Mini 1595: WiFom City: The Inquisition - GAME OVER - THANKS!

MadCitrus · Post Post #325 (ISO) » Mon Jul 28, 2014 6:49 pm

In post 324, ika wrote:
In post 323, MadCitrus wrote:Ika, that's a fake vote

no, if a host can distiguish the vote it should count. if its not right i can correct it later. im lazy

Working off sc2mafia standards when I said that but ok

ika · Post Post #326 (ISO) » Mon Jul 28, 2014 6:50 pm

In post 325, MadCitrus wrote:
In post 324, ika wrote:
In post 323, MadCitrus wrote:Ika, that's a fake vote

no, if a host can distiguish the vote it should count. if its not right i can correct it later. im lazy

Working off sc2mafia standards when I said that but ok

you have a lot to learn cirtus about the diffrences between here and sc2

fontisian · Post Post #327 (ISO) » Mon Jul 28, 2014 6:51 pm

Did I say the imitation was intentional? No? That's because it's not. You'll notice Rubicon immediately nitpicked, because he's scum.

I'm not going to speculate on Rubicon's role here, even though some of it should be obvious. Deal with it.

Rubicon · Post Post #328 (ISO) » Mon Jul 28, 2014 6:58 pm

In post 315, ika wrote:
In post 314, Rubicon wrote:Where is the hyperaggressive attack-dog death tunneling of scum?

So im not the only one who noticed it either...

rubi when your not as tired can you do a full on read list and reaons?

Are you saying I'm scum or town imitating my scum play?

Rubicon · Post Post #329 (ISO) » Mon Jul 28, 2014 6:59 pm

Dunno why that quoted ika.

fontisian · Post Post #330 (ISO) » Mon Jul 28, 2014 7:13 pm

I'm saying your play is your scum play.

Titus · Post Post #331 (ISO) » Mon Jul 28, 2014 7:19 pm

In post 322, ika wrote:know what i noticed, how font would try to lead kash to lead angles, why dont we just have font do it for us

VOTE: font

This vote, along with any abbrevations/nicknames, do count if the intent is unambiguous. By using a nickname, you just chance my interpretation.

~Titus

Add vc

Rubicon · Post Post #332 (ISO) » Mon Jul 28, 2014 7:29 pm

Okay.

If I'm town, who is your next suspect?

fontisian · Post Post #333 (ISO) » Mon Jul 28, 2014 7:33 pm

Atum or Unsight.

ika · Post Post #334 (ISO) » Mon Jul 28, 2014 7:37 pm

In post 333, fontisian wrote:Atum or Unsight.

why atum?

and you think its scum!GD?

fontisian · Post Post #335 (ISO) » Mon Jul 28, 2014 7:45 pm

Think about it. It's not exactly difficult to figure out.

ika · Post Post #336 (ISO) » Mon Jul 28, 2014 7:50 pm

In post 335, fontisian wrote:Think about it. It's not exactly difficult to figure out.

you tell me, you need to do the convincing. right now your very unconvincing

ZZZX · Post Post #337 (ISO) » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:53 am

@Mod VLA 2 days. I thought I said that here but it seems I didnt.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #338 (ISO) » Tue Jul 29, 2014 3:50 am

Yeah ok let's lynch Rubicon.

MadCitrus · Post Post #339 (ISO) » Tue Jul 29, 2014 5:19 am

In post 338, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Yeah ok let's lynch Rubicon.

Are you actually going to contribute something useful?

Has anyone played with ABR before? Would he try to coast as scum?

ika · Post Post #340 (ISO) » Tue Jul 29, 2014 6:18 am

In post 339, MadCitrus wrote:
In post 338, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Yeah ok let's lynch Rubicon.

Are you actually going to contribute something useful?

Has anyone played with ABR before? Would he try to coast as scum?

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=51&t=38354

Rubicon · Post Post #341 (ISO) » Tue Jul 29, 2014 6:20 am

he plays like this as both alignments.

decided to leave fontisian alone for now.

VOTE: Jargonaut

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #342 (ISO) » Tue Jul 29, 2014 6:23 am

In post 339, MadCitrus wrote:Are you actually going to contribute something useful?

I do, most of the time.

Atum · Post Post #343 (ISO) » Tue Jul 29, 2014 6:45 am

In post 275, Honey bee wrote:

Atum, is your unsight scum read because of them not posting alot pregame?

No. My issue with the pre-game thing is that she waited until D1 and then the reason for the reveal was unconvincing. Unless there were people besides ika the that figured out her role before the reveal. Plus, fontisian has a slight proclivity towards bussing scummates, at least on IRC and I'd like to watch those interactions develop. The same thing goes for her and Citrus. If my reads were based on activity, well there aren't enough scum in game for that.

In post 283, Unsight wrote:
In post 282, ika wrote:what are your reads as well, i need soemthign to do here im getting board myself

No kidding. Half the players are never here due to V/LA or just lurkage. You can only read the same posts before you start thinking "Is that scummy? Or how about that? Maybe that's a scum tell."

Atum's whole "If you could have picked a role, what would it be?" is really scummy if you look at it in the light of "Tell me what role you're not" because then it becomes a more clever bit of rolefishing. But then I doubt myself by thinking "Is that really scummy or am I just that bored I'm seeing scum tells where there aren't any?" I don't want to tunnel on the people posting just because they're the only ones talking.

Firstly, I think you think I'm more clever than I think I am. Secondly, please for the love of god tunnel me. This is sooooo booooring.

Also, fontisian has posted some more since you voted her, thoughts?

Rubicon · Post Post #344 (ISO) » Tue Jul 29, 2014 6:54 am

In post 335, fontisian wrote:Think about it. It's not exactly difficult to figure out.

oh I realized what this means.

ZZZX · Post Post #345 (ISO) » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:16 am

From a quick skim on my phone and I just arrive at my PC I must say this feels like town rubi. Scum rubi is very passive.

Or so my limited experiance with him showed

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #346 (ISO) » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:25 am

In post 345, ZZZX wrote:From a quick skim on my phone and I just arrive at my PC I must say this feels like town rubi. Scum rubi is very passive.

Or so my limited experiance with him showed

This isn't a good indicator for alignment,

Grib · Post Post #347 (ISO) » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:33 am

It's better than nothing.

VOTE: Albert B. Rampage

ZZZX · Post Post #348 (ISO) » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:07 pm

In post 346, Albert B. Rampage wrote:
In post 345, ZZZX wrote:From a quick skim on my phone and I just arrive at my PC I must say this feels like town rubi. Scum rubi is very passive.

Or so my limited experiance with him showed

This isn't a good indicator for alignment,

passive <> inactive as I think you thought.

Passive = not attacking. Does not try to actively scum hunt.

I will need to meta him deeply as my experiance with him contained me as a jester so it really wasnt that deep.

Unsight · Post Post #349 (ISO) » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:52 pm

In post 343, Atum wrote:Also, fontisian has posted some more since you voted her, thoughts?

Basically more of the same. Post 240 is says all the active people are town and the Post 241, mostly, says the inactive people are scum. That's not scum hunting, that's covering your butt. And that's how most all her posts read--no scum hunting, using previous game meta to gain ground, and just befriending as many people as possible to avoid a lynch. I also like how she qualified a statement in Post 162 with "if I['m] town" too.