In post 347, Majiffy wrote:Huh? Link.
The whole 'Venmar is scum' thing had a tenet that Venmar voted the strongest hood on purpose
In post 347, Majiffy wrote:Huh? Link.
In post 325, Ultimate Life Form wrote:There is no player that I want to vehemently policy lynch at all
In post 341, Ultimate Life Form wrote:Let's policy lynch eek because 2/3 objectives okay
It's nothing personal
In post 350, borkjerfkin wrote:In post 347, Majiffy wrote:Huh? Link.
The whole 'Venmar is scum' thing had a tenet that Venmar voted the strongest hood on purpose
In post 344, borkjerfkin wrote:In post 342, Nero Cain wrote:<---is not buddying with bork
wouldn't really expect you to. I can literally not remember a single time you've townread me in any game ever even when I town the fuck out of the thread
In post 356, Nero Cain wrote:never knew I had a scumread on you...
In post 133, Titus wrote:Thank you Rogue.
I don't give two shits as to whether you like me or so. I give two shits about lynching scum.
To believe Venmar you'd have to believe
A) That Venmar is careless and did not read his role PM.
B)Venmar is careless and did not read the info post, knowing RVS would deny a power.
C) That his random vote accidently hit the most powerful hood in the game.
Nope. It is much more likely Venmar too calculated inaction and just chatted in his scum topic.
In post 351, Nero Cain wrote:So if we are going to pl to achieve an objective why ekk over Titus?
That his random vote accidently hit the most powerful hood in the game.
In post 366, ika wrote:isnt everyone gonna say "MY HOOD IS BEST"?
In post 63, Titus wrote:That being said, if we did lynch in our hoid, I would want to lynch Feu and you're townreading them.
In post 66, borkjerfkin wrote:You don't use sensor on neighborhoods
In post 90, borkjerfkin wrote:In my hood Brian was the one I felt was looking busy w/o really contributing to the plan, but I don't have much stock in that considering the infancy of the game.
In post 162, Titus wrote:Ok then eek or bork is probably scum.
In post 197, Majiffy wrote:In post 53, borkjerfkin wrote:In post 50, My Milked Eek wrote:@bork: Which is why we're voted obviously.
Unfortunately we're voted either because of negligence or a deliberate attempt to sabotage and it's too early for me to figure out who is doing which
Right in front of you, methinks...
In post 361, borkjerfkin wrote:In post 351, Nero Cain wrote:So if we are going to pl to achieve an objective why ekk over Titus?
Why Titus for you? I don't recall you explaining