X-Men: Age of Apocalypse (Game Over)

My Milked Eek · Post Post #925 (ISO) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 6:56 am

PFFFFFFFF

Now I have to do some work to really derail my wagon onto Titus.

Titus · Post Post #926 (ISO) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 6:57 am

In post 922, borkjerfkin wrote:I think Eek is town.

No. He has been playing to scum wincon. Our hood has two scum. Feu and Eek.

ISO · Post Post #927 (ISO) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 6:57 am

This insta-sensor plan from eek makes sense exactly in the scenario that eek is town who misread #3 and #4 and no other scenario

Feu et Vol · Post Post #928 (ISO) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 6:57 am

why the fuck were we talking about policy lynches in the neighborhood then if those only apply to scum lynches

Rogue · Post Post #929 (ISO) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 6:58 am

Aaaaaand Mala is out. Time for work.

Ugh, mme. Why reading is key. ._.

Oh Skot is scum btw~

Feu et Vol · Post Post #930 (ISO) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 6:58 am

BORK I'M BLAMING YOU FOR SOMETHING

Titus · Post Post #931 (ISO) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 6:58 am

In post 925, My Milked Eek wrote:PFFFFFFFF

Now I have to do some work to really derail my wagon onto Titus.

See. Told you it was all aboyt saving Eek.

Not moving.

Venmar · Post Post #932 (ISO) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 6:58 am

@Borkjerfkin

In post 789, Venmar wrote:
In post 786, borkjerfkin wrote:Titus is providing us with an easy out low-risk lynch in case we get jammed up and need to get credit for the objective if we can't decide on anyone else that we think is scum in time.

Soo... like she said we can lynch her if all else fails or something?

ISO · Post Post #933 (ISO) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 6:58 am

In post 928, Feu et Vol wrote:why the fuck were we talking about policy lynches in the neighborhood then if those only apply to scum lynches

#1, @2, and @5 can be hit on any lynch. I talked about all this in my post.

My Milked Eek · Post Post #934 (ISO) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 6:59 am

In post 931, Titus wrote:
In post 925, My Milked Eek wrote:PFFFFFFFF

Now I have to do some work to really derail my wagon onto Titus.

See. Told you it was all aboyt saving Eek.

Not moving.

You're an idiot.

Feu et Vol · Post Post #935 (ISO) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 7:00 am

ughhh.

the problem now is

with titus as our only near-confirmed scum

lynching her won't even get objectives 3 or 4

since she'll just refuse to selfvote

Titus · Post Post #936 (ISO) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 7:00 am

In post 927, borkjerfkin wrote:This insta-sensor plan from eek makes sense exactly in the scenario that eek is town who misread #3 and #4 and no other scenario

It does. He's hoping town ignore it to push my lynch through and it bit him on the ass.

It is implausible to know the objectives but not know they requires scum lynched.

ISO · Post Post #937 (ISO) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 7:00 am

In post 932, Venmar wrote:Soo... like she said we can lynch her if all else fails or something?

I'm warming up to it. Conflicts with a lot of my early game thoughts but I see no town motivation in being obstinate about the eek wagon. I see scum motivation if she saw what I saw.

ISO · Post Post #938 (ISO) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 7:00 am

In post 935, Feu et Vol wrote:lynching her won't even get objectives 3 or 4

Give to a different hood.

My Milked Eek · Post Post #939 (ISO) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 7:00 am

I'm scum because I wanted to optimize the hammer order and I wanted to give us a sensor N1? Get real and stop grasping.

ISO · Post Post #940 (ISO) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 7:01 am

In post 936, Titus wrote:It is implausible to know the objectives but not know they requires scum lynched.

Disagree.

Venmar · Post Post #941 (ISO) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 7:01 am

In post 937, borkjerfkin wrote:
In post 932, Venmar wrote:Soo... like she said we can lynch her if all else fails or something?

I'm warming up to it. Conflicts with a lot of my early game thoughts but I see no town motivation in being obstinate about the eek wagon. I see scum motivation if she saw what I saw.

I was hoping for a yes or no answer, or just a simple explanation. Because I still fail to see anything pro-town in her claim.

Titus · Post Post #942 (ISO) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 7:01 am

There is town motivation. It is called I want EEK SCUM DEAD.

Feu et Vol · Post Post #943 (ISO) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 7:01 am

In post 933, borkjerfkin wrote:
In post 928, Feu et Vol wrote:why the fuck were we talking about policy lynches in the neighborhood then if those only apply to scum lynches

#1, @2, and @5 can be hit on any lynch. I talked about all this in my post.

ok.

i assumed policy lynching applied to all 1 3 and 4.

5 is out of the picture today and i don't think 2 is possible until titus is dead and even then it's just a chance.

pedit fucking 4 times

ISO · Post Post #944 (ISO) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 7:02 am

In post 941, Venmar wrote:I was hoping for a yes or no answer, or just a simple explanation. Because I still fail to see anything pro-town in her claim.

Well I don't have these for you. I explained why I felt how I did about her claim.

Titus · Post Post #945 (ISO) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 7:02 am

I don't trust Feu to stay on Eek.

My Milked Eek · Post Post #946 (ISO) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 7:03 am

In post 942, Titus wrote:There is town motivation. It is called I want EEK SCUM DEAD.

Only if you hammer <3

Venmar · Post Post #947 (ISO) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 7:04 am

Omg just reword the below, it's confusing wording for me.

In post 786, borkjerfkin wrote:Titus is providing us with an easy out low-risk lynch in case we get jammed up and need to get credit for the objective if we can't decide on anyone else that we think is scum in time.

My Milked Eek · Post Post #948 (ISO) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 7:04 am

Ironically, you had your chance.

Titus · Post Post #949 (ISO) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 7:04 am

Bork suppose Eek and Feu are scum...now does being stubborn make sense?