Open 18 - Game Over - before 424

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Unvote, Vote: TCS

Not liking how you put Panzer one from lynch when there isn't even a reason behind the bandwagon.

Asking for reasons is a scumtell.

FOS: bird1111

[Ripley]

Leaving my vote where it is, on John. He's made 17 posts (of a total of 53 total posts made by 9 players + 1 mod) almost all of which have been junk. I've seen in other games how a player like this can damage a game by clogging it up with rubbish posts. It becomes all but impossible to reread; it's so hard to find the relevant material amongst the junk that people tend not bother trying, which only helps scum. And players like this are never nightkilled, and become more of a liability as the number of people alive dwindles.

Maybe, just maybe, this was an early flurry of posts that will turn out not to be typical. If it starts to look like that was the case I'll reconsider.

[John]

Thats a junk reason. Almost as shitty as TCS's vote on Panzer.
Vote for me cause I post alot? Who cares? It's page 2, of course its all junk, what else do we have to go on? Noone has posted, including you. Why don't you become an active member of this thread and not sit around accusing me of "posting too much".

Unvote, Vote: Ripley

[PJ.]

Unvote, Vote:TCS

for being the most incredibly scummy player I've ever seen and i agree that john's posting is ridiculous and the OMGUS vote was also stupid.

[John]

You.... Agree?
I'm... I'm... Touched.

AHHH STOP TOUCHING ME!

[John]

Pilsberry dough boy poke: PanzerJager

[IH]

FoS:John

Confirmvote:PanzerJagger

= )

[John]

Me and Panzer know each other in real life, hence the friendly comments. We're not scum buddies. Should have cleared that up sooner.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Unvote, Vote:TCS

for being the most incredibly scummy player I've ever seen and i agree that john's posting is ridiculous and the OMGUS vote was also stupid.

Uh-huh. Ridiculously scummy. Talk louder please, I don't think you're believable enough.

[John]

Panzer, what TCS is trying to say is "please explain why I am scummy".

[PJ.]

I would also like an Explanation from IH.

[John]

Well, since your here, do your explaining, and clear your name before your lynched. Or don't, I don't care either way.

IH, is an explanation too much to ask for?

[PJ.]

I don't need explaining, I haven't done anything that needs to be explained.

[John]

Explain why TCS is scum.

[PJ.]

He follows you for 4 post then makes a rubbish post then says is up for a panzer lynch. This makes no sense because it was page 2 and no arguement. How are you gonna just lynch someone with zero reason. I believe both him and IH are lynching me due to other games and it's very scummy. They are just lynching blindly in a situation where we could essentially die 3 days if we continue to mis lynch. He then Finger of Suspicions Bird for asking why. He also refose to give reason and ignores my post. I see TCS as the best lynch.

[Simenon]

I here, but I'd rather wait 'till monday to post something significant. This tiger theme is blinding.

[IH]

Leaving my vote where it is, on John.

He's made 17 posts (of a total of 53 total posts made by 9 players + 1 mod) almost all of which have been junk.

I've seen in other games how a player like this can damage a game by clogging it up with rubbish posts. It becomes all but impossible to reread; it's so hard to find the relevant material amongst the junk that people tend not bother trying, which only helps scum. And players like this are never nightkilled, and become more of a liability as the number of people alive dwindles.

Maybe, just maybe, this was an early flurry of posts that will turn out not to be typical. If it starts to look like that was the case I'll reconsider.

(Agree)

Thats a junk reason. Almost as shitty as TCS's vote on Panzer.
Vote for me cause I post alot? Who cares? It's page 2, of course its all junk, what else do we have to go on? Noone has posted, including you. Why don't you become an active member of this thread and not sit around accusing me of "posting too much".

Unvote, Vote: Ripley

Replying with an Omgus attack/vote.

Hence the FoS

Unvote, Vote:TCS for being the most incredibly scummy player I've ever seen and i agree that john's posting is ridiculous and the OMGUS vote was also stupid.

He acknowledges it also, but doesn't call it suspicious, just ridiculous and stupid. Not only that, he calls the minus 1 vote the most incredibly scummy player you've ever seen.

Seriously? That's the scummiest player you've seen? You must not have seen to many....

Me and Panzer know each other in real life, hence the friendly comments. We're not scum buddies. Should have cleared that up sooner.

Reacting to something I wasn't even talking about. This means you're on edge, and find the need to defend something.

If you would notice 62, 63 John repeats Panzer.

I don't need explaining, I haven't done anything that needs to be explained.

This is just as scummy, if his vote was substantiated, he'd explain it.

Also, my vote on Panzer was a random vote, the first one, SV was second,

Post 34 sent up red flags about John responding to random votes on panzer. Then John throws down an OMGUS vote after Panzer voted him in post 40 (which I'm guessing is a 'hey stop commenting on it')

Major FoS: TCS I'm at -1 and have been put there for literally no reason. I demand votes be taken off me before I am hammered.

I would have agreed, if you wouldn't have posted the last statement with it. Seriously, you think you were going to get hammered? You demand they be taken off of you? If you would have gotten hammered then Hammerer and TCS would have clearly been scum.

Also, John didn't even note on it, but moved his vote to Ripley quickly, then demanding explanations.

I think that it's either TCS, Panzer, and John.

TCS, because last time he tried to lynch someone for no reason, he was scum, trying to lynch his buddy.

Panzer for the reaction and statement in the last post I quoted.

John for being all spammy and following people.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

I was applying pressure to Panzerjager.

His reaction by no means makes me want to remove my vote from him.

[LyingBrian]

Vote Count:

• [3] Panzerjager
  • IH
    
  • spectrumvoid
    
  • The Central Scrutinizer
• [2] Ripley
  • John
    
  • Simenon
• [2] The Central Scrutinizer
  • bird1111
    
  • Panzerjager
• [1] bird1111
  • _Converge
• [1] John
  • Ripley
• [0] NOT VOTING

Lynch:

5 votes

[John]

IH, you make a very good point about me, I did not mean to make spammy posts, I apoligize.

I mentioned me and panzer knew each other because the way the posts were going, it seemed as though me and panzer were scum buddies. This explains th random votes for each other, and the charades joke.

Maybe I overreacted to being told I was spam posting, but when someone comes in who hasn't really posted at all, and tells me to stop, it angers me, and I hope you see why.

Unvote

BTW, Ripley still hasn't posted again. I can't make an accurate analysis if people are lurking/not posting. I can't judge them, and it really holds up the game, even more than my spam posts.

[PJ.]

I'm sorry but when someone gets lynched for no reason it has a lot to do with out of game or other game reasons and bring emotions from other games is not scummy but it is not conducive to scum-catching, because it clouds your judgement.

[spectrumvoid]

unvote

Mod: I apologise, but I am unable to post on weekends. Let me know if this is a problem.

John: I'd appreciate if you stop bringing up outside stuff. It only makes you appear spammy, and either way it makes you look scummy. Currently, I read you more as a townie with bad play though.

I like IH's case on panzer mainly because of the 'I don't need to explain myself' bit.

I'm not too sure whether TCS stands in my LOS at the moment, since he's pretty much inscrutable most of the time.

[Simenon]

Leaving my vote where it is, on John. He's made 17 posts (of a total of 53 total posts made by 9 players + 1 mod) almost all of which have been junk. I've seen in other games how a player like this can damage a game by clogging it up with rubbish posts. It becomes all but impossible to reread; it's so hard to find the relevant material amongst the junk that people tend not bother trying, which only helps scum. And players like this are never nightkilled, and become more of a liability as the number of people alive dwindles.

Maybe, just maybe, this was an early flurry of posts that will turn out not to be typical. If it starts to look like that was the case I'll reconsider.

Possibly the scummiest thing in the thread.

Attacking people for posting differently is a scumtell. Are you encouraging a lynch because you think john "posts rubbish"? Sure he does, but so do many with his similar experience. If you don't find anything scummy within his posts, just ignore them!

Secondly, John is helping the town by being active, not hurting it. I don't think john is overly active, but the town is overly inactive.

This sounds like a baseless and somewhat opportunistic attack on a newbie. Keeping my vote.

IH and TCS are probably town, and I have a small feeling spectrum is too.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

I'm not too sure whether TCS stands in my LOS at the moment, since he's pretty much inscrutable most of the time.

I still haven't figured out if this is a good or bad thing.

[PJ.]

Unvote, Vote:TCS

for being the most incredibly scummy player I've ever seen and i agree that john's posting is ridiculous and the OMGUS vote was also stupid.

Major FoS: TCS

I'm at -1 and have been put there for literally no reason. I demand votes be taken off me before I am hammered.

Those look like explanations to me, so why should I further explain my actions since those are the only significant post I've made prior to saying

I don't need explaining, I haven't done anything that needs to be explained.

I haven't done anything scummy that needs explaining, so I don't need to explain why I'm not scummy. Thats what that meant. If you need more explanation then that ask a question about a specific thing, do not be vague and say you have explaining to do when we are on page 2.