InuYasha Mafia (Game Over)

geists · Post Post #3125 (ISO) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 4:34 am

In post 3119, Birds of Prey wrote:It called what? There was no moon logic there to my recollection. Hell that was a rare game where I didn't actually pursue anyone as scum (which probably is the biggest red flag of Titus unless I'm not caught up).

It called asking for its titus moonlogic.

I followed the game, didn't play it. I thought your stances were riddled with moon logic.

Birds of Prey · Post Post #3126 (ISO) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 4:35 am

My comments haven't been about Xof. I've been ignoring that for the time behing.

My points are solely about the Y and B claim.

That being said, I am suspicious of a commuter here but not totally ruling it out.

Birds of Prey · Post Post #3127 (ISO) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 4:36 am

In post 3125, geists wrote:
In post 3119, Birds of Prey wrote:It called what? There was no moon logic there to my recollection. Hell that was a rare game where I didn't actually pursue anyone as scum (which probably is the biggest red flag of Titus unless I'm not caught up).

It called asking for its titus moonlogic.

I followed the game, didn't play it. I thought your stances were riddled with moon logic.

Well great. I guess you're the first who thinks I moon logic as scum since the point is so minor that it's not worth turning this thread into a shitstorm over.

Egg · Post Post #3128 (ISO) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 4:57 am

In post 3126, Birds of Prey wrote:My comments haven't been about Xof. I've been ignoring that for the time behing.

My points are solely about the Y and B claim.

That being said, I am suspicious of a commuter here but not totally ruling it out.

Pretty sure Mhork was responding to Moogle.

ProHawk · Post Post #3129 (ISO) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 5:08 am

What is moon logic?

Egg · Post Post #3130 (ISO) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 5:10 am

Astrology

Lord Mhork · Post Post #3131 (ISO) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 5:10 am

I was talking about the xof claim and that it is totally reasonable. Is also be hesitant to believe another commuter in Always.

Though let's be real it's not a stretch to think scum has a role blocker here.

Moogle Dance Troupe · Post Post #3132 (ISO) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 5:27 am

Why is xof commuting totally reasonable? Do you think a one-shot undead detector would draw a nightkill in this game?

Lord Mhork · Post Post #3133 (ISO) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 6:16 am

...because she has nine abilities. Abilities are scare.

Always · Post Post #3134 (ISO) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 6:21 am

In post 3120, Birds of Prey wrote:
In post 3118, Lord Mhork wrote:I think commuting makes sense when you claim a really big power role >.>

Then Always wouldn't need to check with the mod to see if they got anything. They'd know they were untargetable, say so like I essentially implied.

We're not a commuter... Where are you getting this from?

Moogle Dance Troupe · Post Post #3135 (ISO) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 6:24 am

In post 3133, Lord Mhork wrote:...because she has nine abilities. Abilities are scare.

Most of which she's claimed are useless.

Majiffy · Post Post #3136 (ISO) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 6:32 am

In post 3114, Moogle Dance Troupe wrote:xof claimed in 2189.

I see.

Im not chasing wild bats unless molla wants to fullclaim becsuse he doesn't even sound certain of his roles implications.

Lord Mhork · Post Post #3137 (ISO) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 6:36 am

Because when you're strong you announce it to the town?

Moogle Dance Troupe · Post Post #3138 (ISO) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 6:45 am

When you announce weakness, and are a lurksack with an extremely suspicious claim, you don't expect to draw a nightkill. If anything, you hope to draw an investigation and/or a roleblock.

Moogle Dance Troupe · Post Post #3139 (ISO) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 6:48 am

I don't think BB's counterclaim is wildly relevant here, since anything I can imagine BB having that would make him think the claim is false existing twice in a 28 player game.

I do think the claimed commute is bizarre, and that the claimed abilities don't make flavor-sense.

Moogle Dance Troupe · Post Post #3140 (ISO) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 6:49 am

imagine anything*

Always · Post Post #3141 (ISO) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 7:02 am

Okay so I think either y&b were either rb'd or we were jailed of some type.

Rather give Y&B another day to target someone as their claim is confirmable

Majiffy · Post Post #3142 (ISO) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 7:04 am

I know nothing of flavor and dont see a reason to fos xof now or before.

ActionDan · Post Post #3143 (ISO) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 7:04 am

In post 3142, Majiffy wrote:I know nothing of flavor and dont see a reason to fos xof now or before.

In post 3138, Moogle Dance Troupe wrote:When you announce weakness, and are a lurksack with an extremely suspicious claim, you don't expect to draw a nightkill. If anything, you hope to draw an investigation and/or a roleblock.

geists · Post Post #3144 (ISO) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 7:05 am

In post 3141, Always wrote:
Okay so I think either y&b were either rb'd or we were jailed of some type.

Rather give Y&B another day to target someone as their claim is confirmable

This doesn't compute.

geists · Post Post #3145 (ISO) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 7:07 am

In post 3129, ProHawk wrote:What is moon logic?

The sort of logic that looks illogical, but if you squint really hard and tilt your head you might be able to see some perspective from which it makes sense.

There's a hint of internal consistency iow.

Majiffy · Post Post #3146 (ISO) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 7:08 am

In post 3143, ActionDan wrote:
In post 3142, Majiffy wrote:I know nothing of flavor and dont see a reason to fos xof now or before.

In post 3138, Moogle Dance Troupe wrote:When you announce weakness, and are a lurksack with an extremely suspicious claim, you don't expect to draw a nightkill. If anything, you hope to draw an investigation and/or a roleblock.

The claim was a massive joat yes? Id expect a nk

Majiffy · Post Post #3147 (ISO) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 7:09 am

In post 3144, geists wrote:
In post 3141, Always wrote:
Okay so I think either y&b were either rb'd or we were jailed of some type.

Rather give Y&B another day to target someone as their claim is confirmable

This doesn't compute.

It does its just dumb

Majiffy · Post Post #3148 (ISO) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 7:10 am

Actually no nvm no half competent mod could deliver the same report for those two events

ISO · Post Post #3149 (ISO) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 7:12 am