Patrick, I have a problem with your theory:
Mr Stoofer wrote:
Thesp: 6 (ChannelDelibird Cogito Ergo Sum Adele Mgm Glork Zindaras)
Ether: 3 (MrBuddyLee Nightfall Thesp)
Mgm: 1 (Patrick)
Adele: 1 (Fritzler)
Nightfall : 1 (Ether)
Not voting: Mr Stoofer
I reread Ether's posts surrounding the failure to Thesp-lynch and don't think her dithering looks guaranteed genuine. Your logic that she's not scum because she didn't hammer in a hammerable situation would imply that MBL, Nightfall, Thesp, Patrick, Ether are protown and the remaining scum are in {CES, MGM, Glork, Zindy}. I see Glork and MgM as significantly townish, which would narrow that list to {CES, Zindy} in my eyes. In light of your theory about Ether not hammering, can you please update your list of suspicions?
===============================================
I agree Thesp was probably Fritz's N1 target. I started rereading Thesp when Fritz's death came up, and have the following comments and questions. I don't think Thesp is on the table for today--view this as grist for later days if we don't hit a godfather.
Thesp suspecting MBL, Nightfall, Andrew, CDB early... weak scumpartner in the midst of a bunch of town is a possibility.
Bold play possibly shooting for an investigation.
Has a problem with my expression of multiple scumtheories.
Finds CDB “disconcerting”. Odd choice of words. And Zindy's posts “seem odd”.
Makes a point of agreeing with Glork about “a bunch of townies ripping each other apart”. If Thesp is scum this would be interpreted as a segue to lynching lurkers like CDB, Ether and Nightfall.
Good, nuanced questions to CDB in his 40th post that don't look insincere.
Lazy reply to MBL's question about his D1 suspicions. Revisionist history of D1 suspicion list: drops Nightfall, keeps MBL and CDB on list.
Pretty involved interaction with CDB twice in a week. Shows a detailed level of questioning CBD about a particular passage, not once but twice.
Differentiates his D1 behavior from CES's D2 citing “same fervor, different substance”. Does not bite on the invitation to go into detail on CES. But he did FOS CES a few posts earlier for an unrelated violation (“the old 1-2”).
His clearest call to lynch CDB:
Thesp wrote:ChannelDelibird is exhibiting the classic characteristics of scum silently pushing terrible wagons, showing up only when called on. This must stop, and lynching him is the way to do it.
Switches to Adele for practical (survival) reasons while reiterating CDB hate.
Defends Glork for “putting last nail in his coffin”, WIFOM too obvious to be busing? At the time, Glork+Thesp looked like a legit scumpair.
Takes offense at Glork's accusation that Thesp tried to hug Glork tightly on the way down.
States he'll be lynched by deadline * major faux pas. Innocent?
In response to MgM:
Thesp wrote:I think the people who didn't lynch me are pretty telling.
Thesp, can you please elaborate upon this statement?
Zeroes in on my godfather comments and pooh poohs them. (I'd also pegged him as a likely godfather the previous day).
Notes one comment of mine pressing CDB:
Thesp wrote:I echo MrBuddyLee's request for ChannelDelibird's input on various people.
But is also pretty much the only person not to express curiosity about my reasons for sudden shift on CDB.
I have used the “persistent push on one scumpartner” before to great effect. I think Thesp's overall behavior has been scummy, but his behavior specifically towards CDB seems like a genuine push on an unknown, not an attack on a scumpartner. I'd lean significantly town on Thesp at this point based on the nature of his attack on CDB, plus the likely investigation. CES's insta-vote on Thesp seems bizarre to me, and that's where my next reread is going.
CES, how does lynching a likely investigated innocent work out as the mathematical best choice today? Please enlighten us.
FOS: CES