Micro 333 -- Medical Mafia ~~Game Over~~

CooLDoG · Post Post #125 (ISO) » Wed May 07, 2014 4:21 am

Oh forgot. With a lynch coming up so early it is highly unlikely that the target is town because of all of the inactivity. With that said though, there was not a lynch, so it would be unfair to speculate.

tl;dr scum don't like fast, early lynches.

Chuck_Norris · Post Post #126 (ISO) » Wed May 07, 2014 8:09 am

@CoolDog
I'm still not understanding you. In post 124 you say that scum will most definitely be on a quick lynch. No qualifiers. But now in post 125 you claim that scum don't like fast early lynches. You claim scum don't like fast early lynches because it is highly unlikely the quick lynch target will be Town. If a fast early lynch is on scum, why would scum already be on the wagon? That makes no sense to me. I understand busing. I know how it works. But I don't see why a fast early lynch in any way points to an absolute certainty that busing is involved. In fact, in the scenario where a fast early lynch results in a scum flip I would be far more interested in looking at the people who were not on the scum wagon. Do you disagree?

Venmar · Post Post #127 (ISO) » Wed May 07, 2014 8:31 am

In post 117, tn5421 wrote:I don't recall if you were voting me for a particular reason or if it was just RVS.

BearClaw · Post Post #128 (ISO) » Wed May 07, 2014 8:32 am

In post 127, Venmar wrote:
In post 117, tn5421 wrote:I don't recall if you were voting me for a particular reason or if it was just RVS.

Umm...

Mine?

tn5421 · Post Post #129 (ISO) » Wed May 07, 2014 9:47 am

In post 127, Venmar wrote:
In post 117, tn5421 wrote:I don't recall if you were voting me for a particular reason or if it was just RVS.

Are you actually going to answer me or are you going to continue to pretend to have a post restriction?

BearClaw · Post Post #130 (ISO) » Wed May 07, 2014 3:10 pm

I don't know if I should, perhaps if you began to actually read the game you'd know why, Mr.Scum?

RachMarie · Post Post #131 (ISO) » Wed May 07, 2014 4:53 pm

Ven there are no post restrictions in Medical Mafia

So could you please post something other than pictures, please and thank you.

BearClaw · Post Post #132 (ISO) » Wed May 07, 2014 5:44 pm

Wuh... I never said I had one....wha.....

Is this real life?

Am I dreaming?

RachMarie · Post Post #133 (ISO) » Wed May 07, 2014 7:46 pm

Not you Bear, I was talking to Venmar and his posting a pic and a quote.

tn5421 · Post Post #134 (ISO) » Wed May 07, 2014 10:14 pm

In post 130, BearClaw wrote:I don't know if I should, perhaps if you began to actually read the game you'd know why, Mr.Scum?

Have fun scumpainting me, mister logical fallacy guy.

Chuck_Norris · Post Post #135 (ISO) » Wed May 07, 2014 11:09 pm

@BearClaw
Why not simply direct tn to post 99 instead of being Mr. Unhelpful? Do you think your case on him is improved by proving that he missed the reason you are voting him?

@tn5421
Where is BearClaw's logical fallacy? What type of logical fallacy are you accusing him of, ad hominem? Has anyone else in this game presented a logical fallacy [eg. cum hoc ergo propter hoc, causal oversimplification, or post hoc ergo propter hoc perhaps]?

Nobody Special · Post Post #136 (ISO) » Thu May 08, 2014 12:19 am

Searching for a replacement for saturnine.

Nobody Special · Post Post #137 (ISO) » Thu May 08, 2014 12:30 am

Votecount 1.05

(unchanged)

Ninja Trigger - 3 - RachMarie, ZZZX, Not_Mafia
CooLDoG - 2 - tn5421, Chuck_Norris
Not_Mafia - 2 - CooLDoG, Ninja Trigger
tn5421 - 1 - BearClaw

Not Voting: saturnine

With 9 alive it takes 5 to lynch.

Deadline: (expired on 2014-05-23 04:02:11)

tn5421 · Post Post #138 (ISO) » Thu May 08, 2014 1:57 am

In post 135, Chuck_Norris wrote:@BearClaw
Why not simply direct tn to post 99 instead of being Mr. Unhelpful? Do you think your case on him is improved by proving that he missed the reason you are voting him?

@tn5421
Where is BearClaw's logical fallacy? What type of logical fallacy are you accusing him of, ad hominem? Has anyone else in this game presented a logical fallacy [eg. cum hoc ergo propter hoc, causal oversimplification, or post hoc ergo propter hoc perhaps]?

His mild ad hominem. He called me Mr. Scum. So I poked some fun back.

CooLDoG · Post Post #139 (ISO) » Thu May 08, 2014 4:31 am

@chuck, I have explained my logic, re-read my posts the answers are there.

ZZZX · Post Post #140 (ISO) » Thu May 08, 2014 5:17 am

This is interesting. I will post reads when I am home.

tn5421 · Post Post #141 (ISO) » Thu May 08, 2014 6:07 am

In post 139, CooLDoG wrote:@chuck, I have explained my logic, re-read my posts the answers are there.

Don't give him an excuse to pretend he doesn't understand. Link the relevant posts.

ZZZX · Post Post #142 (ISO) » Thu May 08, 2014 9:01 am

@MOD URGENT V/LA for 2 days

Not_Mafia · Post Post #143 (ISO) » Thu May 08, 2014 9:09 am

What do you call a bear in the rain?

Not_Mafia · Post Post #144 (ISO) » Thu May 08, 2014 9:09 am

What do you call a bear in the rain?

Chuck_Norris · Post Post #145 (ISO) » Thu May 08, 2014 9:14 am

@CoolDog
Did you see post 126? Do you understand why your previous explanation actually makes me more confused? If I were comfortable with your explanation I'd be looking elsewhere. I don't intend for this to be a tunnel but I really would appreciate some clarity.

@tn
Are you trying to provoke an argument? Also, you accused BearClaw of a mild ad hom attack then use one one me? Gooses and ganders. Or am I misinterpreting that and you're actually slyly egging CoolDog?

PE:

A drizzly bear?

tn5421 · Post Post #146 (ISO) » Thu May 08, 2014 12:20 pm

I want CooLDoG to show what he's talking about.

Nobody Special · Post Post #147 (ISO) » Thu May 08, 2014 12:47 pm

Ninja Trigger has been prodded.

RachMarie · Post Post #148 (ISO) » Thu May 08, 2014 5:48 pm

Puns? I love puns.

RachMarie · Post Post #149 (ISO) » Thu May 08, 2014 5:50 pm

Wait a minute Ven is not playing in this game WTF? Why did he post?