Mini 1568: Another Awesome Alliteration Adventure (over)

Burning_Earth · Post Post #375 (ISO) » Thu May 01, 2014 2:28 pm

In post 373, BipolarChemist wrote:That sounded quite angry there, Riptide. Defensive much?

Wut?

Nah, I make posts like that all the time. It's just Hs's play style (yes, I can tell it isn't you dice

)

BipolarChemist · Post Post #376 (ISO) » Thu May 01, 2014 2:29 pm

Your posts suck shit, B_E.

BipolarChemist · Post Post #377 (ISO) » Thu May 01, 2014 2:29 pm

Burning_Earth · Post Post #378 (ISO) » Thu May 01, 2014 2:49 pm

In post 376, BipolarChemist wrote:Your posts suck shit, B_E.

I'm more experienced than you sonny Jim.

So watch it.

The Betting Pool · Post Post #379 (ISO) » Thu May 01, 2014 2:54 pm

In post 376, BipolarChemist wrote:Your posts suck shit, B_E.

be nice...

I agree with your vote on Dunham and until P_A forces me to change it, let me join you

VOTE: dunham

Question though, you have B_E and Dunham as scum reads. If one flips town does it hurt your read of the other? In other words, are you reading them as a team or separate?

BipolarChemist · Post Post #380 (ISO) » Thu May 01, 2014 3:06 pm

B_E and Dunham reads are definitely separate, I don't think if one flips town my opinion on the other would change, but of course there are things that can change my opinion! (winkwink)

Experience doesn't mean that you're automatically better than me, B_E! Also, I think I've been playing longer than you, maybe?

BipolarChemist · Post Post #381 (ISO) » Thu May 01, 2014 3:07 pm

Also, Dun is like L-2.

N · Post Post #382 (ISO) » Thu May 01, 2014 3:50 pm

amphora

noun
a large two-handled storage jar having an oval body, usually tapering to a point at the base, with a pair of handles extending from immediately below the lip to the shoulder: used chiefly for oil, wine, etc., and, set on a foot, as a commemorative vase awarded the victors in contests such as the Panathenaic games.

Vote Count 2.04

toolenduso

(0)

The Betting Pool

(0)

Rubicon

(0)

BipolarChemist

(0)

Jargonaut

(0)

Dunhamganger

(4)

Egg, Rubicon, BipolarChemist, The Betting Pool

MTD

(0)

T S O

(0)

Riptide

(2) Burning_Earth, Jargonaut

Burning_Earth

(1) toolenduso

Egg

(0)

Not Voting

(4) Dunhamganger, MTD, T S O, Riptide

With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

Deadline is in

(expired on 2014-05-11 23:11:32)

Burning_Earth · Post Post #383 (ISO) » Thu May 01, 2014 4:46 pm

In post 380, BipolarChemist wrote:B_E and Dunham reads are definitely separate, I don't think if one flips town my opinion on the other would change, but of course there are things that can change my opinion! (winkwink)

Experience doesn't mean that you're automatically better than me, B_E! Also, I think I've been playing longer than you, maybe?

7 completed games

started playing in october 2013

I win.

BipolarChemist · Post Post #384 (ISO) » Thu May 01, 2014 4:58 pm

Off forum I've been playing for a few years...

BipolarChemist · Post Post #385 (ISO) » Thu May 01, 2014 5:05 pm

Yep, since December 2012. 17 completed games. Ha!

Burning_Earth · Post Post #386 (ISO) » Thu May 01, 2014 5:18 pm

I'm still town though.

The Betting Pool · Post Post #387 (ISO) » Thu May 01, 2014 6:00 pm

Hey BPC, I'm really checked out of this game right now (will read it over tonight if I stay awake/focus long enough) but I'd love to know why you have a town read on us.

Don't agree with the Dunhamganger vote but willing to see what happens. Plus, like I said, not on top of things, so.

The Betting Pool · Post Post #388 (ISO) » Thu May 01, 2014 6:01 pm

Crap, ^ is --PA

Riptide · Post Post #389 (ISO) » Fri May 02, 2014 12:11 am

B_E the links work fine for me. Oh, and message from dice-
To: B_E when you said that we waited for others to vote Cho before I voted
From: Dice
I was trying to figure out exactly what Cho was stating, and when I felt like I had a clear understanding I voted. It's not like I waited, not saying anything until someone voted, then jumped in and voted.

-HS

Egg · Post Post #390 (ISO) » Fri May 02, 2014 6:28 am

I'm short on time but I just wanna say I approve of the Dunham wagon.

BipolarChemist · Post Post #391 (ISO) » Fri May 02, 2014 8:27 am

In post 387, The Betting Pool wrote:Hey BPC, I'm really checked out of this game right now (will read it over tonight if I stay awake/focus long enough) but I'd love to know why you have a town read on us.

Don't agree with the Dunhamganger vote but willing to see what happens. Plus, like I said, not on top of things, so.

I feel like you and your other head may be on different pages :p

Your vote for Cho was what really made me think that you're town, it seemed almost cocky, and you were sure of yourself. I don't see scum being so open on that vote, especially with the votes being split day 1. Of course, there is the off chance you and Riptide are partners and you went to get your not partner lynched, but after I did a quick scan through, I doubted this.

MTD · Post Post #392 (ISO) » Fri May 02, 2014 9:55 am

I don't approve of the dunham wagon. Yeah, he doesn't seem very invested and his posts are generally not that serious, but really, that doesn't scream scum to me and as others said, the not-that-seriousness seems to be in his meta.
It really just seems to be an easy target which scum would love to hop on to me.

Also:

In post 390, Egg wrote:I'm short on time but I just wanna say I approve of the Dunham wagon.

Why this? You are voting him, it is obvious you approve, so why say this?

T S O · Post Post #393 (ISO) » Fri May 02, 2014 10:02 am

I'll clock in tomorrow with a post - I will say I still don't like the Dunham wagon.

BipolarChemist · Post Post #394 (ISO) » Fri May 02, 2014 10:06 am

Well he needs to say something, like geez.

toolenduso · Post Post #395 (ISO) » Fri May 02, 2014 11:16 am

Will post later today.

Rubicon · Post Post #396 (ISO) » Fri May 02, 2014 11:16 am

TSO: I'd be interested to know who you think is scummiest relative to the Cho wagon from yesterday.

In post 365, T S O wrote:The Jargonaut-scum argument bores me because it feels like it's more rhetoric than anyway solid.

What's your read on Jargonaut, anyway?

Rubicon · Post Post #397 (ISO) » Fri May 02, 2014 11:20 am

In post 392, MTD wrote:I don't approve of the dunham wagon. Yeah, he doesn't seem very invested and his posts are generally not that serious, but really, that doesn't scream scum to me and as others said, the not-that-seriousness seems to be in his meta.
It really just seems to be an easy target which scum would love to hop on to me.

Also:
In post 390, Egg wrote:I'm short on time but I just wanna say I approve of the Dunham wagon.
Why this? You are voting him, it is obvious you approve, so why say this?

Start an alternative wagon and give us a good reason to vote it with you.

Jargonaut · Post Post #398 (ISO) » Fri May 02, 2014 11:34 am

In post 396, Rubicon wrote: What's your read on Jargonaut, anyway?

What's yours?

For the record, I don't think Dunham is a good wagon, especially given the fact that he isn't here to answer any accusations. Like MTD said, it seems like mislynch-bait.

UNVOTE: Riptide. I looked through their day 1 posts again, and not much actually stands out as particularly scummy compared to what I thought I remembered. Taking into account their overnight case on Elyse, I'm not confident in pushing them.

In post 372, Riptide wrote:
In post 370, Burning_Earth wrote:...
I'm gonna use myself as an example- you read my case/ISO on Elyse? You saw how I explained what I was thinking as I was looking through the posts? Please do.

You never answered this BE.

Jargonaut · Post Post #399 (ISO) » Fri May 02, 2014 11:34 am

Oh I forgot about the new line thing.

UNVOTE: Riptide