Is that a claim, or did I miss something?
A tracker can actually gain information while the IC can't. Secondly if they did claim to track scum the chances are we would follow what they said and lynch that person. If they lied about their role we would find out when their "track" was wrong thus getting us a guaranteed scum lynch one way or another.In post 453, Finglove wrote:Is that a claim, or did I miss something?
Can we stop and think about the night kill for a moment? It seems odd to me. Given there was a reasonable chance we'd lynch tn today, why leave the innocent child alive? It's possible the tracker would track scum, but would we have believed him?
Remember when everyone said that setup discussion at the beginning of the game was a bunch of irrelevant bullshit?In post 456, beastcharizard wrote:The scum also know the PRs that they picked so lets say they chose none for themselves that leaves town with only two PRs.
I agree with this, I'm not interested in entertaining the WIFOM of katen-scum pulling this gambit off, and it means I need to do a hard reset that I do not have time for today or tomorrow.In post 455, Paschendale wrote:That DOES seal it. Scum knows that. They killed TN and not me. To me, the plan looks really obvious. Night kill TN, get Katen quicklynched, and then night kill me. 4 dead townies and not a whole lot of discussion.
In post 459, Paschendale wrote:Or, you know, they killed the competing wagon and had no idea what role TN had.
CORRECT!!In post 457, Desperado wrote:Remember when everyone said that setup discussion at the beginning of the game was a bunch of irrelevant bullshit?In post 456, beastcharizard wrote:The scum also know the PRs that they picked so lets say they chose none for themselves that leaves town with only two PRs.
I'll accept your apologies individually.
Sneak preview: this guy is probably town, but wrong.
You're too intelligent to not realise that what will happen with a vote like this, is another day of pointless arguing over whether Katen's scum with or without TN. This is an entirely safe scum-vote peng.
Can you point out to me where people were saying it was irrelevant bullshit as opposed to anti-town?In post 457, Desperado wrote:Remember when everyone said that setup discussion at the beginning of the game was a bunch of irrelevant bullshit?In post 456, beastcharizard wrote:The scum also know the PRs that they picked so lets say they chose none for themselves that leaves town with only two PRs.
I'll accept your apologies individually.
We'll start with gooncopIn post 463, beastcharizard wrote:Can you name me some non-powerful PRs?
My gut is very confident!In post 467, beastcharizard wrote:VOTE: Burning_Earth
You are sitting on the fence so much right now.
You can't even give a confident reason to townread someone.
This post just screams confident! Oh wait it screams the exact opposite.
Hey, look at that, someone defending Katengecchi. Who said I want to spend the day arguing? I'm also just fine with lynching Katengecchi. And why would we argue over whether Katengecchi's scum *with* tn541?In post 468, talah wrote:You're too intelligent to not realise that what will happen with a vote like this, is another day of pointless arguing over whether Katen's scum with or without TN. This is an entirely safe scum-vote peng.
Don't you think that by vote-parking on Katen right out of the gates you'd just be *inviting* discussion on Katen's alignment with regard to TN's? Or do you have a push/scumread on Katen? You declined to lynch them yesterday. Associatives come into play since we've seen TN's flip.In post 473, penguin_alien wrote:Hey, look at that, someone defending Katengecchi. Who said I want to spend the day arguing? I'm also just fine with lynching Katengecchi. And why would we argue over whether Katengecchi's scum *with* tn541?In post 468, talah wrote:You're too intelligent to not realise that what will happen with a vote like this, is another day of pointless arguing over whether Katen's scum with or without TN. This is an entirely safe scum-vote peng.
