Open 18 - Game Over - before 424

[spectrumvoid]

I'll try to keep this as unemotional as possible.

John: Why the heck do you keep bringing up your relationship with panzer in real life? TAKE IT OUT NOW. And why the heck do you keep talking about panzer and how he behaves in real life and using it to justify your pathetic defense? Ever heard of children who got raped by predators who behave like nice guys on the 'net?

If you think you're playing badly, DO SOMETHING. You say you'll take it out, but you don't do anything in that post itself. And you say you realise that you're defending panzer based on irrelevant issues, and yet you don't do anything about it? I cut you slack because I assumed you didn't know. Your latest post proves that you obviously know, and yet you're not doing anything about it.

[spectrumvoid]

Note to rest: Pissed off as hell because of a dumb newbie who refuses to do anything when I've been so nice about his dumb mistakes, but not voting because John-scum relies on panzer-scum, and directing lynches = bad.

[Simenon]

Bah. I had a response to IH, but I got CPU'd.

[IH]

So..... nothing else from it? Just you lost the response?

= |

[LyingBrian]

all players not posting within the last 72 hours have been prodded... just a note for future reference, i'll probably be checking now 2x a week, Sunday & Wednesday since those are my off days & i have more time...

[mustafa15]

Can we just lynch panzer? Or maybe talk about why we should lynch panzer? LB's going to mass-modkill if we don't start doing shit.

My thoughts exactly

[IH]

FoS:TCS

A mass modkill is an overexagerration.

I've never seen a modkill for inactivity on 'Scum. (The site, not the role)

[Simenon]

I'd like you to back up the claim that only newb scum spam, because that's contrary to my experience.

I was on Ripley because he wanted to lynch John because of his spam and not necessarily because john may or may not be scum. He wanted to lynch john because "he might hurt the town". I classify that behavior as a scum tell.

[LyingBrian]

Vote Count:

• [3] Panzerjager
  • John
    
  • mustafa15
    
  • The Central Scrutinizer
• [2] John
  • IH
    
  • Ripley
• [1] mustafa15
  • Panzerjager
• [1] Ripley
  • Simenon
• [1] The Central Scrutinizer
  • bird1111
• [1] NOT VOTING
  • spectrumvoid

Lynch:

5 votes

[IH]

Once more, since it was deleted, it is just a general observation. I do not know of a specific example at the moment.

It's just that newb town are more likely to lurk and say "There's nothing to talk about" than spam up the thread.

[John]

ehh, not true. when i was a new (still kinda am) i posted alot. sure, alot or most may do that, but dont sterotype it.

[spectrumvoid]

Back.

I remember

vote: John

because I checked back. His scumminess is not based on panzer scum, so he's scum.

[PJ.]

Panzer's not scum.

[John]

Back.

I remember

vote: John

because I checked back. His scumminess is not based on panzer scum, so he's scum.

What? What the hell does that mean?

[Ripley]

Two posts from me have been lost. One was mostly a response to Simenon, after which I think he said he'd taken the whole issue far enough and unvoted. I also asked what exactly the case against Panzerjager was, other than reacting when he found himself at lynch -1 on page 2, which I thought was not unreasonable. And I said I was a bit surprised by spectrumvoid getting so worked up.

My other post was in response to John asking whether I would agree that he'd stopped the spamming, and I said yes, I did agree, but that he had stopped before and started again so I wasn't counting on anything just yet.

One thought that went briefly through my mind but that I never posted was the possibility that Panzerjager, seeing that John is taking nearly all the flak for their exchanges, might have at least semi-deliberately provoked him. It was fairly predictable that his post 83:

John will never be capable of sophisticated acts so QTF of the above.

would get John absolutely incensed and start him off again.

[Simenon]

Unvote, Vote spectrumvoid

.

And again.

[mustafa15]

Panzer's not scum.

Gosh, ok.

I'm here.

[Simenon]

gah.

I'd like john to claim.

[Ripley]

You just voted spectrumvoid, who just voted john, and you want

john

to claim?

[Simenon]

Yep. This game is moving at a slow pace, john is at -1 to lynch, and I honestly don't see a good reason to let this game drag.

I think spectrumvoid is scummy. But that doesn't mean it's not proper for john to claim at this point.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Yep. This game is moving at a slow pace, john is at -1 to lynch, and I honestly don't see a good reason to let this game drag.

I think spectrumvoid is scummy. But that doesn't mean it's not proper for john to claim at this point.

John's not at -1. Oops?

[Simenon]

I read panzer as john, who would have been at -1 if spectrumvoid had voted him. :/
I guess I confused this with another ongoing game.

[John]

My question still has not been answered.

Simenon, be careful of what you say. the last few posts made me want to vote you, but im going to belive that you are making a mistake, considering you are in other games w/ me.

PS: i claim i am pro-town

[IH]

Ok. Seriously.

FoS:Simenon

John is not at minus 1

You don't think he's scummy

you WANT him to claim?

[Simenon]

Please read my last post.

I had confused this game with newbie 313, where I also asked sprectrumvoid to claim because I thought she was about to be lynched.

And yes, I value principle and standard procedure over my individual interpretation.