In post 2869, Le Cupcake wrote:I'll put it simply that I have reasons to believe Lem's claim is not fake.
I would probably like to vote this, if I knew who it was... also they have some 'splanin to do.
In post 2869, Le Cupcake wrote:I'll put it simply that I have reasons to believe Lem's claim is not fake.
In post 588, ActionDan wrote:I would appreciate it that if a vig is considering shooting Rhaego tonight they instead pick someone else.
In post 2028, Egg wrote:In post 2013, notscience wrote:Can someone tell me why only like 2 people questioned rhaego early while he posts bullshit questions that he doesn't follow up and naked votes all the time while avoiding what's going on
I personally didn't because someone crumbed something about him
In post 2983, Venmar wrote:You were like the last vote, and you were all like "GUYS GUYS, CMON, LEMNI IS A CONFIRMABLE PLAYER, LAY OFF" to begin with, so there's like nothing townie about your place on that wagon.
In post 96, ActionDan wrote:In post 87, Always wrote:What I really need to say is this. Normally, I'd just leave this comment as be. But it's actually really, REALLY important that I get an answer from you, Dan, if this is confirmed knowledge or just speculation. It makes a huge difference in something that could be a massive advantage to the town, but I need to know for sure.)
Well if it's important to you Mastin-sama:
A 28 player game would suggest two factions or more since a 7p scum team in a 28 player base is rather unwieldy imo, but it happens to be the case thatI have role info that very much suggests two factions.You should work with that assumption.
In post 2987, Svenskt Stål wrote:In post 2983, Venmar wrote:You were like the last vote, and you were all like "GUYS GUYS, CMON, LEMNI IS A CONFIRMABLE PLAYER, LAY OFF" to begin with, so there's like nothing townie about your place on that wagon.
Lol. just amazing detective work.
Have fun pushing me, you are too dumb for me to waste time on.
In post 2911, neil1113 wrote:WOAH
WOAH
WOAH
WOAH
WHAT?!?!?!?
Really? We're pushing a lynch on a claim that is EASILY able to be proven, rather than pushing a lynch on somebody that someone has EVIDENCE in their own flavor that the other person is lying, and is nearly confirmed scum?
Because of deadline?
Yeah no. I'm more in favor of lynching scum, then lynching a testable claim that can be potentially dangerous to scum, all because of deadline. The fact that you're still even pushing up a wagon, knowing that someone is not able to be killed at night and would be a danger to scum, is literally doing scum's job for them. What the hell is wrong with you?
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Shos
Mist is just an inactive person that suddenly came alive near deadline. I don't like that, but with a claim like Shos, I feel like Shos would be the better lynch subject. I didn't realize Majiffy had evidence.
(Sorry Majiffy.)
P.S. Molla is basically confirmed scum. Look at that ISO, look at it... tell me I'm wrong.
In post 2984, Egg wrote:These delayed flips are annoying.
I skimmed over what I missed during the night. Seems most of what I didn't respond to is outdated now. If anyone wants a response to something specific, let me know. Looked over Bulbafenix a little too. I felt like they didn't do anything, but they have plenty of content posts and are actively talking and stuff.
Not sure what to make of one kill. Kind of expected three (2 scum groups and some kind of SK or vig).If that's the case, the other group is probably pretty evenly split between being on and off the wagon while his buddies are probably at the height of the Mist wagon and late shos push with maybe one bussing late. I feel like with so many votes and so few flips, it might be useless to look too deep into all of that just now though.The flavor of the flip suggests two groups still though.
I'll wait for AngryIec's flip for much more though.
Oh and one more thing.
In post 588, ActionDan wrote:I would appreciate it that if a vig is considering shooting Rhaego tonight they instead pick someone else.
Why'd you say this? I originally took it as a mason crumb then his slot claimed mason and flipped scum. Almost looks like you crumbed it but later abondoned it to bus. I subtly referred to this here:
In post 2028, Egg wrote:In post 2013, notscience wrote:Can someone tell me why only like 2 people questioned rhaego early while he posts bullshit questions that he doesn't follow up and naked votes all the time while avoiding what's going on
I personally didn't because someone crumbed something about him
You guys also both talked about your roles suggesting we have two scum teams. I kind of feel like we should know what this was all about before I say we have a connection to dead scum here.
Preview edit: the thing I quoted above shows that notscience went after that slot too
In post 2981, shos wrote:so my opinoin is that undead are scum and demons are town
In post 2993, Svenskt Stål wrote:And the number of kills didnt tip you off?