Nocmen's claim does at least explain the kill discussion tell (people discussing specific notable events that happened overnight are more likely to be responsible for those actions). I have no doubt that he was responsible for the death of DW last night, so that means one of two things - he's the vig, or he's the SK.
Nocmen wrote:I wouldn't lynch someone I know wasn't an SK.
What did you mean by this?
Cogito Ergo Scum wrote:I can see good meta-reasons why a vig would fire night 0.
Maybe. I'd like to hear Nocmen's reasons though. Why did he fire, and why did he fire at DeanWinchester?
Cogito Ergo Scum wrote:Also, since he's revealed, it's best to keep him alive. We can tell him who to kill each night, and basically make him the town's second lynch, even if he's the sk.
You're Pie, aren't you?
Are we going to get into aggro-vigging v informed lynching arguments again?
Cogito Ergo Scum wrote:That said,
Unvote
. If the mafia are dead and the game isn't over yet, we know who to lynch, at least.
Keeping scums alive is an undervalued tactic.
It's not a tactic I value.
I'm willing to argue the strategy in detail if necessary, but am wary of them clogging up the thread.
Keeping my vote for now. I'll do a more thorough review shortly.
PPE:
Nocmen wrote:At first, I was concerned about my role because i thought it was not optional, as in I was forced to kill every night. However, I soon realized that it was optional to kill in my role, so I was just lucky that I hit scum last night.
What lead you to realise the kill was optional, and when did you realise this?
