Okay so we know that Vryklan was not lurking, I still don’t see good explanation why Vryklan still has 4 votes on him.
VRK’s reason
[quote=”VRK”]
1. The first one is, I believe, a random vote from the beginning of the game. The others stem from Vryk not answering Gorckat's question in post 107 and then disappearing for 3 days (read: Lurking).
2. My vote is a pressure vote, and if his explanation to Gorc's question in 107 is answered to my satisfaction, I'll remove it.
[quote=”Gorc”] Setting aside that Guardian did use the dice tag, I fail to see how the number you would select proves that Guardian chose it deliberately[/quote] [/qupote]
First point is void. I answered it.
[quote=”Raffles] I don't count the d12 roll against him. We know each other, and we would both know we would vote each other for a laugh. That's what he meant by the emphasis of 11. [/quote]
2nd point is sort of a valid as a pressure vote stand alone. But you did say if the first question is answered you’ll remove the vote.
Mustafa’s reason
[quote=”Mustafa”] I don't count the d12 roll against him. We know each other, and we would both know we would vote each other for a laugh. That's what he meant by the emphasis of 11. [/quote]
Since your reason is same as VRK’s, I’ll expect an explanation from you as well once you get back.
Avinyl’s reason
[quote=”Avinyl”] Putting the third vote on someone is as good a reason as any for being random voted.[/quote]
Very old reason. I expect a better reason at this stage.
Guardian’s reason
[quote=”Guardian”] Well he knows Raffles IRL... And maybe he is a mafioso and would want Raffles out of the game. Combined with this very good catch by gorckat and Vryklan claiming shotgun (mafia I assume) in post 108, Unvote, Vote: Vryklan![/quote]
We have explained the shotgun too, this is no longer valid either.
I need explanation on why they still have the vote on Vryklan, since non of these are valid, save maybe pressure voting. I got a gut feeling that there is a very good chance that there is at least one scum on this wagon.
Of the four, I find Guardian suspicious the most. His reason is very stretchy, Vryklan explained himself on “shotgun”, yet he still hasn’t unvoted. His first part of wanting me out doesn’t really makes sense. And I also noticed that Vryklan has his vote on Guardian. I refuted his reasons, yet he still has kept the vote on him. I’m adding the consideration of scum-distancing. It would be interesting if Guardian actually turned out to be a scum.
Vote: Guardian
