Micro 366: Vengeball (Game Over)

Drew-Sta · Post Post #250 (ISO) » Wed Jul 23, 2014 10:18 am

VOTE: ZZZX

Bert · Post Post #251 (ISO) » Wed Jul 23, 2014 10:22 am

phokdapolees · Post Post #252 (ISO) » Wed Jul 23, 2014 10:34 am

Vote Count 3.01ZZZX (1): Drew-Sta

Not voting: Bert, Honey bee, ZZZX, BBmolla

With 5 alive, it takes 3 to lynch

Deadline in (expired on 2014-08-06 17:00:00)

Drew-Sta · Post Post #253 (ISO) » Wed Jul 23, 2014 11:20 am

In post 251, Bert wrote:Why?

Reasons as 237. He, Boon and Nespresso I felt strongly about. Going for 2/3 on them.

Drew-Sta · Post Post #254 (ISO) » Wed Jul 23, 2014 11:22 am

To add, you and Molla are coin tosses in my mind. We don't have the fortune to go with a coin toss right now.

ZZZX · Post Post #255 (ISO) » Wed Jul 23, 2014 12:05 pm

You are aware that by voting me you run into a deep risk. If either you or me were not blue scum then I would have been instantly hammered.

Looking deeper I found your play interesting. And since I am not seeing any quick hammers Its 75% sure that you are blue scum. I have another reason for believing so.

ZZZX · Post Post #256 (ISO) » Wed Jul 23, 2014 12:09 pm

I will make sure that blue scum isnt really off before giving my vote just to make sure we dont lose this. Anyway I think I answered the post you talked about didnt I?

Meanwhile I will believe in the existance of VI-ancy because one clouded judgement will be bad. Right now I have a slight idea who blue scum is.

Bert · Post Post #257 (ISO) » Wed Jul 23, 2014 12:14 pm

In post 255, ZZZX wrote:If either you or me were not blue scum then I would have been instantly hammered.

We don't know who has showed up yet. A set-up quickhammer via daytalk isn't even optimal at this point for blue - the quickhammerer likely gets vengekilled.

ZZZX · Post Post #258 (ISO) » Wed Jul 23, 2014 12:24 pm

In post 257, Bert wrote:
In post 255, ZZZX wrote:If either you or me were not blue scum then I would have been instantly hammered.

We don't know who has showed up yet. A set-up quickhammer via daytalk isn't even optimal at this point for blue - the quickhammerer likely gets vengekilled.

No venge kills at lylo.

Bert · Post Post #259 (ISO) » Wed Jul 23, 2014 12:25 pm

Ouch.

Drew-Sta · Post Post #260 (ISO) » Wed Jul 23, 2014 12:38 pm

In post 255, ZZZX wrote:You are aware that by voting me you run into a deep risk. If either you or me were not blue scum then I would have been instantly hammered.

Exactly. You've proven my point. The fact noone has voted for you yet indicates to me that you're likely scum. Town isn't going to quick hammer - red scum are. That noone has jumped on you (which is one of the reasons I voted you - to see who moved quickly) identifies that. At the moment we need to find red scum, and I think I've identified you as one.

In post 255, ZZZX wrote:Looking deeper I found your play interesting. And since I am not seeing any quick hammers Its 75% sure that you are blue scum. I have another reason for believing so.

Go on, I'm willing to listen. Make your case or stop flinging mud.

In post 256, ZZZX wrote:I will make sure that blue scum isnt really off before giving my vote just to make sure we dont lose this. Anyway I think I answered the post you talked about didnt I?

? Not sure what you mean. Please explain.

In post 256, ZZZX wrote:Meanwhile I will believe in the existance of VI-ancy because one clouded judgement will be bad. Right now I have a slight idea who blue scum is.

Name, justify and shame please. Withholding info is not helping town right now.

In post 257, Bert wrote:
In post 255, ZZZX wrote:If either you or me were not blue scum then I would have been instantly hammered.

We don't know who has showed up yet. A set-up quickhammer via daytalk isn't even optimal at this point for blue - the quickhammerer likely gets vengekilled.

As ZZZX said, no venge kill. But the fact noone is willing to jump on this (the two of you being online and interacting) to me identifies one of two things - you don't believe me or you're red scum not wanting to lynch.

ZZZX · Post Post #261 (ISO) » Wed Jul 23, 2014 12:46 pm

In post 260, Drew-Sta wrote:
In post 255, ZZZX wrote:You are aware that by voting me you run into a deep risk. If either you or me were not blue scum then I would have been instantly hammered.

Exactly. You've proven my point. The fact noone has voted for you yet indicates to me that you're likely scum. Town isn't going to quick hammer - red scum are. That noone has jumped on you (which is one of the reasons I voted you - to see who moved quickly) identifies that. At the moment we need to find red scum, and I think I've identified you as one.

In post 255, ZZZX wrote:Looking deeper I found your play interesting. And since I am not seeing any quick hammers Its 75% sure that you are blue scum. I have another reason for believing so.

Go on, I'm willing to listen. Make your case or stop flinging mud.

In post 256, ZZZX wrote:I will make sure that blue scum isnt really off before giving my vote just to make sure we dont lose this. Anyway I think I answered the post you talked about didnt I?

? Not sure what you mean. Please explain.

In post 256, ZZZX wrote:Meanwhile I will believe in the existance of VI-ancy because one clouded judgement will be bad. Right now I have a slight idea who blue scum is.

Name, justify and shame please. Withholding info is not helping town right now.

In post 257, Bert wrote:
In post 255, ZZZX wrote:If either you or me were not blue scum then I would have been instantly hammered.

We don't know who has showed up yet. A set-up quickhammer via daytalk isn't even optimal at this point for blue - the quickhammerer likely gets vengekilled.

As ZZZX said, no venge kill. But the fact noone is willing to jump on this (the two of you being online and interacting) to me identifies one of two things - you don't believe me or you're red scum not wanting to lynch.

Your logic is built on the idea that you are not blue scum. However right now I am sure that you are. Am I wrong? Well I really believe that no town would do such a foolish play. Reminds me of 350 micro alot.

ZZZX · Post Post #262 (ISO) » Wed Jul 23, 2014 12:49 pm

I will make my case later today. give me a sec

Drew-Sta · Post Post #263 (ISO) » Wed Jul 23, 2014 1:01 pm

Your logic is built on the idea that you are not blue scum.

... because I'm not? Your logic is built on the fact I am blue scum and you're

not

red scum. Its a faulty argument.

However right now I am sure that you are. Am I wrong? Well I really believe that no town would do such a foolish play. Reminds me of 350 micro alot.

Laying my balls on the line, and seeing Bert (who, remember, said he was happy to lynch anyone - and jumped right on Rubi and Boon) not vote for you is giving me confidence I'm right here. He's been happy to get a lynch, if he were town, why would he rush so much to lynch those two, but not rush to lynch you? Is he waiting for his scum partner? Or are

you

his scum partner?

We're at Lylo with no real info to make a good decision. I felt we needed a drastic move to get info. I believe you're mafia. I believe you're red mafia too, as if you were blue then Bert would likely vote. And I believe Bert is your accomplice, as he is not voting despite being on and being lynch-happy.

Exactly what about 350 micro are you referencing specifically?

I will make my case later today. give me a sec

5 posts, 45 min, promising I am scum yet no justification. We're waiting.

ZZZX · Post Post #264 (ISO) » Wed Jul 23, 2014 1:32 pm

In post 263, Drew-Sta wrote:
Your logic is built on the idea that you are not blue scum.

... because I'm not? Your logic is built on the fact I am blue scum and you're
not
red scum. Its a faulty argument.

However right now I am sure that you are. Am I wrong? Well I really believe that no town would do such a foolish play. Reminds me of 350 micro alot.

Laying my balls on the line, and seeing Bert (who, remember, said he was happy to lynch anyone - and jumped right on Rubi and Boon) not vote for you is giving me confidence I'm right here. He's been happy to get a lynch, if he were town, why would he rush so much to lynch those two, but not rush to lynch you? Is he waiting for his scum partner? Or are
you
his scum partner?

We're at Lylo with no real info to make a good decision. I felt we needed a drastic move to get info. I believe you're mafia. I believe you're red mafia too, as if you were blue then Bert would likely vote. And I believe Bert is your accomplice, as he is not voting despite being on and being lynch-happy.

Exactly what about 350 micro are you referencing specifically?

I will make my case later today. give me a sec

5 posts, 45 min, promising I am scum yet no justification. We're waiting.

Bolded the slip. You just slipped that you believe I am red scum and not blue. I got it out of you.

Now I told you I will do it later. Didnt I? Maybe telling you to give me a secound was bad wording but in 24 hours you will see it. But your posts are full of team-slips in muiltball. I am 100% sure you are not red scum atm.

ZZZX · Post Post #265 (ISO) » Wed Jul 23, 2014 1:40 pm

This slip convinced me to place a vote on you.

Vote:Drew-Sta

Note: do not hammer anyone until I come back about 8 hours later. Please be careful about lynching as this is lylo.

ZZZX · Post Post #266 (ISO) » Wed Jul 23, 2014 1:40 pm

Do not put anyone at L-1. I put drew at L2 since he is blue so blue team wont be able to quick hammer.

BBmolla · Post Post #267 (ISO) » Wed Jul 23, 2014 1:46 pm

Drew-Sta · Post Post #268 (ISO) » Wed Jul 23, 2014 1:47 pm

@ ZZZX:

Bullshit. I just inverted your argument. Now you're stretching big time.

You claim I'm blue, and that you're town. Which means your argument is (der) based on me being blue and you not being red.

I'm claiming you are red, and Bert is your buddy, because Bert has not voted for you despite me doing so. If Bert was red and you weren't, he'd vote you and his partner would hammer.

My argument is simply the inversion of your claim. The difference is I have onus of proof as I claimed this D2, and have backed it up again.

Drew-Sta · Post Post #269 (ISO) » Wed Jul 23, 2014 1:49 pm

This:

My argument is simply the inversion of your claim. The difference is I have onus of proof as I claimed this D2, and have backed it up again.

... to clarify, I claimed ZZZX was mafia D2. I also claimed Bert was as well, although I was less confident of him.

ZZZX · Post Post #270 (ISO) » Wed Jul 23, 2014 1:52 pm

In post 268, Drew-Sta wrote:@ ZZZX: Bullshit. I just inverted your argument. Now you're stretching big time.

You claim I'm blue, and that you're town. Which means your argument is (der) based on me being blue and you not being red.

I'm claiming you are red, and Bert is your buddy, because Bert has not voted for you despite me doing so. If Bert was red and you weren't, he'd vote you and his partner would hammer.

My argument is simply the inversion of your claim. The difference is I have onus of proof as I claimed this D2, and have backed it up again.

IF I was red you know that blue mafia wins automatically if I get lynched if I were red? Are you THAT bad not to see this.

ZZZX · Post Post #271 (ISO) » Wed Jul 23, 2014 1:52 pm

In post 269, Drew-Sta wrote:This:

My argument is simply the inversion of your claim. The difference is I have onus of proof as I claimed this D2, and have backed it up again.

... to clarify, I claimed ZZZX was mafia D2. I also claimed Bert was as well, although I was less confident of him.

You didnt. YOu gave a reason to scum read me and I explained how its bad and wrong.

BBmolla · Post Post #272 (ISO) » Wed Jul 23, 2014 1:53 pm

I think Drew is the other town

ZZZX · Post Post #273 (ISO) » Wed Jul 23, 2014 1:54 pm

In post 272, BBmolla wrote:I think Drew is the other town

You believe town would vote in Lylo that easily? I dont think so personally.

ZZZX · Post Post #274 (ISO) » Wed Jul 23, 2014 1:55 pm

Actually fuck this I am not taking risks. I dont want to screw this up if he wasnt blue mafia.
UNVOTE:
I will vote once I made up my mind 100%