InuYasha Mafia (Game Over)

The Goat · Post Post #4675 (ISO) » Fri Aug 08, 2014 12:42 am

In post 4623, notscience wrote:I get to pick who hammers me though.

How about me?

The Goat · Post Post #4676 (ISO) » Fri Aug 08, 2014 12:46 am

So...all else aside, we've got this...maybe...

Town:

Me
NS
Molla (?) (ns - why are you so convinced he's town?)
Shos

The Goat · Post Post #4677 (ISO) » Fri Aug 08, 2014 12:49 am

In post 4659, notscience wrote:K then, I guess I'm doing this.

ATTENTION

Some of us have shards. These shards are transferred based on lynching/who kills us.

It says we don't want scum to get all of them. So, if you have a shard and aren't someone who's already claimed it, DO NOT CLAIM IT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES.

From this point on, we need to have town evaluate potential hammerers so we don't end up giving them to scum that way.

Just...why? Why the fuck did you do this?

The Goat · Post Post #4678 (ISO) » Fri Aug 08, 2014 12:53 am

Goddammit.

The Goat · Post Post #4679 (ISO) » Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:01 am

NS...I'm pretty sure scum already knew their win con. What they DIDN'T know is that you had a shard. Now they know. They also know about Neil.

neil1113 · Post Post #4680 (ISO) » Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:03 am

I don't actually have shards, but from what I know, and from my role PM, I can support that they are in the game. And I knew NS was doing that, I'm not sure why ActionDan felt the need to state outright (including all the people who probably aren't reading this game, probably wouldn't have even noticed) that NS had one, it kinda blows my mind. I disagree like I said before that now was the time to come out and say that, I was trying to protect NS' shard for the time being. Unfortunately once it's outed, we can't do much...

neil1113 · Post Post #4681 (ISO) » Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:04 am

In post 4680, neil1113 wrote:I don't actually have shards, but from what I know, and from my role PM, I can support that they are in the game. And I knew NS was doing that, I'm not sure why ActionDan felt the need to state outright (including all the people who probably aren't reading this game, probably wouldn't have even noticed) that NS had one, it kinda blows my mind. I disagree like I said before that now was the time to come out and say that, I was trying to protect NS' shard for the time being. Unfortunately once it's outed, we can't do much...

My whole purpose was not to say I have a shard like NS, but that I knew where NS was coming from, and because of that we should NOT string him up. That simple.

The Goat · Post Post #4682 (ISO) » Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:06 am

In post 4681, neil1113 wrote:
In post 4680, neil1113 wrote:I don't actually have shards, but from what I know, and from my role PM, I can support that they are in the game. And I knew NS was doing that, I'm not sure why ActionDan felt the need to state outright (including all the people who probably aren't reading this game, probably wouldn't have even noticed) that NS had one, it kinda blows my mind. I disagree like I said before that now was the time to come out and say that, I was trying to protect NS' shard for the time being. Unfortunately once it's outed, we can't do much...

My whole purpose was not to say I have a shard like NS, but that I knew where NS was coming from, and because of that we should NOT string him up. That simple.

Not everyone who knows about the shards has shards. I think that's a pretty safe statement.

The Goat · Post Post #4683 (ISO) » Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:08 am

However...and I'm guessing here...I think that everyone who STARTED with shards is town.

Egg · Post Post #4684 (ISO) » Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:11 am

In post 4612, The Goat wrote:
In post 4538, shos wrote:Alright night's vig is going to be either of {notscience, Bulbafenix}

Hear me.

You are absolutely, positively, not vigging NS tonight.

If you do, I will slaughter you and throw your worthless carcass into the street.

Okay?

Bulb probably shouldn't be vidged either. But if you do decide on that, tell us before we lynch so he can claim.

Egg · Post Post #4685 (ISO) » Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:17 am

In post 4659, notscience wrote:K then, I guess I'm doing this.

ATTENTION

Some of us have shards. These shards are transferred based on lynching/who kills us.

It says we don't want scum to get all of them. So, if you have a shard and aren't someone who's already claimed it, DO NOT CLAIM IT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES.

From this point on, we need to have town evaluate potential hammerers so we don't end up giving them to scum that way.

Why was lynching you a good idea before you claimed this?

Actually, why was claiming this a good idea?

The Goat · Post Post #4686 (ISO) » Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:28 am

In post 4665, Nero Cain wrote:abomination is a great lynch to.

I can do this.

If you end up being scum, I'll be tragically upset. Well, not tragically. But a little upset.

The Goat · Post Post #4687 (ISO) » Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:29 am

vote Abomination

shos · Post Post #4688 (ISO) » Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:30 am

In post 4680, neil1113 wrote:I don't actually have shards, but from what I know, and from my role PM, I can support that they are in the game. And I knew NS was doing that, I'm not sure why ActionDan felt the need to state outright (including all the people who probably aren't reading this game, probably wouldn't have even noticed) that NS had one, it kinda blows my mind. I disagree like I said before that now was the time to come out and say that, I was trying to protect NS' shard for the time being. Unfortunately once it's outed, we can't do much...

we can have a doc target him, you know. it's very likely we have a doc/JK here.
But he said he has negative utilities; NS - is it worthy that you claim these? will it help town or scum more?

Also I don't want to vig you. it will be a reason for scum to kill me, and I wanna live

but also, I want to get rid of the useless ones in my scumlist, like bulba, abom or someone else from the list, haven't decided yet.

shos · Post Post #4689 (ISO) » Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:33 am

In post 4680, neil1113 wrote:I don't actually have shards, but from what I know, and from my role PM, I can support that they are in the game. And I knew NS was doing that, I'm not sure why ActionDan felt the need to state outright (including all the people who probably aren't reading this game, probably wouldn't have even noticed) that NS had one, it kinda blows my mind. I disagree like I said before that now was the time to come out and say that, I was trying to protect NS' shard for the time being. Unfortunately once it's outed, we can't do much...

Alright I'ma go with this lynch with good conscience.

VOTE: Abomination

Spoiler: here be abomination

Egg · Post Post #4690 (ISO) » Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:43 am

Shos, he already claimed the negative utilities. Puppet + shards. Although shards weren't really bad before he claimed. Just more reason to play for survival and avoid having to claim...

Moogle Dance Troupe · Post Post #4691 (ISO) » Fri Aug 08, 2014 2:35 am

While I

really

like the idea of giving BB a vig shot, the current situation is probably better. Scum are now incentivized to kill a negative utility role for us, rather than a power role.

Moogle Dance Troupe · Post Post #4692 (ISO) » Fri Aug 08, 2014 2:36 am

We can just lynch xof and get all the benefits of BB killing her, without having to lynch an obvtown.

Oversoul · Post Post #4693 (ISO) » Fri Aug 08, 2014 2:38 am

Shroomish has dropped off the face of the Earth.

ActionDan · Post Post #4694 (ISO) » Fri Aug 08, 2014 3:46 am

The one responsible for outing that NS held a shard is himself when he made it so a 4 year old with down syndrome could figure it out.

ActionDan · Post Post #4695 (ISO) » Fri Aug 08, 2014 3:50 am

Let's lynch pretty clear scum xofelf. I would lynch oversoul or shroomish too however. There's no reason to leave xofelf for later. She wont be killed nor will she actually do anything of use to town. I dare her to list her other abilities

ActionDan · Post Post #4696 (ISO) » Fri Aug 08, 2014 3:51 am

Along with their flavor names.

Squirrel Girl · Post Post #4697 (ISO) » Fri Aug 08, 2014 6:15 am

In post 4648, Nero Cain wrote:NICE CHERRY PICK! My "this is pretty yuck" was ob in response to BOP's 4430 but nice try trying to make it look like I was calling Neil scum over the cray cray case.

Well.
1. I can handle a 1 minute response, and have multiple 1 minute responses in this thread alone much less my other games.
2. You are ignoring how my post doesn't make sense in response to the one post (and calling me scummy for it) and ignoring that my comment *does* make sense in response to the one you're claiming I couldn't have responded to. Good deductive work.

3. I'm not even sure what my scum benefit of setting you up for this would be, even if it was my goal. Like, say I did it...I then move the case from a theoretical fakeclaim (that has never happened) to a reality of why you two are both pushing a derp case...making me able to dismiss the case for what has happened as opposed to...dismissing the case because it is based on an idea that didn't happen? Whoo-hoo!

Majiffy is becoming scummier and scummier for me. He is basically doing nothing and has been doing nothing for, like, this entire day phase. But he's still posting a lot.
I'm okay with the Abom wagon.
I still don't support shooting Bulba.

beastcharizard · Post Post #4698 (ISO) » Fri Aug 08, 2014 6:16 am

I need to declare vla when I am out of town. I haven't been prodded yet. I get back to my house Sunday and I will officially catch up then. I am pretty current though since I generally read and don't post while on my phone.

Nero Cain · Post Post #4699 (ISO) » Fri Aug 08, 2014 6:40 am

ok!

You are claiming that

In post 4439, Squirrel Girl wrote:It doesn't though. Just like his case on you is silly, the reverse of 'only scum would push this silly case' is equally silly.

is a response to

In post 4438, Nero Cain wrote:
This pretty yuck though. Its p obvious what Neil is getting at. I softclaim vig, no shot hence in his black and white mind I am "lying".

I'm talking about why Neil thinks that I'm lying. I don't think that "It doesn't though." Really makes any kind of sense in reply to this.

In post 4437, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 4432, shos wrote:neil, please explain..? if you got a guilty, claiming would be beneficial right now imo.

I agree! 'cause then you guys would lynch me but
I'm going to flip town which confirms Neil as scum
.

"It doesn't though" DOES make sense in reply to the bolded.

Town has no reason to lie, on this I agree with Neil. I'm pretty sure you are scum so I'm going to quit arguing with you. I kinda dislike how Shos doesn't want you dead 'cause you are a confirmed dv and I don't know if he's your buddy, other scum or just stupid.