Kingmaker II-Game Over


User avatar
Cavane
Cavane
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Cavane
Goon
Goon
Posts: 432
Joined: March 28, 2007

Post Post #2225 (ISO) » Thu May 24, 2007 12:14 pm

Post by Cavane »

Hello all. Obviously I've got some reading to do, so I'll see you all when that's done.
User avatar
Thesp
Thesp
Supersaint
User avatar
User avatar
Thesp
Supersaint
Supersaint
Posts: 5781
Joined: November 4, 2004
Location: Round Rock, TX

Post Post #2226 (ISO) » Thu May 24, 2007 12:34 pm

Post by Thesp »

Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:You're supposed to think about your LoE, Zindaras. You're undermining your own authority here, dude.
QFT.

I'm sorely disappointed in the list of execution,
especially
when there are two players who have more formal suspicion expressed against them than two people on the list. I'm especially disappointed not to see MoS not on the list for consideration.

I would support a spectrumvoid lynch. I oppose a VitaminR lynch, and am ambivalent about Fritzler (I think there are a number of better targets out there).

Vote: Zindaras
.
"When playing a game, the goal is to win, but it is the goal that is important, not the winning." -
Reiner Knizia

Ask me about my automatic votecounter, and how you can use it in
your
game!
Check out my 15 minutes of fame on Wait Wait...Don't Tell Me!
User avatar
RafK
RafK
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
RafK
Goon
Goon
Posts: 265
Joined: January 3, 2006

Post Post #2227 (ISO) » Thu May 24, 2007 12:49 pm

Post by RafK »

Mastermind of Sin wrote:ex-pablito...lol...can't you just call him Thesp?
Reminding myself (and others) of who he was before, for context. pablito had a lot of participation before he was replaced by Thesp.


Of Zindaras' LOE, I vote spectrumvoid obviously. For the reasons previously given by myself and more recently by PJ. To pre-empt SV shoiwng up and saying "but I answered those!", suffice to say that I wasn't incredibly impressed by the answers (I know that SV is now going to ask "Why?", but I've been home for about an hour so I think I'll wait a bit to get to that part).

Since Zindy put SV on the LOE but didn't comment much/at all on the case, I would be interested to know what Zindy's thoughts on the SV case are.
User avatar
Mastermind of Sin
Mastermind of Sin
Cassandra Complex
User avatar
User avatar
Mastermind of Sin
Cassandra Complex
Cassandra Complex
Posts: 15163
Joined: October 30, 2004
Location: Sleeping with the Godfather's Daughter

Post Post #2228 (ISO) » Thu May 24, 2007 12:58 pm

Post by Mastermind of Sin »

Thesp wrote:
Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:You're supposed to think about your LoE, Zindaras. You're undermining your own authority here, dude.
QFT.

I'm sorely disappointed in the list of execution,
especially
when there are two players who have more formal suspicion expressed against them than two people on the list. I'm especially disappointed not to see MoS not on the list for consideration.

I would support a spectrumvoid lynch. I oppose a VitaminR lynch, and am ambivalent about Fritzler (I think there are a number of better targets out there).

Vote: Zindaras
.
Which four people would you be referring to, Thesp?
Permanent V/LA.
User avatar
spectrumvoid
spectrumvoid
Problem Child
User avatar
User avatar
spectrumvoid
Problem Child
Problem Child
Posts: 3998
Joined: June 9, 2006

Post Post #2229 (ISO) » Thu May 24, 2007 1:07 pm

Post by spectrumvoid »

My take on the LOE:
I will be happy with a Fritzler lynch. This isn't because I think he's particularly scummy, but because I think SV is town (:)) and I think VitR is marginally more town than Fritz.
Blank.
User avatar
Thesp
Thesp
Supersaint
User avatar
User avatar
Thesp
Supersaint
Supersaint
Posts: 5781
Joined: November 4, 2004
Location: Round Rock, TX

Post Post #2230 (ISO) » Thu May 24, 2007 1:58 pm

Post by Thesp »

Masterminf of Sin wrote:Which four people would you be referring to, Thesp?
See the vote count - You and mnowax have 4 & 3 votes respectively, while Fritzler and VitaminR have 2 and 1 respectively. For a king who seems to be not participating very much in his own reign, I find it especially odd he glossed over some apparent will of the people without so much as a word.
"When playing a game, the goal is to win, but it is the goal that is important, not the winning." -
Reiner Knizia

Ask me about my automatic votecounter, and how you can use it in
your
game!
Check out my 15 minutes of fame on Wait Wait...Don't Tell Me!
User avatar
Mastermind of Sin
Mastermind of Sin
Cassandra Complex
User avatar
User avatar
Mastermind of Sin
Cassandra Complex
Cassandra Complex
Posts: 15163
Joined: October 30, 2004
Location: Sleeping with the Godfather's Daughter

Post Post #2231 (ISO) » Thu May 24, 2007 4:33 pm

Post by Mastermind of Sin »

So you consider votes to be the only form of "formal suspicion"?
Permanent V/LA.
User avatar
Thesp
Thesp
Supersaint
User avatar
User avatar
Thesp
Supersaint
Supersaint
Posts: 5781
Joined: November 4, 2004
Location: Round Rock, TX

Post Post #2232 (ISO) » Thu May 24, 2007 4:36 pm

Post by Thesp »

They're certainly the most obvious.
"When playing a game, the goal is to win, but it is the goal that is important, not the winning." -
Reiner Knizia

Ask me about my automatic votecounter, and how you can use it in
your
game!
Check out my 15 minutes of fame on Wait Wait...Don't Tell Me!
User avatar
VitaminR
VitaminR
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
VitaminR
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3668
Joined: November 14, 2005
Location: Somerville, MA

Post Post #2233 (ISO) » Thu May 24, 2007 6:14 pm

Post by VitaminR »

Mastermind of Sin wrote:VitaminR, what do you think of this analysis of Dead Rikimaru? This was made before he disappeared as king, so it has nothing to do with the lurking, etc. that PJ was talking about.

Dead Rikimaru:
Day 1 -
- Considers distancing tactic between pablito and Glork
- Claims that he didn't promote a pablito/Glork pairing, just that pablito is trying hard to be paired with pablito, can't think of a protown reason for it
I had this too.
Mastermind of Sin wrote: Day 2 -
- votes pablito, no additional reasoning
- No post from Oct 27 until Dec 12, nothing of substance or length until Dec 18
- Doesn't find Yos scummy (good post)
- Claims to be unable to read Pooky, prefers him over Yos
- Amused that the LoE only contains those who have criticized Glork
Nothing considerably scummy here, except for perhaps the fourth one. Claiming to be unable to read your scumbuddy is something I would expect from scum.
Mastermind of Sin wrote:Day 3 -
- Ask for top 3 suspects from each player
- Doesn't believe in randomly executing lurkers
- Calls for prods on lurkers
- Asks why Glork would bus a scumbuddy early in the game (My answer: Because he knows someone like you would ask yourself this question. Glork has admitted to being willing to bus any and all partners if he thinks it will get him a free pass through the game)
- States there are too many lurkers
- Asks me if my position on Phoebus is the same (I'll get to him eventually)
The lurker thing is somewhat scummy too, I'll grant you. He definitely seems overly concerned with them.

I think, on the whole, there are three clear scummy actions in your analysis that you could base a vote on, but I don't personally find them particularly convincing.

Thesp, to be fair, with the heat coming my way recently, I'm not sure if that 1 vote is still an accurate measure of general suspicion. I know TS and Yos definitely have me near the top of their lists, for one thing.
User avatar
spectrumvoid
spectrumvoid
Problem Child
User avatar
User avatar
spectrumvoid
Problem Child
Problem Child
Posts: 3998
Joined: June 9, 2006

Post Post #2234 (ISO) » Thu May 24, 2007 9:49 pm

Post by spectrumvoid »

VitaminR: If you've read what I've said about you, you'll notice that I think you're more pro-town than some.

Since votes are formal, I'll

vote: Fritzler and MoS


And you're right... why?
Blank.
User avatar
Zindaras
Zindaras
Mr(s) Popularity
User avatar
User avatar
Zindaras
Mr(s) Popularity
Mr(s) Popularity
Posts: 4343
Joined: April 13, 2006
Location: The Netherlands

Post Post #2235 (ISO) » Thu May 24, 2007 10:23 pm

Post by Zindaras »

Thesp wrote:See the vote count - You and mnowax have 4 & 3 votes respectively, while Fritzler and VitaminR have 2 and 1 respectively. For a king who seems to be not participating very much in his own reign, I find it especially odd he glossed over some apparent will of the people without so much as a word.
Vote: Fritzler, VitaminR


*gasp*

Now it's 4/3-3/2. I honestly don't see how 4 out of 16 means it's the "will of the people", or any more than Fritzler and Vitty are.
Show
Finished: 159 (120 Town, 33 Mafia, 5 Other, 1 Cult, 4 Cultivated)
68 Wins, 71 Losses
Town: 52 Wins, 54 Losses (2 Wins as Cult)
Mafia: 13 Wins, 15 Losses (1 Win as Cult)
Other: 3 Wins, 1 Loss (1 Win as Cult)
Cult: 0 Wins, 1 Loss
Cultivated: 4 Wins, 0 Losses
59 Survived, 31 Lynched, 60 Killed
User avatar
Mastermind of Sin
Mastermind of Sin
Cassandra Complex
User avatar
User avatar
Mastermind of Sin
Cassandra Complex
Cassandra Complex
Posts: 15163
Joined: October 30, 2004
Location: Sleeping with the Godfather's Daughter

Post Post #2236 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2007 7:14 am

Post by Mastermind of Sin »

Zindie: 1 || Thesp: 0
Permanent V/LA.
User avatar
Cavane
Cavane
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Cavane
Goon
Goon
Posts: 432
Joined: March 28, 2007

Post Post #2237 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2007 1:12 pm

Post by Cavane »

Well, that was quite a journey. Admittedly, I scanned over much of first half of the game. I didn't really think stuff that happened 3-4 months ago would be all that pertinant to what's going on now. I'll start compiling a list of things I have something to comment about from this Day. I have a feeling this post is going to be pretty long...
I've been attacked many times in the past, and to date, I've responded adequately to every reason brought against me. Had I not, I would not be living right now
It was already addressed and answered, but I have taken note of this and I didn't really care for MoS' response either.
X - Tries to have his cake and eat it too
What do you mean by that, Thok?
it looks like he must have had a good running knowledge of the game at the time he was making these posts, instead of simply relying on the latest posts to come to opinions (which I think scum are more likely to do).
I disagree with this. In my experience, town players are no more likely to pay close attention to a game than scum players. I consider attentiveness, or lack thereof, to be a non-tell, though admittedly the lack thereof is generally detrimental to the town.
Am I unqualified to think of you as scum if I've not read a game with you as scum? Am I privy to special and helpful information if I have?
Yes to the second question.
I hate it when people A) Ask players to check their other games and use meta knowledge. And B) Assert that doing so is a good strategy. Because it's not. Especially when it's induced by the player in question, as in this case. "Well, since I'm scum, I'll play my usual town playstyle this time and tell people to check my other threads." Also, despite that you didn't address the first question, MoS, you are implying that the opinions of those who haven't played with you are less valid than the opinions of those who have.
So, you're asserting that I haven't been clear in who I wanted executed, I haven't ever said something to the effect of "we should execute x", and I haven't ever proclaimed that I thought someone was protown? Votes are not the only way to indicate how you feel about someone. If you can prove that I've done none of the above (
all of which are just as tangible as a vote
or FoS), then maybe you have a case.
Not true. Your stated suspicions, however crystal clear they might be, still do not show up in a votecount, which is what most players use as a tool to see how the rest of the players are thinking. Expecting every player in this large game to keep track of who you are, were, might be suspicious of is unreasonable.
OMG PJ is a genius too. I am sorry but I must defer to brains that are so much more sophisticated and better irrigated than the bean-sized, oxygen-starved bit of grey matter tightly housed in my thick skull.
Is this not the same kind of 'buddying up' that cbox was condemned for D1? The first time you did it, I wrote it off as a joke, but to actually change your voting simply to follow other players, I think is irresponsible at the least.
I'll execute someone when I feel the game isn't advancing anymore.
Que for scum to start dragging down the discussion... Meanwhile, I'd also like to see a real LoE.
The problem is, there is always going to be at least one instance of where something scum would do has been done by a protown person. That doesn't change the fact that doing so is detrimental to the town and scummy in general.
QFT
89 pages, still 16 players.

EXECUTE SOMEONE ALREADY!!!!
There have been other posts like this, but this is the most recent. These posts kinda suck. They aren't scumtells, but they also don't help anyone except scum. It may be because I'm a newcomer and I'm reading all this back-to-back, but it doesn't seem to me like a whole lot has happened yet Today.
So you consider votes to be the only form of "formal suspicion"?
Yes. It's the very reason that terms like FoS, HoS, IGMEOY, etc. were coined. Votes are formal, anything else is informal, or just a statement.

I'm not prepared to cast any votes yet, as I'd like to get a bit more into this game first. Howver, as for the sort-of LoE, here's how I feel off the bat: SV would be fine, Fritzler I'd like to hear from before formin an opinion, VitR, although I've disagreed with some of his thinking (esp. the big fallacy post) seems townish to me. SV would be my choice right now.

PHEW
User avatar
petroleumjelly
petroleumjelly
he/him/his
Thirteenthly, ...
User avatar
User avatar
petroleumjelly
he/him/his
Thirteenthly, ...
Thirteenthly, ...
Posts: 6219
Joined: November 27, 2005
Pronoun: he/him/his
Location: Tacoma, WA

Post Post #2238 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2007 2:55 pm

Post by petroleumjelly »

Um. Who are you quoting in those quotes?
"Logic? I call that flapdoodle."
User avatar
mnowax
mnowax
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
mnowax
Goon
Goon
Posts: 740
Joined: September 16, 2006
Location: Middle of nowwhere, NY

Post Post #2239 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2007 3:19 pm

Post by mnowax »

So far LoE and my opinions (not that they will account for much)



SV- i dont think Voidy is a good lynch canidate ...yet...

VitR- I could go for his head. His tactics are a little shady when it comes to defense

Thr Fritz- Lycnh his ass need i say more?
Sure one more time for fun.
User avatar
Yosarian2
Yosarian2
(shrug)
User avatar
User avatar
Yosarian2
(shrug)
(shrug)
Posts: 16394
Joined: March 28, 2005
Location: New Jersey

Post Post #2240 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2007 3:22 pm

Post by Yosarian2 »

Um...yes, I think you do need to say more, mnowax. Like, some actual reasons or thoughts might be nice.
I want us to win just for Yos' inevitable rant alone. -CrashTextDummie
User avatar
ThAdmiral
ThAdmiral
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
ThAdmiral
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5920
Joined: September 20, 2006
Location: The Hills

Post Post #2241 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2007 6:11 pm

Post by ThAdmiral »

I haven't done a full read-through yet, but I seem to remember that zindies play didn't strike me as overly scummy, just...unusual. He has his own style, and thats fine with me.

My thoughts on the loe:

SV - I wouldn't.

Vit - I've been coming round to this one, but I think...

Fritz - is probably the best option today.
Don't ask me to provide self meta
User avatar
Mastermind of Sin
Mastermind of Sin
Cassandra Complex
User avatar
User avatar
Mastermind of Sin
Cassandra Complex
Cassandra Complex
Posts: 15163
Joined: October 30, 2004
Location: Sleeping with the Godfather's Daughter

Post Post #2242 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2007 9:27 pm

Post by Mastermind of Sin »

Cavane, the reason I didn't answer the first question is because I'm not sure what I think the answer is. I can't really defend myself any more than the answer I gave to that question and the comments I made that led to him asking the question, because if I say anything more, Thesp is just going to blame WIFOM on me, and you can't defend against that, so I'm not going to bother continuing that line of thought.
Permanent V/LA.
User avatar
RafK
RafK
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
RafK
Goon
Goon
Posts: 265
Joined: January 3, 2006

Post Post #2243 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2007 9:40 pm

Post by RafK »

I like Cavane's views and wish to subscribe to his newsletter. It's nice to replace an uncertain (the perpetually lurking DH/Vaughn) with a presence. My view of the "battle lines" here is finally taking shape.

Much as I'm not 100% certain of Fritzler either way, at this point my main problem with a Fritzler lynch is we need a lynch that resolves some arguments once and for all. We need someone executed that will make some people put up or shut up. Fritz is starting to feel like mnowax was yesterday: a late target about whom there's not been a lot of discussion on previous days. The only difference is that whereas mnowax was not one of Yos' own targets originally, but rather a late switch, Zindy raised Fritzler as an option pretty much from the start of this day (if not for that, you'd better believe I would be chalking Zindy up as a definite scum king right about now, instead of keeping an open mind on the subject).
User avatar
Cavane
Cavane
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Cavane
Goon
Goon
Posts: 432
Joined: March 28, 2007

Post Post #2244 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2007 10:22 pm

Post by Cavane »

Sorry about the lack of who was being quoted. My quote tags break whenever I include a name. In any case, I wasn't necessarily expecting responses from each of the people concerned. That was more for the benefit of the rest of the players, to know where I stand on recent events.

RafK: To begin recieving my newsletter, place $200 (A 20 year subscription) beneath the dumpster on Fourth and Main. You'll find your new issue in the same place bimonthly. Ask about our Gaurantee! Also, who do you think would be the most informative execution, not limiting yourself to the LoE?

mnowax and ThAdmiral: Listen to Yos.
User avatar
Mastermind of Sin
Mastermind of Sin
Cassandra Complex
User avatar
User avatar
Mastermind of Sin
Cassandra Complex
Cassandra Complex
Posts: 15163
Joined: October 30, 2004
Location: Sleeping with the Godfather's Daughter

Post Post #2245 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2007 10:48 pm

Post by Mastermind of Sin »

To be honest, SV is probably our best execution today. I agree that Fritzler is starting to look like yesterday's lynch, even though I think he could be scum. SV is another possible scum, and there's been enough debate on her that we'd gain a lot of info from her execution.
Permanent V/LA.
User avatar
VitaminR
VitaminR
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
VitaminR
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3668
Joined: November 14, 2005
Location: Somerville, MA

Post Post #2246 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2007 10:56 pm

Post by VitaminR »

mnowax wrote:VitR- I could go for his head. His tactics are a little shady when it comes to defense
I only defended myself yesterday. Today, no one has actually specified what they find suspicious about me. All that has happened is that I stated suspicions of PJ, part of which included disagreeing with his analysis of someone, and then people disagreed with my disagreeing.
User avatar
KaleiÐoscøpe
KaleiÐoscøpe
=====[]
User avatar
User avatar
KaleiÐoscøpe
=====[]
=====[]
Posts: 2821
Joined: June 11, 2006
Location: Straight from the Asylum

Post Post #2247 (ISO) » Sat May 26, 2007 1:04 am

Post by KaleiÐoscøpe »

Hammer Fritz or Mnowax, now.
User avatar
Thesp
Thesp
Supersaint
User avatar
User avatar
Thesp
Supersaint
Supersaint
Posts: 5781
Joined: November 4, 2004
Location: Round Rock, TX

Post Post #2248 (ISO) » Sat May 26, 2007 3:34 am

Post by Thesp »

Zindaras wrote:Vote: Fritzler, VitaminR

*gasp*

Now it's 4/3-3/2. I honestly don't see how 4 out of 16 means it's the "will of the people", or any more than Fritzler and Vitty are.
This helps. Thanks!

Why are you still side-stepping Mastermind of Sin? Why isn't he on there?

Also, lynching someone because it will give us information is a terrible reason to lynch someone.
"When playing a game, the goal is to win, but it is the goal that is important, not the winning." -
Reiner Knizia

Ask me about my automatic votecounter, and how you can use it in
your
game!
Check out my 15 minutes of fame on Wait Wait...Don't Tell Me!
User avatar
RafK
RafK
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
RafK
Goon
Goon
Posts: 265
Joined: January 3, 2006

Post Post #2249 (ISO) » Sat May 26, 2007 4:03 am

Post by RafK »

[quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]Hammer Fritz or Mnowax, now.[/quote]

Worried about something?

There's definitely sides coalescing on this one. The people desperate for the execution to be Fritz or mnowax (anything but SV!), and the other people. Some of the other people want SV dead, some are looking all around, but there's definitely a bloc fixated on avoiding the execution of anyone who's been the focus of argument. I believe the name of that bloc is "all or mostly scum".

To answer Cavane's question: Yos2, hands down. There is still a slight possibility that SV is a townie being used by the mafia as a stalking horse, someone they defend to gain credibility if a townie executes her. SV has not on the whole, since about day 2, been heavily involved in arguing for and against executions. Yos is no-one's stalking horse. Execution of Yos would establish which "side" is the scummy one. However, of the LOE, I would still execute SV. I think it would be very difficult (especially with the million or so replacements) for the scum to try and set a townie SV up like that.

Return to “Completed Large Theme Games”