In post 482, Unsight wrote: In post 471, Atum wrote:The conf bias is strong in this one, I can almost taste it.
I asked you to tunnel me Unsight, what happened?
I did. I'm sure what you're fishing for here.
In post 475, Atum wrote:And since when do you suspect Rubicon is scum, Unsight c'mon.
My ISO should tell you.
In post 474, Atum wrote:Actually even more questions, what's wrong with post 50?
Go read Post 50. If you can't see what's wrong with it, this becomes a different conversation.
In my Post 408, I thought ABR started the wagon and font jumped on it.
Unsight are you going to be difficult? That would make me sad. Take a look at all the times you've directly mentioned Rubicon in ISO, including quotes:
In post 194, Unsight wrote:So far I'm really not liking fontisian.
The entire pregame was basically him rolefishing and attempting to buddy with
Rubicon
,
Atum,
Ika, and maybe Heel. fontisian flips scum and it's likely one of those is his first scum buddy and someone he more or less avoided is his other scum buddy.
More to come once I digest the posts made since last I read. In the meantime, I like this a lot:
VOTE: fontisian
In post 405, Unsight wrote:
In post 349, Unsight wrote:
Basically more of the same.
Post 240 is says all the active people are town and the
Post 241,
, says the inactive people are scum. That's not scum hunting, that's covering your butt.
In post 377, fontisian wrote:3. The picking at a minor wording arrangement was a way of discrediting my attack without directly engaging me. Simply put, it was a cop out.
Kettle meet pot.
In post 468, Unsight wrote: In post 465, hiplop wrote:I could go for switching to ABR. My biggest bad habit is tunnel vision. ABR has done literally nothing as far as i can tell. Jumped on an easy wagon withme (that had no explanation, either from him or others)
Ditto--minus the bit about ABR having done nothing. I really want to policy lynch ABR because I can't decide whether his play is annoying or annoyingly scummy.
I got the order of operations wrong on the
Rubicon
wagon wrong, but with the way font is going for the "Town Leader" angle as someone else put it I could totally see a Day 1 Font/ABR bus on Ribicon for early credibility. I was actually digging a
Rubicon
wagon and have been since Post 50 which was just plain weird but then ABR/font did their thing and that gave me all sorts of creepy crawly feelings so I've kept my vote on font.
The only thing about a fontisian - ABR -
Rubicon
scum team is that means Atum is not scum which just confuses me. I've had a light scum read on Atum, but every time I try to connect the dots they're just not there. It's worth ISO'ing him if you haven't ( you referring to everyone ), but I stand by the money lynch being fontisian both in terms of killing scum and getting information. ABR can be tomorrow.
Now if you're going to be tossing me bullshit, dismissive answers like this, you can have my vote for toDay.
All I'm fishing for is you getting lynched at this point.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Unsight
In post 50, Rubicon wrote:Gravedigger is usually a low priority night kill for the scum.
Let's have that other conversation. What exactly is wrong with this?
Next we're going to find where you tunnel me, here's every post in which you even appear to be questioning/attacking me:
In post 194, Unsight wrote:So far I'm really not liking fontisian.
The entire pregame was basically him rolefishing and attempting to buddy with
Rubicon,
Atum,
Ika, and maybe Heel. fontisian flips scum and it's likely one of those is his first scum buddy and someone he more or less avoided is his other scum buddy.
More to come once I digest the posts made since last I read. In the meantime, I like this a lot:
VOTE: fontisian
In post 242, Unsight wrote:
You said your reason for voting fontisian was different from mine in
Post 196. What is it?
Also, what about MadCitrus makes him scummy? Did you just want to make him orange?
In post 283, Unsight wrote: In post 282, ika wrote:what are your reads as well, i need soemthign to do here im getting board myself
No kidding. Half the players are never here due to V/LA or just lurkage. You can only read the same posts before you start thinking "Is that scummy? Or how about that? Maybe that's a scum tell."
Atum's
whole "If you could have picked a role, what would it be?" is really scummy if you look at it in the light of "Tell me what role you're not" because then it becomes a more clever bit of rolefishing. But then I doubt myself by thinking "Is that really scummy or am I just that bored I'm seeing scum tells where there aren't any?" I don't want to tunnel on the people posting just because they're the only ones talking.
In post 468, Unsight wrote: In post 465, hiplop wrote:I could go for switching to ABR. My biggest bad habit is tunnel vision. ABR has done literally nothing as far as i can tell. Jumped on an easy wagon withme (that had no explanation, either from him or others)
Ditto--minus the bit about ABR having done nothing. I really want to policy lynch ABR because I can't decide whether his play is annoying or annoyingly scummy.
I got the order of operations wrong on the Rubicon wagon wrong, but with the way font is going for the "Town Leader" angle as someone else put it I could totally see a Day 1 Font/ABR bus on Ribicon for early credibility. I was actually digging a Rubicon wagon and have been since Post 50 which was just plain weird but then ABR/font did their thing and that gave me all sorts of creepy crawly feelings so I've kept my vote on font.
The only thing about a fontisian - ABR - Rubicon scum team is that means
Atum
is not scum which just confuses me. I've had a light scum read on
Atum
, but every time I try to connect the dots they're just not there. It's worth ISO'ing him if you haven't ( you referring to everyone ), but I stand by the money lynch being fontisian both in terms of killing scum and getting information. ABR can be tomorrow.
This is not tunneling.
Also this was super fun to write. For clarity and repetitiveness:
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Unsight
@Anyone: Is it possible to take an entire page for one post?