No most of my interaction with B_E there ended up just being for my own entertainment
whatIn post 547, The Betting Pool wrote:I could be mistaken but this alliteration game is not the first N ran with this theme, hence the title. Why not look to see if he used the sample role PM as an actual role before. If he hasn't, hammer it like your Thor. If he has, perhaps further discussion is needed and then we hammer anyway.
image saved thank
How many times do I have to say this? I think B_E is being fairly scummy. I think SK/Dunham were being scummier. To me is sounds like SK is scum going after an easy lynch with halfassed reads or scum bussing their partner because their partner is an easy lynch and good for town cred. There is a good amount of gut in there too. I don't know if SK is being full out scummy to this point, but at best he's null for me and Dunham came across as scum to me.In post 522, Jargonaut wrote:That doesn't explain away all his behavior. I previously mentioned that he never went anywhere with his Riptide case, or even explained it. Why would a town BE do that?In post 520, BipolarChemist wrote:TL;DR Think of B_E as a child and most things he does make a hell of a lot more sense.
Ah, I got it. I took your post a different way but that makes sense.In post 517, Riptide wrote:Okay, so BE originally called me out because he said we waited for other people to vote Cho before voting for her, which in fact is absolute bull crap. If you look at the timing of our posts of our interactions with Cho, there were no votes added to her until from the moment we engaged her to the moment we voted her. The reason we say he should've said something about that post is because the way you worded it, it sounded like you could have been waiting to see how the wagon was going before actually voting (at the very least, you were waiting on Cho to defend herself). If you read the wording of our post, it was not "Look at Tool! He did it too!" it was more like, "By your logic, shouldn't you have called Tool out as well?". One benefit from posting this was the reactions that came from it. We gave BE some town points for calling you out on your post and not just straight up tunneling, but lost town points when he tried to call us out on a deflection that wasn't there.
At this point, BE is just trying to fabricate reasoning on us that's not even there.
I know your vote isn't on that slot anymore but I still feel like it could be useful in the future so I'll ask anyway. Lucky, could you elaborate on why you thought Dunhamganger looked scummy?In post 458, The Betting Pool wrote:tool, explanation for the vote, Lucky thought Dunhamganger looked like scum. I disagreed, but since I didn't have a strong scum read of my own I was all right leaving our vote there. Now I do, and I even got us synched up on it for now.
YeahIn post 555, BipolarChemist wrote:To me is sounds like SK is scum going after an easy lynch with halfassed reads or scum bussing their partner because their partner is an easy lynch and good for town cred.
But you just said that that was him being himselfIn post 555, BipolarChemist wrote:The inherent laziness coming from him feels like scum being at a loss for posting real opinions, and results in the obnoxious but not saying anything posts.
Yes there is plenty to say likeIn post 560, BipolarChemist wrote:Is there much to say about the first part? I mean, I have my opinion on the matter, but I doubt this is gonna change the course of today.
In post 290, N wrote:Elyse has died night 1.
She wasan Auxiliary Aid, Jack of All Trades, aligned withthe Angels.You arean Auxiliary Aid.
Each night, you may use one of the following abilities. You may use each one only once and cannot use more than one per night.
Yes.In post 564, SleepyKrew wrote:Oh been forgetting to ask thisIn post 290, N wrote:Elyse has died night 1.
She wasan Auxiliary Aid, Jack of All Trades, aligned withthe Angels.You arean Auxiliary Aid.
Each night, you may use one of the following abilities. You may use each one only once and cannot use more than one per night.
Would Accident Aversion block a factional kill?
Curiosity though it certainly could be relevant in the futureIn post 566, Jargonaut wrote:Was that just curiosity or did you think it might be relevant?
uh, do you think BPC is scum?In post 562, SleepyKrew wrote:Yes there is plenty to say likeIn post 560, BipolarChemist wrote:Is there much to say about the first part? I mean, I have my opinion on the matter, but I doubt this is gonna change the course of today.
"oh holy shit maybe it turns out I'm the one conf-biasing not SleepyKrew
seeing as I, BelgianChemist, just did the literal definition of conf-biasing"
Your continued resistance is noted
It's going in mynotes
I'm not bothering developing a read because why do it now?
