Event Card Mafia (Game Over)

[Juls]

So if you are town, now might be a good time to claim and such...

[Nachomamma8]

This is the dumbest fucking wagon I've ever seen in my entire life.

It's not that dumb. I think you should be able to appreciate why it is a very rational wagon.

If townNacho legit made up a syntax that just happened to match the mafia one, then I'm sorry, but it's pretty damning.

You think I should appreciate why it's a rational wagon because I veto'ed like the mafia veto.
How did would I know the proper syntax for the mafia veto?
(By reading the rules.)

[Nachomamma8]

So if you are town, now might be a good time to claim and such...

I'm going to catch up and provide reads so we have somewhere to go after my claim.
If you want to completely fuck over town and destroy my perception of you as a mafia player, go right ahead.

[Nachomamma8]

This is the dumbest fucking wagon I've ever seen in my entire life.

It's not that dumb. I think you should be able to appreciate why it is a very rational wagon.

If townNacho legit made up a syntax that just happened to match the mafia one, then I'm sorry, but it's pretty damning.

You think I should appreciate why it's a rational wagon because I veto'ed like the mafia veto.
How did would I know the proper syntax for the mafia veto?
(By reading the rules.)

Like are you fucking serious?

[Juls]

No by seeing it in the mafia thread. My suspicion is one or you did it and that person read the rules. The rest of you just assumed the syntax was the same for town and you slipped.

[Juls]

One of you*

[Nachomamma8]

Or... I skimmed the first page when looking up how to veto and grabbed it from mafia veto.
Why is this unreasonable?

[Nachomamma8]

Why is that possibility so much stronger than the other one where it warrants this incredibly, incredibly opportunistic flashwagon a day before deadline?

[Juls]

We have 21 hours so make it quick

[Nachomamma8]

Why? Should it not depend on who is in that room?
Imagine 3 lurkers in one room.

Mafia can nominate a mafia lurker in the room if they feel they won't get lynched, or they can nominate a town lurker. If they are smart, the majority of the people nominated will be town, meaning it's incredibly bad to lynch someone from a mafia choice nominated room, and from the number of lurkers we have in this game, that means the pool of people we should actually lynch will be very, very small: this sucks when we're not even guaranteed scum in our rooms.

[Nachomamma8]

@ nacho:
A Veto must be used the Day before it activates. A veto causes a new set of cards to be drawn (both regular and lylo). Any veto that occurs within 48 hours of the deadline will push the deadline to be 48 hours after the veto. Vetoes may not be used in "twilight" (i.e. after the hammer or after the deadline).

That is in the rules for veto

You I'm worried about too many lurkers and possible things that can get screwed more then it helping.

Veto: nomination

OH LOOK FARSIDE USED SCUM SYNTAX I'M ABSOLUTELY SURE SHE'S COMPLETELY FUCKING SCUM

[Nachomamma8]

[Iecerint]

This is the dumbest fucking wagon I've ever seen in my entire life.

It's not that dumb. I think you should be able to appreciate why it is a very rational wagon.

If townNacho legit made up a syntax that just happened to match the mafia one, then I'm sorry, but it's pretty damning.

You think I should appreciate why it's a rational wagon because I veto'ed like the mafia veto.
How did would I know the proper syntax for the mafia veto?
(By reading the rules.)

You would know mafia syntax because the mafia had just vetoed Day of the Dead in the mafia QT. We know they did because it was vetoed.

@ nacho:
A Veto must be used the Day before it activates. A veto causes a new set of cards to be drawn (both regular and lylo). Any veto that occurs within 48 hours of the deadline will push the deadline to be 48 hours after the veto. Vetoes may not be used in "twilight" (i.e. after the hammer or after the deadline).

That is in the rules for veto

You I'm worried about too many lurkers and possible things that can get screwed more then it helping.

Veto: nomination

OH LOOK FARSIDE USED SCUM SYNTAX I'M ABSOLUTELY SURE SHE'S COMPLETELY FUCKING SCUM

That was after you had already used the scum syntax; you can explain this away as her seeing your veto syntax and assuming it was appropriate.

[AGar]

Or... I skimmed the first page when looking up how to veto and grabbed it from mafia veto.
Why is this unreasonable?

Because the Town Veto is above the Mafia Veto.

I checked.
There's bold.

Urscum.

OH LOOK FARSIDE USED SCUM SYNTAX I'M ABSOLUTELY SURE SHE'S COMPLETELY FUCKING SCUM

After you did in-thread.

I can do this all day.

GGscum.

[Nachomamma8]

Papa Zito actually makes a very good point.

Please don't be town after making a vote like this. Please, please, please don't be town after making a vote like this.
Please.
The situation Papa Zito came up with is a possible situation, yes. Is it more likely than me skimming the rules? Not by much, if at all. This means that driving a wagon on me to lynch because of said scumslip without me having the chance to form reads, without me getting the chance to get properly invested in the game: this shoots town in the foot especially since once I flip town, this town is going to go back on the fucked up road of apathy and lazily lynching people they can't read once again. This completely takes away the potential for anything that I could possibly do for town: which, considering that I A) haven't slipped inside information only scum would know (this is a real scumslip, by the way), and B) haven't involved myself in a situation that would be far more likely coming from scum-me than town me, means that you're sucking away the majority of anything good I could possibly accomplish in this game because of an incredibly dumb argument.
You're better than this. Other people on this wagon might not be, but you're better than this.

[Nachomamma8]

After you did in-thread.

I can do this all day.

GGscum.

I know you can: you have no filter in your brain telling you that what you're saying lacks logic.
Notice how you're not addressing any of the content I'm producing in the meantime, and notice how the content I'm producing at L-1 with 20 hours left already blows your content out of the water.

[Nachomamma8]

And while I'm posting before I have to leave for work, no less!
A normal person would go "hmm, maybe the wagon I'm pushing really IS stupid", but AGar keeps on plugging.

[Nachomamma8]

Or... I skimmed the first page when looking up how to veto and grabbed it from mafia veto.
Why is this unreasonable?

This is what I was hoping you would respond to, Iec.

[Iecerint]

If you do ctrl + f veto, you'll find the town one first.

Also, you would have mentioned this earlier -- for example, prior to MuffinMan saying that he would think you plausibly town for giving exactly that explanation.

[AGar]

After you did in-thread.

I can do this all day.

GGscum.

I know you can: you have no filter in your brain telling you that what you're saying lacks logic.
Notice how you're not addressing any of the content I'm producing in the meantime, and notice how the content I'm producing at L-1 with 20 hours left already blows your content out of the water.

I'm not addressing it because you're scum. I'll admit, you're handling this better than I would. My solution when I slipped was just not to post in the thread for 24 hours until I either died or something else happened.
The content you're "producing" at L-1 with 20 hours left consists of "TIP is town because meta." and threatening that town is going to regret lynching you.
I somehow don't think we will.

P-Edit: Oh god, posting before work! So am I confirmed town, too?

[Nachomamma8]

I didn't control + f veto.

[AGar]

Aaaand you also ignored my first point which is the more damning one.

Many content. Such town. Wow.

[Nachomamma8]

I scrolled down and looked for veto.

[Iecerint]

It's so sad because I love you Nacho.

But I'll still see you next week!

This isn't goodbye forever!

[AGar]

TOWN VETO IS FIRST AND IN BOLD.