Why are you redirecting this ? If I think that Nocmen and VD are scum, logic dictates that I concentrate my efforts on them.1. Whome?
2. Tony Montana
3. Occult
You seem awfully anxious to turn what is primarily a strike against you into somehow aiding in clearing in you.ABR wrote:Yes, this post. It only helps me to clear myself. The topic changes as well do nothing but justify what I've previously stated.
More exaggeration- this occurred about three posts down from when you asked the doc question. I will, however, concede that it certainly could be a move to confirm Net's role.ABR wrote:Why would Nocmen insist on that post pages after the fact ? It was a calculated move to confirm doc's indentity, me says.
And what cue is that? The one where Net confirms that yes he meant a doctor?ABR wrote:Look at the posting times between net's slip and my post. I thought I was being smart about guessing a cue, apparently not.
You seem to be missing the point-ABR wrote:Look, what has Nocmen done at all to contribute ? He's only pressured net into talking about his doctor theory. Tell me, what good would that do from a townie standpoint ???
I was wondering when this was coming. You've created quite a trend of attacking those attacking you. I'll go back and read Nocmen specifically to see how I feel about his overall contribution.ABR wrote:He's done nothing but being a nuissance to the town all game, and VD, likewise. Creating chaos with his cross-voting non-sense to free his scum mate Nocmen. Don't embark in their game unless your part of it.
So you can't have an opinion on anyone else?ABR wrote:Why are you redirecting this ? If I think that Nocmen and VD are scum, logic dictates that I concentrate my efforts on them.
This first, because it's easier to sort out. Now that's its over. Yes, I was scum in that other game, the one where blagho also claimed early. I am not here. The early mason claim still makes no sense. To be clear, he told the truth in that other early claim, whether or not this is, I honestly cannot say.blagho wrote:VanDemeain is scum here and in another game to be named later. vote:VanDamien
First, if your either choose to not read my posts or choose to ignore them, that's your choice. Either way, the last was far from contentless.ABR wrote:He's done nothing but being a nuissance to the town all game, and VD, likewise. Creating chaos with his cross-voting non-sense to free his scum mate Nocmen. Don't embark in their game unless your part of it.
See, watch him lie again.Nocmen wrote:Response to Occult's 168: I have suspected Albert since even though net slip up like that, Albert still criticized net before and after that, claiming that net was scum. Net had basically role claimed, and yet Albert was like "ok, lets lynch him still". That is why I voted for Albert.
Comment so far in bold.Occult wrote:Time for real questions:
-Who is looking scummiest?
ABR, Nocmen, and WhoMe?
-Who is lying? Nocman or Rampage?
Rampage, for reasons to be detailed below.
-Do you see my vote on VD as Scummy
No, I see it as attempting to start discussion, a feeling I an empathize with, as my intentions are similar.
-WhoMe, scum or just slipped up?
Potentially both
-blahgo, your thoughts on him?
Undecided as yet. To confirm his claim is potentially a waste of a lynch, to not confirm is awfully trusting for mafia. Something to look at in the future, depending on how the game progresses.
These seem to be the major issues from the last few pages. If you don't want to give your oppion on them that's fine, I just wanted to point these out.
DYH has already pointed this out:ABR wrote:He said I went after net before and after his slip.
Nocmen, Quote Me.
To which you responded:DYH wrote:You seem to be missing the point- you asked if he meant a doctor. Not Nocmen, not VD, not anyone else. You specifically asked it. That's what brought this on.
Which doesn't make since to me, because even if it was ambiguous, if you aren't scum, why would you want the doc to come out and say it directly, given a chance that it was missed?ABR wrote:4. I thought the meaning was ambiguous at first. I asked for clarification. Nocmen went on and interpreted his answer. Cut me some slack.
Which you have ignored.DYH wrote:Pardon me for not understanding how you asking if he meant a doctor does anything helpful in your favor. Sure, if you'd only posted the bit about the wiki and laughed it up with Occult over that, I could have seen it as an attention shift. The fact that you asked the question, though, then changed the subject one minute later doesn't speak to me the same way you seem to think it should.
No, it isn't because I hadn't read about the "tells that someone's a doctor" page. I asked to link something he said with the game, and wasn't going after him at all, which I think was clear from my posts.Nocmen wrote:Actually Albert, by post 61, is that not you asking if your assumption of net as a doctor is correct?
I still say it's WhoMe?, though the interactions between VD, Nocmen, and Albert are making me think...Occult wrote:-Who is looking scummiest?
Still not sure...I need to go reread their posts.-Who is lying? Nocman or Rampage?
No. As I saw it, it was for discussion.-Do you see my vote on VD as Scummy
I doubt it was a slip-up. I'll reread his stuff for good measure. But my vote still stays there.-WhoMe, scum or just slipped up?
He strikes me really suspiciously, but I don't think he merits a vote at this point.-blahgo, your thoughts on him?
All fine and stuff. But then there's this one from the previous page:Albert B. Rampage wrote:Nocmen wrote:I originally just took it as a random accusations to start the game. But here Net has gone and practially told us he is a Doctor from my best guess, and you still are going after him.
Basing your accusation on that sole argument justifies my vote for you
Unvote, vote: Nocmen
because its PAINFULLY clear that he wasn't referring to himself as doctor. This is not his first slip either, you have no reason to believe he meant that.
netixriqua wrote:no you are not alone there is someone watching over us
For all we know, Net could have claimed "i was addressing to God" to cover up a slip-up on his part. From that, I don't think it was "painfully clear" at all that he wasn't referring to himself as a doctor.Albert B. Rampage wrote:You mean a doctor ?
That's not actually true at all. I'm suspicious of Albert because I think he made a move to get Net to confirm that he was the doctor. I don't see where you think he "attacked" net post-reveal. You seem to be reaching a bit here to throw some dirt.Nocmen wrote:Response to Occult's 168: I have suspected Albert since even though net slip up like that, Albert still criticized net before and after that, claiming that net was scum. Net had basically role claimed, and yet Albert was like "ok, lets lynch him still". That is why I voted for Albert.
However, looking at the thread again, this stuck in my mind:ABR wrote:He said I went after net before and after his slip.
Nocmen, Quote Me.
Which IS clearly a lie. Net had not basically claimed. Truthfully, at that point he had hinted both cop and doc, neither very strongly. And while ABR's looking for clarification on the doc thing still seems somewhat fishy to me, he certainly didn't press for a lynch of Net at any time after that.Nocmen wrote:Response to Occult's 168: I have suspected Albert since even though net slip up like that, Albert still criticized net before and after that, claiming that net was scum.Net had basically role claimed, and yet Albert was like "ok, lets lynch him still".That is why I voted for Albert.
