That was pre-re-read. I upgraded my vote from temporary to permanentish in [1314].MBL wrote:CES is there "for the moment"
Also, MBL, you're short 8%(the percentages should add up to 200 as we have 2 scum, not 1.92).
That was pre-re-read. I upgraded my vote from temporary to permanentish in [1314].MBL wrote:CES is there "for the moment"
I agree it in and of itself is not statistically significant, but it's something I noticed. I don't feel like parsing through lots of old games looking for concrete examples, itCogito Ergo Sum wrote:One incidence is not statistically significant as I'm sure there have been lots of people who have done this.
ItCogito Ergo Sum wrote:Pointing out Channel did it does not support the hypothesis that it is a scum tell, but what does it do is link me to Channel in the mind of the reader.
Yes, your playstyle is different, but that doesn't mean you can't exhibitCogito Ergo Sum wrote:Also, my playstyle is wholly unlike Channel's. Even if Channel's actions were significant, blindly applying that to me is still wrong, painfully wrong.
I don't think you need to include an example at all. You can just explain why scum do it more often than town. Or you can say something like "in my experience".Thesp wrote:I agree it in and of itself is not statistically significant, but it's something I noticed. I don't feel like parsing through lots of old games looking for concrete examples, it feels like something I've seen scum do more than town, and it feels like something I would expect to see more from scum than town (i.e. I find it significantly less likely to be something town would do than scum from a behavioral standpoint).
It's not the nature of my playstyle that matters here, but rather merely the fact that it differs from Channel's. What is a scum tell for one, might be a town tell for another. Do you think I would be more likely to do it as scum or as town? Again, Channel doesn't enter into the equation.Thesp wrote:It's this particular argument, that you always play bizarre and different, that makes me feel you're skating by without anyone giving you serious attention.
Why do you think Nightfall is scum? MBL calls my actions illogical, but I find Ether scummier than Nightfall by a horse's length. (Yes, I'm probably action illogical, you would too if the only viable bandwagons were on people you had on the innocent or probably innocent list.)Glork wrote:Thesp, you should seriously vote for Nightfall.
MBL, I'd like to hear a response to my most recent post. I'd also like you to drop the hammer on your scumbuddy Nightfall.
Will this be instead of our lynch choice or in addition to our lynch?Stoofer wrote:Deadline still in place for the time being.
In the absence of a substantive post/groveling apology/huge bribe, Zindaras will be modkilled at deadline
It was more of a "If you happen to be town, I hope you take this to heart" type post. CES somewhat said that if I turn up town, my expressed thoughts would not influence his. I find that in itself a little scummy and so I said that if he is town then I hope he and everyone else does take what I said into consideration.Patrick wrote: Nightfall's post 1330 seems to be adressing CES as though he thinks or knows that CES is town, whereas two posts before he said that CES was a grave concern of his.
Nightfall's recent posts feel very genuine to me.Glork wrote:Thesp, are you Nightfall's godfather?
Apparently, I thought it would be worthwhile. You'll have to forgive me for not posting as you'd like.Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:I don't think you need to include an example at all. You can just explain why scum do it more often than town. Or you can say something like "in my experience".
I'm not sure I need to independently assess each and every single player to the extent you are demanding here. Each player requires their individual assessmentCogito Ergo Sum wrote:It's not the nature of my playstyle that matters here, but rather merely the fact that it differs from Channel's. What is a scum tell for one, might be a town tell for another. Do you think I would be more likely to do it as scum or as town? Again, Channel doesn't enter into the equation.
I'm not seeing this at all.Patrick wrote:Nightfall's post 1330 seems to be adressing CES as though he thinks or knows that CES is town, whereas two posts before he said that CES was a grave concern of his.
Been there, buddy.Mgm wrote:(Yes, I'm probably action illogical, you would too if the only viable bandwagons were on people you had on the innocent or probably innocent list.)
For the record, I'm a big believer in this technique. I find it interesting that after eliminating myself and Glork from your "a-townie" list, we are left with what I see as a very viable scumpair, CES/Zindaras. It is not lost upon me that you yourself are one of the people I've pondered as scum.MrBuddyLee wrote:For filler, I'll state that one way I approach scumhunting is to look for posts that I don't think scum could make. They're pretty rare, but once in a while I spot a post that simply reeks of genuine.
Patrick, Nightfall, Ether and MgM have made such posts in this game. I haven't gone back to pick out the specific posts and don't really care to, but I made mental notes as such at the time. I just wanted to state for the record that if any one of them is scum, they had a moment of genius at one point and completely and utterly bamboozled me.
Thesp, Glork, CES, and especially Zindaras, no such vibes from any of their posts. Glork came close once or twice but he's a good enough player that I hold him to a higher standard when looking for sincerity in his words.
disclaimer: this technique isn't by any means 100% successful but it's worked more often than not.
Wrong. I should be treated differently because I am different. So is Glrok. This is not about my playstyle, something I stated explicitly. Scum tells are only useful if you know how to apply them. It's about understanding and insight, not about rules.Thesp wrote:Again, I have serious problems with this argument (whether voiced, as here, or implicit) that you should be treated different because you're CRAAAAAAAAAAZYYYYYYYYY!!!!
My response to Ether's analysis contains the more concrete reasons for my vote. Why would you even consider adding an example in this case? What would it add?Thesp wrote:Also, why are you voting for Nightfall? I missed that part. You've glossed over this while showing "activity" by attacking me. This reminds me of an instance where another player, who was scum...nevermind, you don't want to hear it.
Personally I think I have a fairly good read on Zindie, so I see no reason to no lynch. I'd say it mostly means that we don't have to sacrifice info for a lynch at this time. I'd like a Nightfall lynch, obv, but there's no need to blindly put votes on near deadline.Patrick wrote:It's worth asking whether we should lynch Nightfall or not, with Zindaras getting modkilled at deadline. Would it be best to find out Zindaras's alignment before killing anyone else? Or do we want to double lynch today?
I think I do have a better-than-average understanding and insight of scum tells and application thereof. I recognize I may be wrong in this.Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Scum tells are only useful if you know how to apply them. It's about understanding and insight, not about rules.
Indeed. Who wants deadlines.Stoofer wrote:Interesting fact: This is now the second-longest Normal Game ever; and likely to overtake the longest (Mafia 49: SpeedyKQ's Big New York) before it ends. However, Mafia 58: Ready Salted is nearly as big and has a long way to go, so that may end up the biggest. I wonder what how long this game would be if I had never imposed any deadlines?