In post 2423, geists wrote:In post 2417, Majiffy wrote:But you haven't given me anything to work with. All of your interactions have been skin-deep at best.
"skin-deep".
Pretty sure my ISO says otherwise.
In post 2425, Majiffy wrote:In post 2423, geists wrote:In post 2417, Majiffy wrote:But you haven't given me anything to work with. All of your interactions have been skin-deep at best.
"skin-deep".
Pretty sure my ISO says otherwise.
Show me your great big deep insightful reach-outs to me.
In post 2044, Lemniscate wrote:I can't defend against what other people did. This is another strawmanning attempt.
Nobody has actually made any case on me, but rather my predecessors. I have nothing to say to their play, I'm not them. I have no idea why they played that way. All I can say is a quick meta on Rhaego, is his play style matches his play here. Regardless of alignment. Wake literally only posted twice and then replaced out, there wasn't even enough time to read Wake.
The case on me is terrible, though it doesn't surprise me that a wagon has formed on me, seeing the terrible people on the wagon right now. I've already had scum reads on several of them, before they ever jumped on board.
Like for example:
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Nero Cain
In post 2428, notscience wrote:In post 2044, Lemniscate wrote:I can't defend against what other people did. This is another strawmanning attempt.
Nobody has actually made any case on me, but rather my predecessors. I have nothing to say to their play, I'm not them. I have no idea why they played that way. All I can say is a quick meta on Rhaego, is his play style matches his play here. Regardless of alignment. Wake literally only posted twice and then replaced out, there wasn't even enough time to read Wake.
The case on me is terrible, though it doesn't surprise me that a wagon has formed on me, seeing the terrible people on the wagon right now. I've already had scum reads on several of them, before they ever jumped on board.
Like for example:
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Nero Cain
this game
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 1#p4968751
Sitcom
In post 2429, geists wrote:Majiffy wrote:
You know I can provide a lengthy list of day 1s illustrating why.
In post 2433, notscience wrote:QUESTION
Did I read soemthing about Rhaego being a secret alt
pedit-
Because she felt like noone gave a shit. There's so much going on, she felt overwhelmed (which was in her iso btw). So what if she didn't mention names. Half the playerlist has lurked and hasn't even mentioned half the game.
She yelled at Nati for calling anything she's done surface level. She's a newbie. Are you telling me you had deep insights in your first game, let alone one with 28 fucking players?
Newbscum reaction wouldn't have been such a violent reaction. They are more tame.
In post 2435, Majiffy wrote:In post 2429, geists wrote:Majiffy wrote:
You know I can provide a lengthy list of day 1s illustrating why.
Oh boy, D1 lynches that flipped town? Thatneverhappens! You should probably just ignore me because*lengthy list*!
Don't give me your bullshit ffery.
In post 2439, notscience wrote:I think you fully believe in your push
however I'm not sheeping you for similar reasons to me being obstinate in frozen
In post 2421, Majiffy wrote:
Is this to me?
If so;
1) Why is the lynch bad?
2) What are my reasons for pushing shos-scum?
3) Which points do you agree with, if any? Disagree with? Why?
4) Fuck off.
In post 2441, geists wrote:No, I'm talking about day 1's where scum was lynched while you yelled all the way to deadline about some town player you wanted to lynch.
In post 2440, notscience wrote:Also-
When you make an alt to hide your main account's meta it's to succeed better as one alignment. Which is it?
Do you think if they got that alignment they'd play that fucking useless all game?
