoping someone can protect said person?