I love you BPC!In post 519, BipolarChemist wrote:What way? His immature, cocky way? Have you seen this kid before?In post 465, SleepyKrew wrote:Terrible vote
Not that voting Cho is itself bad. But the way he did it. Ugh
Because he's a dumbass.BRILLIANT EXPLANATIONIn post 276, Burning_Earth wrote:In post 254, Cho wrote:Didn't see the end of last page. I'll respond to Rubicon whenever I get back online. Busy day.
Oh, and I'm also debating whether or not I should vote Riptide. Partially because I'm kind of tired of their misrepresentative attacks on me, partially because it's the biggest wagon besides mine. Any thoughts? Would you call me out as scummy for being survivalistic, or are Town not allowed to want to avoid guaranteed mislynches?
Bye.
(why is he explainingafterthe vote anyway?)
Seems that way because he's a dumbass.so forcedIn post 281, Burning_Earth wrote:That'll teach me to be checking VCs!
I don't expect scum to react like he did. He passed it off as oh oops, my bad. Ignorant and dumb, ya, but I don't think it's scummy.within one minute of the previous postIn post 282, Burning_Earth wrote:Damn
the force is strong with this one
Think about how you would expect scum to react too. Same point as above.Proper town attitude would be "I fucked up. I'll try to do what I can before I'm lynched."In post 292, Burning_Earth wrote:I'm town pinky promise
(DISCLAIMER: THE CORRECT PLAY IS PROBABLY TO LYNCH ME)
I see the opposite here, looks like he's just failing at trying to get attention.Another masterpiece indeed. Looks like someone trying to make some noise and hoping nobody hears what they're actually sayingIn post 370, Burning_Earth wrote:I have removed his "case" from this quote to save space
My case on riptide.
Riptide attacked cho without voting her until other people had.
Another masterpiece from B_E cases TM
He hasn't explained a whole hell of a lot, which is one reason I think he's scummy. You're right here. I kinda took his link thing as more him being a dummy.I don't think he ever explained the underlined part
I think B_E generally plays a very selfish game. Both of the points you made point exactly to this.1. Again, not how town that knows they should die would play. They'd be trying to be as useful as possible.In post 401, Burning_Earth wrote:meh. I still don't see a better wagon.
Dunham wagon is shit. (1)B_E wagon is shit. You'd think I'd have more reads in 17 pages, but (2)I'm not really invested in this game.
2. Bullshit. He was actually pushing Riptide until the heat on himself got turned up.
Sorry for the quote wall. Overall, SK, your argument, to me, feels like something put together without much previous thought. I'm not sure you outwardly called him fully scummy very much here, yet you had such a strong scumread.
Anyways, I'm tired, I'm going to eat and pass out soon. Good night!
Mini 1568: Another Awesome Alliteration Adventure (over)
-
-
Burning_Earth Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1589
- Joined: January 26, 2014
-
-
Burning_Earth Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1589
- Joined: January 26, 2014
I agree with this post except for the bit in which I'm apparently scumIn post 513, SleepyKrew wrote:You seem to be thinking I did:
1. Determined B_E was scum/voted him
2. Read the game
3. Thought of why he was scum
4. Wrote the case
What actually happened:
1. Read the game
2. Thought he was scummy and looked deeper into it
3. Determined he's scum/voted him
4. Wrote the case
5. Had some fried chicken and mashed potatoes
You seem to be tunneling on me? Is that confirmation bias? Or is what you're doing not tunneling?
Also
In post 490, BipolarChemist wrote:B_E just feels like lynch bait to me, an easy lynch without much thought because he's done basically nothing except for a dumb ass quick hammer. I think even my own scum read on him might be more based on that he's an easy lynch target and someone who isn't helpful rather than scummy.
@TSO: I agree that scum would normally give reasoning, where someone giving no reason feels more town, but dunham didn't seem to give a shit either. I think his no reasoning might just be null.
How much time does it take to make a waffle? 4 minutesIn post 492, BipolarChemist wrote:I'm not a fan of SleepyKrew analysis of B_E, it feels forced and like he's got a bit of confirmation bias going on.-
-
Burning_Earth Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1589
- Joined: January 26, 2014
Your post is bad though. You defend me although heaps while still having a scum read on me.In post 525, Burning_Earth wrote:
I love you BPC!In post 519, BipolarChemist wrote:
What way? His immature, cocky way? Have you seen this kid before?In post 465, SleepyKrew wrote:Terrible vote
Not that voting Cho is itself bad. But the way he did it. Ugh
Because he's a dumbass.
BRILLIANT EXPLANATIONIn post 276, Burning_Earth wrote:In post 254, Cho wrote:Didn't see the end of last page. I'll respond to Rubicon whenever I get back online. Busy day.
Oh, and I'm also debating whether or not I should vote Riptide. Partially because I'm kind of tired of their misrepresentative attacks on me, partially because it's the biggest wagon besides mine. Any thoughts? Would you call me out as scummy for being survivalistic, or are Town not allowed to want to avoid guaranteed mislynches?
Bye.
(why is he explainingafterthe vote anyway?)
Seems that way because he's a dumbass.
so forcedIn post 281, Burning_Earth wrote:That'll teach me to be checking VCs!
I don't expect scum to react like he did. He passed it off as oh oops, my bad. Ignorant and dumb, ya, but I don't think it's scummy.
within one minute of the previous postIn post 282, Burning_Earth wrote:Damn
the force is strong with this one
Think about how you would expect scum to react too. Same point as above.
Proper town attitude would be "I fucked up. I'll try to do what I can before I'm lynched."In post 292, Burning_Earth wrote:I'm town pinky promise
(DISCLAIMER: THE CORRECT PLAY IS PROBABLY TO LYNCH ME)
I see the opposite here, looks like he's just failing at trying to get attention.
Another masterpiece indeed. Looks like someone trying to make some noise and hoping nobody hears what they're actually sayingIn post 370, Burning_Earth wrote:I have removed his "case" from this quote to save space
My case on riptide.
Riptide attacked cho without voting her until other people had.
Another masterpiece from B_E cases TM
He hasn't explained a whole hell of a lot, which is one reason I think he's scummy. You're right here. I kinda took his link thing as more him being a dummy.I don't think he ever explained the underlined part
I think B_E generally plays a very selfish game. Both of the points you made point exactly to this.
1. Again, not how town that knows they should die would play. They'd be trying to be as useful as possible.In post 401, Burning_Earth wrote:meh. I still don't see a better wagon.
Dunham wagon is shit. (1)B_E wagon is shit. You'd think I'd have more reads in 17 pages, but (2)I'm not really invested in this game.
2. Bullshit. He was actually pushing Riptide until the heat on himself got turned up.
Sorry for the quote wall. Overall, SK, your argument, to me, feels like something put together without much previous thought. I'm not sure you outwardly called him fully scummy very much here, yet you had such a strong scumread.
Anyways, I'm tired, I'm going to eat and pass out soon. Good night!-
-
Burning_Earth Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1589
- Joined: January 26, 2014
I'd still like to see this please.In post 511, Riptide wrote:Okay, well, uh, dice and I are working on something pertaining to B_E, but Sleepy already said my part of the post... So...
BPC- Would you care to show us what posts he made that lead you to think he's town and explain why they do, please.
-HS-
-
SleepyKrew he/himSnark Attackhe/him
- Snark Attack
- Snark Attack
- Posts: 15746
- Joined: April 27, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: quack
-
-
SleepyKrew he/himSnark Attackhe/him
- Snark Attack
- Snark Attack
- Posts: 15746
- Joined: April 27, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: quack
-
-
Burning_Earth Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1589
- Joined: January 26, 2014
In post 465, SleepyKrew wrote:Terrible vote
Not that voting Cho is itself bad. But the way he did it. Ugh
Would you think this if it wasn't a hammer?
BRILLIANT EXPLANATIONIn post 276, Burning_Earth wrote:In post 254, Cho wrote:Didn't see the end of last page. I'll respond to Rubicon whenever I get back online. Busy day.
Oh, and I'm also debating whether or not I should vote Riptide. Partially because I'm kind of tired of their misrepresentative attacks on me, partially because it's the biggest wagon besides mine. Any thoughts? Would you call me out as scummy for being survivalistic, or are Town not allowed to want to avoid guaranteed mislynches?
Bye.
(why is he explainingafterthe vote anyway?)
so forcedIn post 281, Burning_Earth wrote:That'll teach me to be checking VCs!
within one minute of the previous postIn post 282, Burning_Earth wrote:Damn
the force is strong with this one
I like to spout verbal diarrhoea. It's fun for me
Proper town attitude would be "I fucked up. I'll try to do what I can before I'm lynched."In [url=http://www.MafiaScum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=5853483#p5853483]post 292[/url], Burning_Earth wrote:I'm town pinky promise
(DISCLAIMER: THE CORRECT PLAY IS PROBABLY TO LYNCH ME)
Maybe.
I'm always looking for ways to improve my town game, thanks for offering that comment
In post 295, Burning_Earth wrote:she made some really bad posts. See 254.
Another masterpiece indeed. Looks like someone trying to make some noise and hoping nobody hears what they're actually sayingIn post 370, Burning_Earth wrote:I have removed his "case" from this quote to save space
My case on riptide.
Riptide attacked cho without voting her until other people had.
Another masterpiece from B_E cases TM
That unfunny image does not make you right.
That isn't all my points. I hate cases, so when asked to make a case... I DONT WANNA! I DONT THINK SO!
I don't think he ever explained the underlined part
So... My iPad is shit. Fuck, I'm scum, you got me.
1. Again, not how town that knows they should die would play. They'd be trying to be as useful as possible.In post 401, Burning_Earth wrote:meh. I still don't see a better wagon.
Dunham wagon is shit. (1)B_E wagon is shit. You'd think I'd have more reads in 17 pages, but (2)I'm not really invested in this game.
2. Bullshit. He was actually pushing Riptide until the heat on himself got turned up.
1. But I don't wanna die!
2. If I was really invested in this game, then I would be posting more and reading more
:Lol:In post 460, Burning_Earth wrote:Hi guys.
I get that my quick hammering was bad, but seriously.
As scum, would I do that?
Two can play at that game.
Lololololololol ignore ignore ignore-
-
Burning_Earth Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1589
- Joined: January 26, 2014
Note: logical fallacyIn post 530, SleepyKrew wrote:Of note: Egg is the only player to not have expressed a scumread on Burning
Though BPC's is waffley syrupy goodness
Claim: VT-
-
N Jack of All Trades
-
-
SleepyKrew he/himSnark Attackhe/him
- Snark Attack
- Snark Attack
- Posts: 15746
- Joined: April 27, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: quack
What's the fallacy and what's your rolenameIn post 532, Burning_Earth wrote:
Note: logical fallacyIn post 530, SleepyKrew wrote:Of note: Egg is the only player to not have expressed a scumread on Burning
Though BPC's is waffley syrupy goodness
Claim: VTTo be clear: quack-
-
Burning_Earth Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1589
- Joined: January 26, 2014
-
-
SleepyKrew he/himSnark Attackhe/him
- Snark Attack
- Snark Attack
- Posts: 15746
- Joined: April 27, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: quack
I wasn't implying anything. I was stating facts for my own potential future use as well as that of anyone else.In post 535, Burning_Earth wrote:Fallacy: popularity doesn't mean correctness
Role name: uh, it's in the OP, so don't know what tell you're trying to extract from me here. Average Anybody.
So then why didn't you say that at first?
But no you didn't do what I was hoping you'd do
Oh wellTo be clear: quack-
-
Burning_Earth Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1589
- Joined: January 26, 2014
-
-
SleepyKrew he/himSnark Attackhe/him
- Snark Attack
- Snark Attack
- Posts: 15746
- Joined: April 27, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: quack
Because you hadn't stated it in the first placeIn post 537, Burning_Earth wrote:So, what was the purpose of asking me to state my role name again?
My goal was to get you to mix the two of us up.In post 537, Burning_Earth wrote:Also, what was I hoping for you to do? I'm quite interested, as you are apparently a master of the subconscious mind.
Mission Accomplished
SleepyKrew out
peace love and hammers
To be clear: quack-
-
Burning_Earth Mafia Scum
-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
-
-
SleepyKrew he/himSnark Attackhe/him
- Snark Attack
- Snark Attack
- Posts: 15746
- Joined: April 27, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: quack
-
-
SleepyKrew he/himSnark Attackhe/him
- Snark Attack
- Snark Attack
- Posts: 15746
- Joined: April 27, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: quack
-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
I was "what"ing at this. I don't understand.In post 538, SleepyKrew wrote:My goal was to get you to mix the two of us up.still the same old MTD-
-
SleepyKrew he/himSnark Attackhe/him
- Snark Attack
- Snark Attack
- Posts: 15746
- Joined: April 27, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: quack
-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
Ah, okay, so that doesn't really matter, does it?In post 544, SleepyKrew wrote:Reread the question on the second line of 537still the same old MTD-
-
Egg Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5426
- Joined: December 16, 2010
-
-
The Betting Pool Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 470
- Joined: January 7, 2014
-
-
The Betting Pool Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 470
- Joined: January 7, 2014
-
-
toolenduso Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: April 10, 2007
In post 547, The Betting Pool wrote:Why not look to see if he used the sample role PM as an actual role before.
In post 525, Burning_Earth wrote:I love you BPC!In post 527, Burning_Earth wrote:Your post is bad though. You defend me although heaps while still having a scum read on me.Spoiler: Post 531
These posts make me think that BPC could be a partner to B_E. It looks like B_E using BPC's case as a lazy way of defending himself, then realizing he probably shouldn't tie himself to his partner right before being lynched, distancing himself from BPC by saying his post was bad, and then going back to defend himself against SK without BPC's help to further diminish the tie.
Actually, I've found a lot of the play involving B_E and the BPC slot to be weird today. BPC's been attacking the case against B_E while not necessarily defending B_E, and now B_E does this weird flip flop on BPC's defense in the span of several minutes."Half of the game is figuring out who the scum is. The other half is convincing everyone else that you're right." -- PlaysWithSquirrels, in Newbie 437
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.