Dude, if you reread, you will actually find that Norinel floated the idea of him picking between us, and if suspected you more, he and I would order you to unvote, wait for me to vote, and
then
hammer under threat of a straight lynch.
So, yes. You
did
have to worry about losing the game because of Norinel's role.
geraintm wrote:adele, all your comments in post 986 are very, very hypocritical.
No, they aren't.
geraintm wrote:you say that i have changed my thinking, but my reason to vote for you are exactly what you are claiming for me!
Hmm. You're voting for me because you refuse to consider letting Norinel choose between us. I'm voting for you because you refuse to consider letting Norinel choose between us. You're right, that's
exactly
the same reason - in both cases, your myopia. The upshot of which is, Norinel has to choose between us (am I the only one who finds that ironic?)
geraintm wrote: you can't say it is unrasnable for me to assume you are the serial killer because you wouldn't vote for norinel, then say i am the serial killer because i wouldn't vote for norinel.
I know I'm not the SK; therefore (from my perspective) there's a higher chance that you're the SK than there is that I am. Therefore I'd prefer you to potentially get hit by hammering Norinel if he's telling the truth than that I get hit.
geraintm wrote:misses the point that i had vote for norinel! and i was waiting for you to finish him off!
EXACTLY
. I would've considered hammering him if you'd done the same, but you refused to. From my perspective THERE IS A CHANCE you are the SK and Norinel's telling the truth, and by hammering Norinel, I'D BE KILLING HIM AND MYSELF AND LOSING THE GAME FOR TOWN!!!
There's no chance in HELL you still don't understand this. The reason I wouldn't blindly hammer Norinel is the same reason you're
claiming
as why you would never even consider it. There's one difference between my approach to today and yours - I've been willing to be reasonable, to potentially put myself at risk. You've insisted that the play results in you certainly surivivng the day - exactly the play I'd expect from an SK.
You've been scummy as heck. I've not been hypocritical at all, actually; it
was
you who rejected Norinel's plan and forced us into this face-off. I worked my tail off for days (we've only lynched one mafioso in this game - MBL - and I'd like to take responsibility for that particular victory, pushing him and enumerating his lies), while you've sat back as the "doc" and trusted we'd know better than to hurt
you
.
Well, here it is. Hammering Norinel would've given me a 2-in-3 chance (as I then perceived it) of lynching the SK and winning the game. It wasn't as good as it could be if you were hammering (since I'm town, that'd give a definate town win). So, here's my question:
Was it scummy of me to prefer the scenario where you, rather than I, hammer Norinel?
The fact that you manipulated the situation so that you were never in direct risk of having to do that? Irrelevant. (though I'd like to also point out that when SL asked me to unvote Norinel on that basis,
I
happily did so).
This is getting tiresome. ger and I will shout each other round in a circle. Perhaps it would be better if Norinel asked us what he considers to be the important questions.