In post 146, Dr Pants wrote:true, but I play aggressively.
hold back for a sec and lets temporarily olive branch. give me a well thought out case for why I should vote Xay over you. Examine the actual arguments (not BS chest puffing fluff) that I've made and tell me what you agree/disagree with.
pedit:
In post 156, Dr Pants wrote:Ok. Well lets make this a learning experience for you then.
Describe, in detail, what makes me "very scummy". Give a full, comprehensive argument.
1)If you don't believe I've never been lynched, check my wiki and my completed games history. But, tbh, its not relevent
@ Salamance: Ignore your criticism of me and think of it this way: I gave Maru a full argument. I have been transparent. I have said why I am doing what I am doing. I can be hostile towards you if you haven't done anything
2)@ Espresso: Sweet jesus you can be thick. What of my posts is from a scum mindset? use specifics and examples.
3)@ Both of you: remember the part where you can only lynch in your own pool?4)and where you have a good shot of getting scum if you actually put your mind to it?
In post 158, Dr Pants wrote:btw, if you find you and someone within your group have similar thoughts about someone external to the group, then one of you is likely scum
In post 159, Espressojet wrote:
Ok
1)I do believe you. I saidWOULDN'Tbelieve it. Lern 2 grammmrr.
2)I've already clearly laid out posts I think are scummy
3)Do you want me to cease scumhunting you, or anyone else outside my group for that matter? Is that what you're suggesting? Because the scummiest thing anybody can suggest is to stop scumhunting. And I know you're gonna pull the "but i nevr sed 2 stop scumhuntng" crap, but that's what you're clearly saying, that I shouldn't be examining other players right now.
4)Good shot? There's a one in three chance that there isn't even a scum within our group. Jesus, one of our members isn't even HERE. I JUST got here, and I've already figured out what I want to do in this group for myself.
In post 161, Espressojet wrote:In post 158, Dr Pants wrote:btw, if you find you and someone within your group have similar thoughts about someone external to the group, then one of you is likely scum
How is this even?
This just looks like more Town v Town pitfight fodder.
you have to lynch within your group, you probably have scum there, why assume otherwise In post 164, Dr Pants wrote:In post 161, Espressojet wrote:In post 158, Dr Pants wrote:btw, if you find you and someone within your group have similar thoughts about someone external to the group, then one of you is likely scum
How is this even?
This just looks like more Town v Town pitfight fodder.
In post 128, Dr Pants wrote:
I checked the rule list for this game and the original. Scum daytalk is never listed. Everyone in your group should be voting you asap.
In post 134, Dr Pants wrote:I will say though Salamance, the notion that you need to hurry along a lynch cause the rest of the groups are settled is B.S.Use the time you need, and lynch scum. k thx
Earlier:Everyone in your group should be voting youasap
In post 124, Nazarene wrote:In post 63, Not_Mafia wrote:Initial thoughts are that there is almost definitely a scum in Huckleberries. I lile Xayzeck, for the scumbutt I was thinking Pants initially for his seeming paranoia in RVS. Now leaning Maru, hated their opening and their Xayzeck read. Pants and Maru should be cross voting.
Why is there definitely a scumball? Anything beyond the individual suspicions of Pants/Maru?
In post 82, Maruchan wrote:And now Pants lost his town read.
79 says in layman's terms "i think you're scum because i already committed myself to buddying xayzeck and called him town so i can't call maruchan town he must be scum"
