Dry-fit wrote: In post 517, Kenobi wrote:@Dry, I find it interesting that you think I'm 'buddying' you; could you give some examples?
Well one of the things isn't buddying in the traditional sense I guess. In
164 when you said you said you weren't offended by me intimating you're not a particularly strong player, it struck me as somewhat suspicious. I think scum would be less likely to take offense, and might mind being insulted as long as the player insulting you doesn't find you scummy. Other than that you've called me town several times without giving any reasoning, even though all of your other reads are more involved. This despite saying you mentally lump me in with Maxous who is null to you.
You do have to remember that I was (and still am) a fairly new player; my not being offended at you suggesting I wasn't a strong player was because a) I would be incredibly surprised if I came across as a strong player, especially with the quality of my posts at that time, and b) because I don't think I am, either. Why would I get offended by that? It was an observation, you specifically said "no offense" and I was interacting with that.
In post 145, Dry-fit wrote:Whiskers wrote:I'm wary of Kenobi. Mainly, because he looks good.
I don't mean any offense here Kenobi, but really?
As for why I
thought
you were town (and I did, until I started really going over your posts):
In post 49, Dry-fit wrote:
Right now I'm kind of wondering why people aren't sheeping me onto Pasch.
Maxous vs Psyche is based on a misunderstanding.
Bulba vs Emp is based on non-issues as best as I can tell.
Zekrom needs to get more assertive with his play.
In post 49, Dry-fit wrote:
Right now I'm kind of wondering why people aren't sheeping me onto Pasch.
Maxous vs Psyche is based on a misunderstanding.
Bulba vs Emp is based on non-issues as best as I can tell.
Zekrom needs to get more assertive with his play.
In post 145, Dry-fit wrote:Whiskers wrote:I'm wary of Kenobi. Mainly, because he looks good.
I don't mean any offense here Kenobi, but really?
TierShift wrote:Lynching them will give us hardly anything to work off day 2, even if they were to flip scum. What's more, they'll probably give away their alignment at some point in time anyway.
I've got news for you, Zekrom already has. He's scum. I'm also not sure just how much of a newbie he is. His whole response to Pasch's play has been off. Especially post
140, a post that's seems to be looking to curry favor with a player who was his top suspect previously and who he still seems to suspect.
@Zekrom: Why did you unvote Pasch?
I'm also not liking cxinlee's Kenobi vote:
cxinlee wrote:VOTE: Kenobi
If you’re town, step it up. If you’re scum, I request nothing of you.
Putting the onus on Kenobi to prove he's town when he's a new player under pressure is just setting him up to fail.
Actually I think cxinlee is a little more likely to be scum.
unvote.
Vote: cxinlee.
Towny start is towny.
Your town play was really good, but one thing that stuck with me over your ISO was your belligerent pursuit of Tier. You said recently in
513 that "I'm not explaining again why I think you're scum just read my posts."
And earlier in
508, it was "I still like Tier for scum for reasons I've already given."
The only stuff you have on Tier that I can see is these posts:
In post 152, Dry-fit wrote:I'm not over the moon about Tiershift's whole defending the newbies thing, but I do think it's unlikely he'd be doing it if he was buddies with them.
In post 253, Dry-fit wrote: In post 249, TierShift wrote:Guys...if you want to lynch zekrom, don't write it off to anything else than a policy lynch.
This guy is town.
Do you mind going into this some? Because what I'm seeing from Zekrom is a player whose view of the game isn't changing with new information. He's still trying to discredit Pasch and I suppose still finds Kenobi scummy, though he isn't really pursuing it. I'm not convinced he's trying to figure things out in this game.
In post 269, Dry-fit wrote:TierShift is a mildly scummy read for me. A lot of stuff he's done feels off. The defending the newbies, then flipflopping and saying they're scummy but not really doing anything about that suspicion. Also kept his vote on Whiskers for voting the now scummy newbies. Blowing Empking stuff out of proportion all of a sudden and calling Empking "under the radar." Bad reason for going back to finding Zekrom town. His one saving grace was his cx vote, but he's been hopping around a bit so it's not surprising he'd be on a good wagon at some point.
In post 284, Dry-fit wrote:TierShift wrote:Dry-fit's read on me is fair, I've been hopping quite a lot.
What's fair about it? Do you think vote hopping is a scumtell in general?
In post 309, Dry-fit wrote:
Gotta love that passive aggressive sarcasm Tier.
Unvote. Vote: Tiershift.
You've taken yourself over the edge here my man.
That's basically it for your Tier case. There's nothing in there that comes across as scummy.
inb4 I'm "defending" Tier.
Tier-hunting aside, you've contradicted yourself here:
In post 370, Dry-fit wrote:Tier why do you find Emp a more plausible lynch than cx when Emp had no votes on him when you voted?
Zekrom could you tell us what mafia experience you have? 362 made my brain hurt.
TierShift wrote:Uh this guy will pick wrongly in LyLo and he'll consistently be someone that will be hated on. I don't want him around, even though I'm not sure he's scum.
Read 362 and tell me you want him around.
How do you know he'll pick wrong in lylo? If he's truly clueless it seems like it would be a coinflip. Also not interested in a policy lynch.
In post 387, Dry-fit wrote:Pasch is probably right about what he's saying in
378.
Unvote
Vote: Zekrom25.
Let's do this.
*blinks* that's quite a turnaround in 17 posts. And all it took was Pasch saying that Zekrom was up-playing his noobishness. "not interested in a policy lynch" my foot.
Vote: Dry-Fit
