Mini 414-Anime Mafia | GAME OVAH!

spectrumvoid · Post Post #400 (ISO) » Thu Apr 19, 2007 3:17 am

revote: Yama

thrawn1020 · Post Post #401 (ISO) » Thu Apr 19, 2007 5:29 am

Sweet, the forums are back!'

I am here, but I'm saying upfront that I will be gone for this entire weekend, starting tomorrow at around 10 AM.

I hope to check before then, but it may not happen. I am hoping that the mod will give us a votecount sometime before Sunday, because I think a lot has been changing recently, and my memory is fried.

Unvote

, if I was voting. Have a merry time.

AbboTT · Post Post #402 (ISO) » Thu Apr 19, 2007 7:14 am

Yay! We're back online.

Who wants to die?

Skruffs · Post Post #403 (ISO) » Thu Apr 19, 2007 8:16 am

I believe yamo was voting cubsfan, and cubsfan was voting yama...
And *someone* had posted a very nice attack against yama about voting with intent to lynch vs bandwawgoning, etc.

Mert · Post Post #404 (ISO) » Thu Apr 19, 2007 8:19 am

I wrote a long post about Yama just before downtime and now it's all lost

I remember I stopped short of voting as the VC seemed a bit messed up and didn't want him at L-1 accidentally...

IH · Post Post #405 (ISO) » Thu Apr 19, 2007 9:49 am

----------------Votecount-------------

Cubsfan4ever -1- (Yamahako)
Yamahako -3- (skruffs, Cubsfan4ever, SpectrumVoid)

Not Voting-(Ubertimmy, Mert, Cuban Smoker, Abbott, Thrawn1020)

With 9 alive it's 5 to lynch

Votecount should be correct. Last one I had, except for I added in SV's vote on Yamahako.

Everyone should post HERE in the thread, so I can take roll and such and see who needs replacing.

Mert · Post Post #406 (ISO) » Thu Apr 19, 2007 10:58 am

IH, you have me as both voting for Yamahako and not voting. In the interest of clarity,

unvote

as I don't want Yama to be at L-1 at least until other players have checked in.

IH, even when you're the

mod

, you're still scum, trying to mislead the town like that...

Yamahako · Post Post #407 (ISO) » Thu Apr 19, 2007 11:55 am

I thought I explained the difference in voting to have a lynch instead of a no lynch, and advocating for someone's lynch who is found to be pro-town (and an easy lynch target at that).

Cubs fan was scummy yesterday and I think he would have been the lynch if he wasn't out of town.

So much lost posting in all my games I was super active

Mert · Post Post #408 (ISO) » Thu Apr 19, 2007 12:04 pm

I think some of the Yama posts I looked at are still here so I'll try my best to represent my argument when I'm more awake.

spectrumvoid · Post Post #409 (ISO) » Fri Apr 20, 2007 2:17 am

The case for yama is him voting for someone he didn't find scummy. Yama answered by saying he did that to prevent a no lynch. The issue here is that Yama didn't present an alternative lynch target (if he did, he wasn't forceful enough about it.)

I voted him for that + trying to evade responsiblity.

Yamahako · Post Post #410 (ISO) » Fri Apr 20, 2007 7:13 am

spectrumvoid wrote:The case for yama is him voting for someone he didn't find scummy. Yama answered by saying he did that to prevent a no lynch. The issue here is that Yama didn't present an alternative lynch target (if he did, he wasn't forceful enough about it.)

I voted him for that + trying to evade responsiblity.

I was pretty implicit at trying to get a lynch on Cubsfan yesterday, but he was

out of town

so people didn't want to get on the wagon.

It really sucks to lose about 2 pages of discussion :-/ I was making a case against Cubsfan and he was trying to detrail with craplogic - there wasn't a real case against me before the crash - though many people were asking me questions asking me to clarify my points.

Cubsfan4ever · Post Post #411 (ISO) » Fri Apr 20, 2007 10:42 am

I was making a case against Cubsfan and he was trying to detrail with craplogic

rofl at re-visionist history

Skruffs · Post Post #412 (ISO) » Fri Apr 20, 2007 11:11 am

We can only start over from scratch. If you guys want to go to town on each other again, feel free.
I was rereading a bit, and I think I want to look at Mert a bit closer. Mert was the one pushing for an andrews lynch without really contributing much else.

Skruffs · Post Post #413 (ISO) » Sat Apr 21, 2007 1:27 pm

Mert Mert Mert.

Mert · Post Post #414 (ISO) » Sat Apr 21, 2007 1:43 pm

Apologies, full response tomorrow. I'll admit I haven't got around to the re-read of this thread that I'd promised myself I'd do but I'll make sure I a) re-present my suspicions of Yamahako and b) respond to Skruffs by tomorrow evening.

IH · Post Post #415 (ISO) » Sun Apr 22, 2007 9:13 am

Please post more, I'll be sending out prods on everyone who hasn't checked in yet.

cuban smoker · Post Post #416 (ISO) » Sun Apr 22, 2007 9:45 am

I also remember not being happy with Mert. Didn't like one of my posts where I was trying to help the town and voted me for it.

I'm sad the board crashed again.

AbboTT · Post Post #417 (ISO) » Sun Apr 22, 2007 11:37 am

man--- In a game where the records of what people have said is everything, losing records really changes it all.

My notes are useless.

AbboTT · Post Post #418 (ISO) » Sun Apr 22, 2007 11:37 am

Edit: *some* of my notes are useless.

Don't get too sloppy, scum

spectrumvoid · Post Post #419 (ISO) » Mon Apr 23, 2007 2:20 am

I need someone to confirm what yama said about cubsfan. I remember someone saying something like cubsfan was out of town, but I lost my notes and can't remember what yama said.

AbboTT · Post Post #420 (ISO) » Mon Apr 23, 2007 7:27 am

IIRC; I am pretty sure that Cubs would have been the lynch had he been around.

If that's what you mean.

thrawn1020 · Post Post #421 (ISO) » Mon Apr 23, 2007 10:30 am

I am curious as to the nature of the Mert suspicions. I have voted Mert several times, but I can never seem to justify keeping the vote there very long. That is one reason I'm not voting currently. If cuban and Skruffs would be so kind as to explain, I would be very happy.

spectrumvoid · Post Post #422 (ISO) » Tue Apr 24, 2007 4:50 am

Thrawn: So are you saying that you were wagoning on the Mert wagon, since you apparently have no reason for voting him in the past?

cuban smoker · Post Post #423 (ISO) » Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:10 am

My case against Mert: I was trying to explain why I thought a name-claim would be a good idea, and suggested we try and use a random list to make people go in an arbitrary order. Mert didn't like it or understand it and voted me for it. I think ubertimmy jumped on shortly after.

I find above behaviour scummy.

thrawn1020 · Post Post #424 (ISO) » Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:37 am

No, I just had very minor reasons for doing so i.e. random voting or voting placed for reactions by other players. I have voted Mert twice in this game, the first of which had to do with suspicions related to Mert's voting of AndrewS over the Jack question. In the same post as I placed the vote, I expressed the fact that it was not a very solid vote. I promptly resumed voting for Mert after the night phase. However, it was pretty clearly a lead/joke on my part.

So, my question to Spectrumvoid is this: Whatever gave you the idea that I had

no

reason to vote Mert in the past?

To clarify: I unvoted to avoid the wagon getting momentum before reasons were presented, of which a few have been. Waiting on Skruffs' opinion. And waiting to decide whether or not there is sufficient reason to vote Mert for real.