Mini 1568: Another Awesome Alliteration Adventure (over)


User avatar
Burning_Earth
Burning_Earth
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Burning_Earth
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1589
Joined: January 26, 2014

Post Post #525 (ISO) » Tue May 06, 2014 8:10 pm

Post by Burning_Earth »

In post 519, BipolarChemist wrote:
In post 465, SleepyKrew wrote:
In post 275, Burning_Earth wrote:Putting on my flip-flops

UNVOTE: VOTE: cho
Terrible vote
Not that voting Cho is itself bad. But the way he did it. Ugh
What way? His immature, cocky way? Have you seen this kid before?
In post 276, Burning_Earth wrote:
In post 254, Cho wrote:Didn't see the end of last page. I'll respond to Rubicon whenever I get back online. Busy day.

Oh, and I'm also debating whether or not I should vote Riptide. Partially because I'm kind of tired of their misrepresentative attacks on me, partially because it's the biggest wagon besides mine. Any thoughts? Would you call me out as scummy for being survivalistic, or are Town not allowed to want to avoid guaranteed mislynches?

Bye.
:(
BRILLIANT EXPLANATION
(why is he explaining
after
the vote anyway?)
Because he's a dumbass.
In post 281, Burning_Earth wrote:That'll teach me to be checking VCs!
so forced
Seems that way because he's a dumbass.
within one minute of the previous post
the force is strong with this one
Image
I don't expect scum to react like he did. He passed it off as oh oops, my bad. Ignorant and dumb, ya, but I don't think it's scummy.
In post 292, Burning_Earth wrote:I'm town pinky promise

(DISCLAIMER: THE CORRECT PLAY IS PROBABLY TO LYNCH ME)
Proper town attitude would be "I fucked up. I'll try to do what I can before I'm lynched."
Think about how you would expect scum to react too. Same point as above.
In post 370, Burning_Earth wrote:
I have removed his "case" from this quote to save space

My case on riptide.

Riptide attacked cho without voting her until other people had.

Another masterpiece from B_E cases TM
Another masterpiece indeed. Looks like someone trying to make some noise and hoping nobody hears what they're actually saying
I see the opposite here, looks like he's just failing at trying to get attention.
In post 374, Burning_Earth wrote:Oh this is your elyse case

All the links are fucked up
I don't think he ever explained the underlined part
He hasn't explained a whole hell of a lot, which is one reason I think he's scummy. You're right here. I kinda took his link thing as more him being a dummy.
In post 401, Burning_Earth wrote:meh. I still don't see a better wagon.

Dunham wagon is shit. (1)
B_E wagon is shit
. You'd think I'd have more reads in 17 pages, but (2)
I'm not really invested in this game.
1. Again, not how town that knows they should die would play. They'd be trying to be as useful as possible.
2. Bullshit. He was actually pushing Riptide until the heat on himself got turned up.
I think B_E generally plays a very selfish game. Both of the points you made point exactly to this.

Sorry for the quote wall. Overall, SK, your argument, to me, feels like something put together without much previous thought. I'm not sure you outwardly called him fully scummy very much here, yet you had such a strong scumread.

Anyways, I'm tired, I'm going to eat and pass out soon. Good night!
I love you BPC!
User avatar
Burning_Earth
Burning_Earth
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Burning_Earth
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1589
Joined: January 26, 2014

Post Post #526 (ISO) » Tue May 06, 2014 8:11 pm

Post by Burning_Earth »

In post 513, SleepyKrew wrote:You seem to be thinking I did:
1. Determined B_E was scum/voted him
2. Read the game
3. Thought of why he was scum
4. Wrote the case

What actually happened:
1. Read the game
2. Thought he was scummy and looked deeper into it
3. Determined he's scum/voted him
4. Wrote the case
5. Had some fried chicken and mashed potatoes

You seem to be tunneling on me? Is that confirmation bias? Or is what you're doing not tunneling?


Also
In post 490, BipolarChemist wrote:B_E just feels like lynch bait to me, an easy lynch without much thought because he's done basically nothing except for a dumb ass quick hammer. I think even my own scum read on him might be more based on that he's an easy lynch target and someone who isn't helpful rather than scummy.

@TSO: I agree that scum would normally give reasoning, where someone giving no reason feels more town, but dunham didn't seem to give a shit either. I think his no reasoning might just be null.
In post 491, BipolarChemist wrote:Okay did feel kinda scummy (passive aggressive?).
In post 492, BipolarChemist wrote:I'm not a fan of SleepyKrew analysis of B_E, it feels forced and like he's got a bit of confirmation bias going on.
How much time does it take to make a waffle? 4 minutes
I agree with this post except for the bit in which I'm apparently scum
User avatar
Burning_Earth
Burning_Earth
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Burning_Earth
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1589
Joined: January 26, 2014

Post Post #527 (ISO) » Tue May 06, 2014 8:13 pm

Post by Burning_Earth »

In post 525, Burning_Earth wrote:
In post 519, BipolarChemist wrote:
In post 465, SleepyKrew wrote:
In post 275, Burning_Earth wrote:Putting on my flip-flops

UNVOTE: VOTE: cho
Terrible vote
Not that voting Cho is itself bad. But the way he did it. Ugh
What way? His immature, cocky way? Have you seen this kid before?
In post 276, Burning_Earth wrote:
In post 254, Cho wrote:Didn't see the end of last page. I'll respond to Rubicon whenever I get back online. Busy day.

Oh, and I'm also debating whether or not I should vote Riptide. Partially because I'm kind of tired of their misrepresentative attacks on me, partially because it's the biggest wagon besides mine. Any thoughts? Would you call me out as scummy for being survivalistic, or are Town not allowed to want to avoid guaranteed mislynches?

Bye.
:(
BRILLIANT EXPLANATION
(why is he explaining
after
the vote anyway?)
Because he's a dumbass.
In post 281, Burning_Earth wrote:That'll teach me to be checking VCs!
so forced
Seems that way because he's a dumbass.
within one minute of the previous post
the force is strong with this one
Image
I don't expect scum to react like he did. He passed it off as oh oops, my bad. Ignorant and dumb, ya, but I don't think it's scummy.
In post 292, Burning_Earth wrote:I'm town pinky promise

(DISCLAIMER: THE CORRECT PLAY IS PROBABLY TO LYNCH ME)
Proper town attitude would be "I fucked up. I'll try to do what I can before I'm lynched."
Think about how you would expect scum to react too. Same point as above.
In post 370, Burning_Earth wrote:
I have removed his "case" from this quote to save space

My case on riptide.

Riptide attacked cho without voting her until other people had.

Another masterpiece from B_E cases TM
Another masterpiece indeed. Looks like someone trying to make some noise and hoping nobody hears what they're actually saying
I see the opposite here, looks like he's just failing at trying to get attention.
In post 374, Burning_Earth wrote:Oh this is your elyse case

All the links are fucked up
I don't think he ever explained the underlined part
He hasn't explained a whole hell of a lot, which is one reason I think he's scummy. You're right here. I kinda took his link thing as more him being a dummy.
In post 401, Burning_Earth wrote:meh. I still don't see a better wagon.

Dunham wagon is shit. (1)
B_E wagon is shit
. You'd think I'd have more reads in 17 pages, but (2)
I'm not really invested in this game.
1. Again, not how town that knows they should die would play. They'd be trying to be as useful as possible.
2. Bullshit. He was actually pushing Riptide until the heat on himself got turned up.
I think B_E generally plays a very selfish game. Both of the points you made point exactly to this.

Sorry for the quote wall. Overall, SK, your argument, to me, feels like something put together without much previous thought. I'm not sure you outwardly called him fully scummy very much here, yet you had such a strong scumread.

Anyways, I'm tired, I'm going to eat and pass out soon. Good night!
I love you BPC!
Your post is bad though. You defend me although heaps while still having a scum read on me.
User avatar
Burning_Earth
Burning_Earth
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Burning_Earth
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1589
Joined: January 26, 2014

Post Post #528 (ISO) » Tue May 06, 2014 8:14 pm

Post by Burning_Earth »

In post 511, Riptide wrote:Okay, well, uh, dice and I are working on something pertaining to B_E, but Sleepy already said my part of the post... So...
BPC- Would you care to show us what posts he made that lead you to think he's town and explain why they do, please.
-HS
I'd still like to see this please.
User avatar
SleepyKrew
SleepyKrew
he/him
Snark Attack
User avatar
User avatar
SleepyKrew
he/him
Snark Attack
Snark Attack
Posts: 15746
Joined: April 27, 2011
Pronoun: he/him
Location: quack

Post Post #529 (ISO) » Tue May 06, 2014 8:15 pm

Post by SleepyKrew »

Why have you not claimed
To be clear: quack
User avatar
SleepyKrew
SleepyKrew
he/him
Snark Attack
User avatar
User avatar
SleepyKrew
he/him
Snark Attack
Snark Attack
Posts: 15746
Joined: April 27, 2011
Pronoun: he/him
Location: quack

Post Post #530 (ISO) » Tue May 06, 2014 8:24 pm

Post by SleepyKrew »

Of note: Egg is the only player to not have expressed a scumread on Burning
Though BPC's is waffley syrupy goodness
To be clear: quack
User avatar
Burning_Earth
Burning_Earth
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Burning_Earth
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1589
Joined: January 26, 2014

Post Post #531 (ISO) » Tue May 06, 2014 8:27 pm

Post by Burning_Earth »

In post 465, SleepyKrew wrote:
In post 275, Burning_Earth wrote:Putting on my flip-flops

UNVOTE: VOTE: cho
Terrible vote
Not that voting Cho is itself bad. But the way he did it. Ugh
Would you think this if it wasn't a hammer?
In post 276, Burning_Earth wrote:
In post 254, Cho wrote:Didn't see the end of last page. I'll respond to Rubicon whenever I get back online. Busy day.

Oh, and I'm also debating whether or not I should vote Riptide. Partially because I'm kind of tired of their misrepresentative attacks on me, partially because it's the biggest wagon besides mine. Any thoughts? Would you call me out as scummy for being survivalistic, or are Town not allowed to want to avoid guaranteed mislynches?

Bye.
:(
BRILLIANT EXPLANATION
(why is he explaining
after
the vote anyway?)
In post 281, Burning_Earth wrote:That'll teach me to be checking VCs!
so forced
within one minute of the previous post
the force is strong with this one
Image

I like to spout verbal diarrhoea. It's fun for me
In [url=http://www.MafiaScum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=5853483#p5853483]post 292[/url], Burning_Earth wrote:I'm town pinky promise

(DISCLAIMER: THE CORRECT PLAY IS PROBABLY TO LYNCH ME)
Proper town attitude would be "I fucked up. I'll try to do what I can before I'm lynched."
Maybe.

I'm always looking for ways to improve my town game, thanks for offering that comment


In post 295, Burning_Earth wrote:she made some really bad posts. See 254.
:lol:
In post 370, Burning_Earth wrote:
I have removed his "case" from this quote to save space

My case on riptide.

Riptide attacked cho without voting her until other people had.

Another masterpiece from B_E cases TM
Another masterpiece indeed. Looks like someone trying to make some noise and hoping nobody hears what they're actually saying
Image

That unfunny image does not make you right.

That isn't all my points. I hate cases, so when asked to make a case... I DONT WANNA! I DONT THINK SO!

In post 374, Burning_Earth wrote:Oh this is your elyse case

All the links are fucked up
I don't think he ever explained the underlined part
Image

So... My iPad is shit. Fuck, I'm scum, you got me.

In post 401, Burning_Earth wrote:meh. I still don't see a better wagon.

Dunham wagon is shit. (1)
B_E wagon is shit
. You'd think I'd have more reads in 17 pages, but (2)
I'm not really invested in this game.
1. Again, not how town that knows they should die would play. They'd be trying to be as useful as possible.
2. Bullshit. He was actually pushing Riptide until the heat on himself got turned up.

1. But I don't wanna die!
2. If I was really invested in this game, then I would be posting more and reading more
In post 460, Burning_Earth wrote:Hi guys.

I get that my quick hammering was bad, but seriously.

As scum, would I do that?
:Lol:

Two can play at that game.

Lololololololol ignore ignore ignore
User avatar
Burning_Earth
Burning_Earth
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Burning_Earth
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1589
Joined: January 26, 2014

Post Post #532 (ISO) » Tue May 06, 2014 8:28 pm

Post by Burning_Earth »

In post 530, SleepyKrew wrote:Of note: Egg is the only player to not have expressed a scumread on Burning
Though BPC's is waffley syrupy goodness
Note: logical fallacy

Claim: VT
User avatar
N
N
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
N
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8539
Joined: August 2, 2012

Post Post #533 (ISO) » Tue May 06, 2014 8:29 pm

Post by N »

antiar
noun
the upas tree.

Vote Count 2.09
toolenduso
(0)
The Betting Pool
(0)
Rubicon
(1) Riptide
BipolarChemist
(0)
Jargonaut
(0)
SleepyKrew
(3) Egg, Rubicon, BipolarChemist
MTD
(0)
T S O
(0)
Riptide
(1) Burning_Earth
Burning_Earth
(5)
toolenduso, MTD, SleepyKrew, The Betting Pool, Jargonaut
Egg
(0)

Not Voting
(1) T S O

With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

Deadline is in
(expired on 2014-05-11 23:11:32)
.
GTKAS

Share And Enjoy
(go stick your head in a pig)
User avatar
SleepyKrew
SleepyKrew
he/him
Snark Attack
User avatar
User avatar
SleepyKrew
he/him
Snark Attack
Snark Attack
Posts: 15746
Joined: April 27, 2011
Pronoun: he/him
Location: quack

Post Post #534 (ISO) » Tue May 06, 2014 8:30 pm

Post by SleepyKrew »

In post 532, Burning_Earth wrote:
In post 530, SleepyKrew wrote:Of note: Egg is the only player to not have expressed a scumread on Burning
Though BPC's is waffley syrupy goodness
Note: logical fallacy

Claim: VT
What's the fallacy and what's your rolename
To be clear: quack
User avatar
Burning_Earth
Burning_Earth
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Burning_Earth
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1589
Joined: January 26, 2014

Post Post #535 (ISO) » Tue May 06, 2014 8:31 pm

Post by Burning_Earth »

Fallacy: popularity doesn't mean correctness

Role name: uh, it's in the OP, so don't know what tell you're trying to extract from me here. Average Anybody.
User avatar
SleepyKrew
SleepyKrew
he/him
Snark Attack
User avatar
User avatar
SleepyKrew
he/him
Snark Attack
Snark Attack
Posts: 15746
Joined: April 27, 2011
Pronoun: he/him
Location: quack

Post Post #536 (ISO) » Tue May 06, 2014 8:33 pm

Post by SleepyKrew »

In post 535, Burning_Earth wrote:Fallacy: popularity doesn't mean correctness

Role name: uh, it's in the OP, so don't know what tell you're trying to extract from me here. Average Anybody.
I wasn't implying anything. I was stating facts for my own potential future use as well as that of anyone else.

So then why didn't you say that at first?
But no you didn't do what I was hoping you'd do
Oh well
To be clear: quack
User avatar
Burning_Earth
Burning_Earth
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Burning_Earth
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1589
Joined: January 26, 2014

Post Post #537 (ISO) » Tue May 06, 2014 8:38 pm

Post by Burning_Earth »

So, what was the purpose of asking me to state my role name again?

Also, what was I hoping for you to do? I'm quite interested, as you are apparently a master of the subconscious mind.
User avatar
SleepyKrew
SleepyKrew
he/him
Snark Attack
User avatar
User avatar
SleepyKrew
he/him
Snark Attack
Snark Attack
Posts: 15746
Joined: April 27, 2011
Pronoun: he/him
Location: quack

Post Post #538 (ISO) » Tue May 06, 2014 8:44 pm

Post by SleepyKrew »

In post 537, Burning_Earth wrote:So, what was the purpose of asking me to state my role name again?
Because you hadn't stated it in the first place
In post 537, Burning_Earth wrote:Also, what was I hoping for you to do? I'm quite interested, as you are apparently a master of the subconscious mind.
My goal was to get you to mix the two of us up.
Mission Accomplished
SleepyKrew out
peace love and hammers

Image
To be clear: quack
User avatar
Burning_Earth
Burning_Earth
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Burning_Earth
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1589
Joined: January 26, 2014

Post Post #539 (ISO) » Tue May 06, 2014 8:48 pm

Post by Burning_Earth »

Wut and... Wut?
User avatar
MTD
MTD
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
MTD
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2033
Joined: November 27, 2013

Post Post #540 (ISO) » Tue May 06, 2014 11:06 pm

Post by MTD »

Uh, what?
still the same old MTD
User avatar
SleepyKrew
SleepyKrew
he/him
Snark Attack
User avatar
User avatar
SleepyKrew
he/him
Snark Attack
Snark Attack
Posts: 15746
Joined: April 27, 2011
Pronoun: he/him
Location: quack

Post Post #541 (ISO) » Tue May 06, 2014 11:34 pm

Post by SleepyKrew »

In post 540, MTD wrote:Uh, what?
Can I help you?
To be clear: quack
User avatar
SleepyKrew
SleepyKrew
he/him
Snark Attack
User avatar
User avatar
SleepyKrew
he/him
Snark Attack
Snark Attack
Posts: 15746
Joined: April 27, 2011
Pronoun: he/him
Location: quack

Post Post #542 (ISO) » Tue May 06, 2014 11:35 pm

Post by SleepyKrew »

(or are you "what"ing at B_E?)
To be clear: quack
User avatar
MTD
MTD
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
MTD
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2033
Joined: November 27, 2013

Post Post #543 (ISO) » Tue May 06, 2014 11:51 pm

Post by MTD »

In post 538, SleepyKrew wrote:My goal was to get you to mix the two of us up.
I was "what"ing at this. I don't understand.
still the same old MTD
User avatar
SleepyKrew
SleepyKrew
he/him
Snark Attack
User avatar
User avatar
SleepyKrew
he/him
Snark Attack
Snark Attack
Posts: 15746
Joined: April 27, 2011
Pronoun: he/him
Location: quack

Post Post #544 (ISO) » Wed May 07, 2014 12:06 am

Post by SleepyKrew »

Reread the question on the second line of 537 ;)
To be clear: quack
User avatar
MTD
MTD
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
MTD
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2033
Joined: November 27, 2013

Post Post #545 (ISO) » Wed May 07, 2014 1:59 am

Post by MTD »

In post 544, SleepyKrew wrote:Reread the question on the second line of 537 ;)
Ah, okay, so that doesn't really matter, does it?
still the same old MTD
User avatar
Egg
Egg
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Egg
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5426
Joined: December 16, 2010

Post Post #546 (ISO) » Wed May 07, 2014 2:52 am

Post by Egg »

Eh, I might be wrong. Burning just beetlejuiced and then referred to the sample PM. Maybe he is scum. Whatever, we'll probably find out soon.
User avatar
The Betting Pool
The Betting Pool
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
The Betting Pool
Goon
Goon
Posts: 470
Joined: January 7, 2014

Post Post #547 (ISO) » Wed May 07, 2014 3:05 am

Post by The Betting Pool »

I could be mistaken but this alliteration game is not the first N ran with this theme, hence the title. Why not look to see if he used the sample role PM as an actual role before. If he hasn't, hammer it like your Thor. If he has, perhaps further discussion is needed and then we hammer anyway.
User avatar
The Betting Pool
The Betting Pool
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
The Betting Pool
Goon
Goon
Posts: 470
Joined: January 7, 2014

Post Post #548 (ISO) » Wed May 07, 2014 3:05 am

Post by The Betting Pool »

I'm mobile posting, or I'd do it myself.

-Lucky btw.
User avatar
toolenduso
toolenduso
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
toolenduso
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2594
Joined: April 10, 2007

Post Post #549 (ISO) » Wed May 07, 2014 4:16 am

Post by toolenduso »

In post 547, The Betting Pool wrote:
Why not look to see if he used the sample role PM as an actual role before.
Image
In post 525, Burning_Earth wrote:I love you BPC!
In post 527, Burning_Earth wrote:Your post is bad though. You defend me although heaps while still having a scum read on me.
Spoiler: Post 531
In post 531, Burning_Earth wrote:
In post 465, SleepyKrew wrote:
In post 275, Burning_Earth wrote:Putting on my flip-flops

UNVOTE: VOTE: cho
Terrible vote
Not that voting Cho is itself bad. But the way he did it. Ugh
Would you think this if it wasn't a hammer?
In post 276, Burning_Earth wrote:
In post 254, Cho wrote:Didn't see the end of last page. I'll respond to Rubicon whenever I get back online. Busy day.

Oh, and I'm also debating whether or not I should vote Riptide. Partially because I'm kind of tired of their misrepresentative attacks on me, partially because it's the biggest wagon besides mine. Any thoughts? Would you call me out as scummy for being survivalistic, or are Town not allowed to want to avoid guaranteed mislynches?

Bye.
:(
BRILLIANT EXPLANATION
(why is he explaining
after
the vote anyway?)
In post 281, Burning_Earth wrote:That'll teach me to be checking VCs!
so forced
within one minute of the previous post
the force is strong with this one
Image

I like to spout verbal diarrhoea. It's fun for me
In [url=http://www.MafiaScum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=5853483#p5853483]post 292[/url], Burning_Earth wrote:I'm town pinky promise

(DISCLAIMER: THE CORRECT PLAY IS PROBABLY TO LYNCH ME)
Proper town attitude would be "I fucked up. I'll try to do what I can before I'm lynched."
Maybe.

I'm always looking for ways to improve my town game, thanks for offering that comment


:lol:
In [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=5861696#p5861696]post 370[/url], Burning_Earth wrote:
I have removed his "case" from this quote to save space

My case on riptide.

Riptide attacked cho without voting her until other people had.

Another masterpiece from B_E cases TM
Another masterpiece indeed. Looks like someone trying to make some noise and hoping nobody hears what they're actually saying
Image

That unfunny image does not make you right.

That isn't all my points. I hate cases, so when asked to make a case... I DONT WANNA! I DONT THINK SO!

I don't think he ever explained the underlined part
Image

So... My iPad is shit. Fuck, I'm scum, you got me.

In [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=5863543#p5863543]post 401[/url], Burning_Earth wrote:meh. I still don't see a better wagon.

Dunham wagon is shit. (1)
B_E wagon is shit
. You'd think I'd have more reads in 17 pages, but (2)
I'm not really invested in this game.
1. Again, not how town that knows they should die would play. They'd be trying to be as useful as possible.
2. Bullshit. He was actually pushing Riptide until the heat on himself got turned up.

1. But I don't wanna die!
2. If I was really invested in this game, then I would be posting more and reading more
In [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=5871181#p5871181]post 460[/url], Burning_Earth wrote:Hi guys.

I get that my quick hammering was bad, but seriously.

As scum, would I do that?
:Lol:

Two can play at that game.

Lololololololol ignore ignore ignore


These posts make me think that BPC could be a partner to B_E. It looks like B_E using BPC's case as a lazy way of defending himself, then realizing he probably shouldn't tie himself to his partner right before being lynched, distancing himself from BPC by saying his post was bad, and then going back to defend himself against SK without BPC's help to further diminish the tie.

Actually, I've found a lot of the play involving B_E and the BPC slot to be weird today. BPC's been attacking the case against B_E while not necessarily defending B_E, and now B_E does this weird flip flop on BPC's defense in the span of several minutes.
"Half of the game is figuring out who the scum is. The other half is convincing everyone else that you're right." -- PlaysWithSquirrels, in Newbie 437

Return to “Completed Mini Theme Games”