Mini 442 - Beast Wars Mafia Game Over

JordanA24 · Post Post #125 (ISO) » Mon May 21, 2007 4:01 am

Lowell wrote:@Jordan- Okay, okay, we get it. You're upset that we're trying to lynch your scumbuddy. Sheesh.

Seriously, you're trying to present a "most likely" scenario that doesn't include ryan, just cuz you *wubs* him too much? Does that, like, EVER work?

Ryan today, Jordan tomorrow, celebratory wine and cheese for all after.

How about Lowell today, hopefully your scumbuddy tomorrow, sounds about right to me.

Trying not to mimic Ryan, your post is pathetic and trying to distract everyone else from your scumminess with a last ditch attempt to wildly pinpoint the blame elsewhere. I'm also feeling very happy with my vote, it certainly isn't going anywhere else today.

Lowell · Post Post #126 (ISO) » Mon May 21, 2007 6:39 am

ryan wrote:^^^ Lowell that was as useless of a post as you've posted in awhile now. I definetly feel much better about my vote now, you are definetly scum and you show it by not helping us find the scum. Seriously what does that post tell us? That you're mad because Jordan stood up to you? You are mad that I voted you? Or you feel as though you are going to be killed and it's a last dash effort to save your own backside by throwing out my name and Jordan's and saying we are scum together?

1. I'm not going to be lynched. If you want me dead you'll have to do it yourself tonight.
2. A "last ditch" effort, at 3 votes??? Good times.
3. My vote on you was for the way you attacked early bandwaggoners before the bandwaggon even took off. I believe you said something stupid like someone was a "potential townie".

All that said, I'm no longer sure you're scum, if for no other reason than because this connection between you and Jordan is becoming too intense-- I would have expected a little distancing by now if you were both scum. Let me find another wagon to join.

unvote, vote teffc

. I have no idea what the case is against him, but other people seem to like it, so I'm there!

Lowell · Post Post #127 (ISO) » Mon May 21, 2007 6:41 am

Wait, do I still have someone's random vote on me? Screw this:

unvote, vote OTU

. I can OMGUS with the best of them.

JordanA24 · Post Post #128 (ISO) » Mon May 21, 2007 6:49 am

Lowell, WTF?! You are the worst scum I've come across in a long time, first, you go with the rest of the town, which is typical scum behaviour, even though you admit you have no idea what the case against her is. And then to compound your error, you OMGUS a random vote when the random/OMGUS voting stage has passed more than a week ago.

Fellow townies, we've caught scum.

Lowell · Post Post #129 (ISO) » Mon May 21, 2007 7:39 am

Nope.

JordanA24 · Post Post #130 (ISO) » Mon May 21, 2007 7:46 am

A decent defence would be nice.

Primoris · Post Post #131 (ISO) » Mon May 21, 2007 8:03 am

Alright, I'm back.

I see that that 5th vote I casted has stirred up some discussion and all I can say is that I stand by my decision. I did not just want to see your reaction ryan, but everyone elses too.

I've got to read up a bit better before coming with something truly substantial, especially Aimee's long posts look interesting

but I've got to agree that Lowell's most recent post looks odd. That change of play came out of the blue for me.

ryan · Post Post #132 (ISO) » Mon May 21, 2007 8:57 am

Primoris wrote:Alright, I'm back.

I see that that 5th vote I casted has stirred up some discussion and all I can say is that I stand by my decision.
I did not just want to see your reaction ryan, but everyone elses too.

I've got to read up a bit better before coming with something truly substantial, especially Aimee's long posts look interesting but I've got to agree that Lowell's most recent post looks odd. That change of play came out of the blue for me.

WELL that was what 50 posts ago?

If you were trying to get a rise outta people or to see what they'd do after you voted you have ALOT of stuff to re-read. Lurk much?

Primoris · Post Post #133 (ISO) » Mon May 21, 2007 9:03 am

Primoris wrote:Forgot to say, I'll be away Friday through Sunday.

That was a short post, number 77

chaotic_diablo · Post Post #134 (ISO) » Mon May 21, 2007 1:24 pm

Vote Count 5 for Day One

Lowell (3) : OvertheUnder, ryan, JordanA24
ryan (3) : deezr, HackerHuck, Primoris
teffc (3) : TrustGossip, Albert B. Rampage, Aimee

OverTheUnder (1) : Lowell

Not Voting (2) : Ripley, Teffc

Remember, it's 7 to lynch.

Aimee · Post Post #135 (ISO) » Mon May 21, 2007 9:58 pm

*Cough*... I'm voting Teffc, but I am also put down as not voting...

ryan · Post Post #136 (ISO) » Tue May 22, 2007 2:52 am

So we're down to Teffc and Ripley as "needing to vote"

HackerHuck · Post Post #137 (ISO) » Tue May 22, 2007 3:49 am

ryan wrote:So we're down to Teffc and Ripley as "needing to vote"

Why are you so eager for them to vote? Your behaviour has turned rather aggressive.

JordanA24 · Post Post #138 (ISO) » Tue May 22, 2007 3:54 am

Ripley asked for replacement didn't he? Shame, he's a good player.

ryan · Post Post #139 (ISO) » Tue May 22, 2007 6:26 am

HackerHuck wrote:
ryan wrote:So we're down to Teffc and Ripley as "needing to vote"
Why are you so eager for them to vote? Your behaviour has turned rather aggressive.

Calm down HackerHuck, I was asking a question on who was left to vote. Why should I be in a hurry, I'm on the block right now, I'd like everyone to participate, no harm in that is there?

chaotic_diablo · Post Post #140 (ISO) » Tue May 22, 2007 2:06 pm

teffc had asked for a replacement.

Sweenytodd replaces Ripley.

Sweenytodd · Post Post #141 (ISO) » Tue May 22, 2007 6:52 pm

Hi guys, I am replacing in. I'm going to re-read and post my thoughts tomorrow, just checking in atm, letting you know that I am here = ).

ryan · Post Post #142 (ISO) » Wed May 23, 2007 1:46 am

Welcome to the game Sweenytodd

TrustGossip · Post Post #143 (ISO) » Wed May 23, 2007 2:07 am

ryan wrote:Welcome to the game Sweenytodd

Edit: Welcome to the tragic debacle Sweenytodd

[some light humor, celebrating the fact that I drove across two states to live at a friend's house in order to have a functioning computer for Mafia]

TrustGossip · Post Post #144 (ISO) » Wed May 23, 2007 2:08 am

Oh wow, I just noticed on the front page. teffc is being replaced? I can't see anything positive coming from this...

ryan · Post Post #145 (ISO) » Wed May 23, 2007 2:10 am

TrustGossip wrote:Oh wow, I just noticed on the front page. teffc is being replaced? I can't see anything positive coming from this...

Two of our quietest players are now gone, agreed, this could be bad for us townies

Lowell · Post Post #146 (ISO) » Wed May 23, 2007 2:11 am

TrustGossip wrote:Oh wow, I just noticed on the front page. teffc is being replaced? I can't see anything positive coming from this...

What the hell does this comment mean?

ryan · Post Post #147 (ISO) » Wed May 23, 2007 2:19 am

Lowell wrote:
TrustGossip wrote:Oh wow, I just noticed on the front page. teffc is being replaced? I can't see anything positive coming from this...
What the hell does this comment mean?

Well the way I read it is the same thing I'm wondering. Two new people in a game where we already are having problems making decisions, hopefully they bring in some good new information and thoughts

Lowell · Post Post #148 (ISO) » Wed May 23, 2007 4:56 am

New people are always good. All the better to read scumtells from...

Lowell · Post Post #149 (ISO) » Wed May 23, 2007 4:58 am

I'm going back to

unvote, vote ryan

. Your last few posts have been a bit off, in my opinion. Something about the way you wrote "us townies" and argued that quiet players are actually HELPFUL doesn't sit right.