petroleumjelly wrote:Again, I will point out:
PJ, Just earlier wrote:...you don't have much behavior on which to touch on, so this wording strikes me as overly dismissive.
True, and I'll try to address your points fairly.
petroleumjelly wrote:
1.)
Post 1829, you mention Dead Rikimaru off-hand as an early-game suspicion.
2.)
Post 1830, you mention a few people you think are town/scum, but with absolutely no reasoning (read: nothing
I
can comment on).
3.)
Post 1831, you are calling people who found Pooky suspicious on D2 suspicious.
4.)
Post 1832, you further this line of thought. You again call somebody pro-town with no reasoning whatsoever.
Note
: I also find it silly how anybody who started poking at Pooky on D2 suspicious. I'm not sure what you expect - what would you have thought if
nobody
picked up on the Pooky suspicion? Though I cannot speak for others, I didn't poke at Pooky until D2 because I didn't find him overly
suspicious
until D2.
I just found it strange how a number of people suddenly came out with Pooky votes very easily when Glork is pretty much alone in his suspicions Day 1.
petroleumjelly wrote:5.)
Post 1837, again a post with very little reasoning, even though it is accompanied with three votes.
Yeah, those are mostly placeholders. I intended to outline the notes I have on them, but with such a big thread, that takes a while to do...
For now, they are mostly there for others to see where my opinions are at the moment.
petroleumjelly wrote:And since I am
also
suspicious of SV, I wasn't going to start poking you about that. Given what little you have actually talked about
besides that
in the game, I'm afraid I don't understand how else I'm supposed to do anything but "pick out a rather small part of my posts so far to consider". Fact is, there isn't much to consider in your posts as they are currently, so I figured I'd start by asking about your change in opinion on DR/Smashy. It will be possible for me to have more pointed questions once you start giving explanations.
Fair enough.
DR/Smashy:
- he tried to make too much out of the pablito/Glork interaction page 2
This is the only negative thing I have listed.
- seems genuinely lost
Yes, he was a very absent king, but lurking does not equate scumminess. He seemed swamped and pretty lost as a king, trying but not really sure enough to take responsibility.
I think it would have been much easier for scum to fake certainty (you can just pick the player people find most suspicious). His behaviour matches what I'd expect for someone who doesn't want to go down as a bad king and doesn't know what choice to make in order to avoid that.
- very quick wagon
Also, the case on him built up so fast and on so little that I think scum involvement is pretty likely.
All in all, I wouldn't want to clear him for being lost as a king, but I do think it is all the case against him is supported by. He hasn't really done anything significantly scummy.
